Here's more... Greg Palast, a superb investigative reporter, does it again.
In
this extract from his forthcoming book he describes how Jay Garner, originally
placed in charge of Iraq, was sacked and replaced by Paul Bremer,
because he actually wanted to bring democracy to the Iraqis. This, however,
would have impeded Bushco's plans to asset-strip Iraq because a freely-elected Iraqi government would never allow this.
Garner promised elections within 90 days.
A full assessment and detailed plans to asset-strip the oil industry in particular was estimated at 270 days.
So Garner was replaced by Paul Bremer (III), Kissinger Associates henchman, who would preside over the corporate looting of the country.
"My preference," Garner told me in his understated manner, "was to put the Iraqis in charge as soon as we can and do it in some form of
elections."
But elections were not in The Plan.
The Plan was a 101-page document to guide the long-term future of the land we'd just conquered. There was nothing in it about democracy or elections
or safety. There was, rather, a detailed schedule for selling off "all [Iraq's] state assets" -- and Iraq, that's just about everything --
"especially," said The Plan, "the oil and supporting industries." Especially the oil.
There was more than oil to sell off. The Plan included the sale of Iraq's banks, and weirdly, changing it's copyright laws and other odd items that
made the plan look less like a program for Iraq to get on its feet than a program for corporate looting of the nation's assets. (And indeed, we
discovered at BBC, behind many of the odder elements -- copyright and tax code changes -- was the hand of lobbyist Jack Abramoff's associate Grover
Norquist.)
But Garner didn't think much of The Plan, he told me when we met a year later in Washington. He had other things on his mind. "You prevent
epidemics, you start the food distribution program to prevent famine."
Seizing title and ownership of Iraq's oil fields was not on Garner's must-do list. He let that be known to Washington. "I don't think [Iraqis]
need to go by the U.S. plan, I think that what we need to do is set an Iraqi government that represents the freely elected will of the people." He
added, "It's their country … their oil."
Apparently, the Secretary of Defense disagreed. So did lobbyist Norquist. And Garner incurred their fury by getting carried away with the
"democracy" idea: he called for quick elections -- within 90 days of the taking of Baghdad.
But Garner's 90-days-to-elections commitment ran straight into the oil sell-off program. Annex D of the plan indicated that would take at least 270
days -- at least 9 months.
Worse, Garner was brokering a truce between Sunnis, Shias and Kurds. They were about to begin what Garner called a "Big Tent" meeting to hammer out
the details and set the election date. He figured he had 90 days to get it done before the factions started slitting each other's throats.