It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bombs in the WTC? Why not the terrorists?

page: 5
0
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 29 2006 @ 09:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by AgentSmith
If, hypothetically speaking, there were bombs involved in the collapse of the WTC, why would it have to be the Government, why not the terrorists?


People squwack at the notion of how could our gov't, who could get access, could plant bombs in the towers without being seen. I find it not even remotely possible that the terrorists could get any kind of access without been seen by security.




posted on May, 31 2006 @ 02:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by diggs
People squawk at the notion of how could our gov't, who could get access, could plant bombs in the towers without being seen. I find it not even remotely possible that the terrorists could get any kind of access without been seen by security.


of course. simple common sense disrupted by complex lexicons of memes implanted by a hostile 'media'(the blogosphere, in this case).
'they' will give a word a new meaning, if that's what it takes.

it is an INSANE notion that somehow a multi TRILLION dollar entity(ie. the uberrich elite who own 90% of everything, including the 'chattel' that is the citizenry of the world) could NOT 'pull it off', yet a handful of BUMBLING FOOLS could.

[edit on 31-5-2006 by billybob]



new topics
 
0
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join