Originally posted by emile
Now who consider that PIRANHA was developed from VIGGEN? Who don't think so?I think both side no evidence but the Piranha is really similar to
Viggen.
Well I've said I don't and you have said you disagree so we can develop this conversation a little further
Here is a quick comparison.
Pirhana appears (going by the scale of the canopy to the rest of it) to be a light fighter powered by an engine in the RB.199/F-404 class. The Viggen
is powered by an afterburning version of the P&W JT-8D, if it was re-engined with the former engines it would require two of them. Pirhana has only
one.
Pirhana has a swept mid mounted wing, Viggen has a low delta. Pirhana is directly comparable with the BAe P.106, HAL Tejas and SAAB Gripen, Viggen is
the same size as a Panavia Tornado. The idea that a large fighter can be re-designed into a much smaller one is ludicrous, even the F-16A was bigger
and heavier than the YF-16, the F-22A is bigger and heavier than the YF-22, this is what development does, planes get bigger, not smaller. The only
exception is when a small scale throwaway test prototype is made for a forthcoming design, this does not apply to the Pirhana which was intended for
service in its own right.
If you want to develop a light fighter you start small from scratch.
Please tell me why you think the Pirhana was developed from the Viggen?