"Doctor, Why do you assume that the alien was "Caught"? He wasn't "caught". See, it's assumptions like that, when you start adding to the
story, that make it harder to believe. You're making something up to satisfy your belief that it's not real.
You need to watch the WHOLE alien interview. Get as many facts as you can. Here's a link.....Watch the WHOLE story.
This video is 1 hour and 6 minutes long. VERY good watching.
And by the way Doctor, who "Proved" that the autopsy video was fake? If it were REAL footage that got out, the government would put something
together to make it APPEAR that it was a hoax to cover their asses. Make a couple of foam puppets and tell the world that some pranksters spent TONS
of money for no aparent reason to pull off this little video. Yeah. That's believable. So.....the autopsy wasn't PROVEN to be anything. If YOU want
to believe it's real, then do so. If YOU want to believe it's a hoax, then do so. But with a subject matter such as this, (UFOs and aliens)
something that the government is so hard at work to keep hidden from the public despite all the TONS of evidence, you HAVE to come to your own
decisions. Don't believe something is FAKE just because someone else says so. That's not research at all."
The guys who made the alien autopsy admitted it was a hoax. Whether you beleive it or not the "fact" is it was fake. They even showed the set that
they made themselves. www.bbc.co.uk...
Rick Baker in the video you provide said he could do better with special effects and noticed certain things like the movements, the creepy lighting
and the fact that whoever made the tape made the effort to hide the anatomy. He staked his reputation on it and he has won academy awards for special
effects. Your problem is you accept everything at face value without further analysis and that shoots the credability of ET beleivers in the foot.
Just saying it was real does not make it real.
Victor (tape source) also seemed more interested in profit considering he would not release the tape to the news media or other media for free. So how
much was he paid for the tape. He had mentioned monetary freedom etc. So that begs the question why would you want money for such an important
revelation. "Victor" clearly hoaxed the tape and made a lot of money from it. So did the guys who marketed this video.
You also said get as many facts as you can the only people who say this video are real are the ufologists who insist it is authentic and Victor. There
is no audio in video nor is there appropriate lighting. It was also mentioned in the video that their eyes are black to protect them from bright light
yet they needed a darkened room for the interview.
"That would be very hard considering I'm in canada. Anyways, maybe the video is a fake, maybe it is real, we shouldn't argue about its
authenticity. Yea, anyways..." ~Jimmy
We should argue it's authenticity since it is clearly a fake. No ands, if's or butts about it. Remember I'm not the one claiming truth with no
evidence I am skeptical and rightfully so. When things like this pop up you have to analylize it and get expert testemony. Special effects people like
Rick Baker saying it was a puppet is a start and since only 2 people said concretely it was real but only provided sketchy details one being Victor
who admitted to selling the tape for profit but then said it wasn't for the money. The other being Richard Dean a ufologist who claimed it was real
but never actually provided details why it was real other then he was in Intellegence.
There are indescrepencies and again don't accept things as fact with no hard concrete evidence. He could have just edited the audio on the tape and
released but he didn't. Also the guy who analyzed the tape said it was shot on film most likely not video as victor had claimed. He also said however
it is possible but you would have to be in "specific conditions" to do so.
The film might not have that B&W aspect to it but it was clearly made to intentionally be creepy.
I have seen better in movies and TV spfx and I know they can and have done better the "WHOLE" interview is just a few minutes long of poorly lit
soundless video footage which is apparently just a copy of the original tape.