TAW - 50 leaked info...?

page: 1
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 21 2006 @ 01:25 PM
link   
What do you folks think of this...? True leaked info, or BS?

-------------------------------------------------

www.drboylan.com...

Defense Contractor Leaks Details of a U.S. antigravitic space fighter-bomber,
the Advanced TAW-50

By Richard Boylan, Ph.D.

4.18.2005 rev.

-------------------------------------------------

A defense contractor with whom I have been in communication leaked to me details of a U.S. antigravitic space fighter-bomber, the Advanced TAW-50.

Developed during the early 1990s, the capabilities of this war-bird are
jaw-dropping. And the technology shows that the Defense
Department did not fail to utilize what it learned combing
through the wreckage of various UFO crashes.

The TAW-50 has speed capabilities well in excess of Mach 50,
a number the contractor calls "a very conservative
estimate." Its actual speed "is classified." Mach 1 is 1,225
kilometers per hour, (approximately 748 mph). That means
that the TAW-50 is capable of moving way faster than 38,000
mph. In comparison, the velocity required to escape Earth's
gravity is 25,000 mph. And yes, the TAW-50 does go into
space.

The TAW-50 has a SCRAM (supersonic ramjet) propulsion system
for passing through the outer atmosphere.

The TAW-50 has a crew of four. Nevertheless, the TAW-50
flies so fast that it requires computers to fly it. These
were developed by American Computer Company, who derived
them from its Valkyrie XB/9000 AI [artificial intelligence]
Guidance series. They utilize a RISC Milspec Superchip.
"There are 180 of them in the flight control system, and 64
more in the weapons guidance system," the contractor
reported.

It can carry a combined payload of glide bombs and a package
of MIRV (Multiple Independently-targeted Reentry Vehicles),
mil-speak for a group of intercontinental ballistic
missiles, each of which can seek out and strike a different
target. The MIRV pack also contains reentry-capable balloon
countermeasures to make it very difficult for laser and
other defense weapons to track down where the real MIRVs are
and intercept them.

The TAW-50 is armed with its own Kill Laser system, which
can track and immolate SAM (Surface-to-Air missiles), STTA
(Surface-To-Trans-Atmosphere missiles), ATA (Air-To-Air
missiles), and ATTA (Air-To-Trans-Air missiles). The
TAW-50's killer lasers can also knock down high-performance
fighter interceptors. The TAW's Kill Laser is much smaller
than the earlier 1980s-era SDI (Star Wars program) models,
and has a miniaturized cooling core and 500 times the
wattage. The contractor said it "uses a spontaneous
nucleonic burst to trigger the lasing [laser] effect."

In addition, the TAW-50 is armed with micro-super-explosive
HyperDart missiles. These are just a little larger than
ordinary aircraft cannon ammunition, but travel at
hypersonic speed for up to three minutes, and have enormous
explosive capability. One HyperDart can blow apart a MiG
fighter anywhere within 20 feet of the HyperDart. The TAW-50
carries several hundred HyperDarts.

Because the TAW-50 is designed to operate in space, it has
on board a two-day air supply. This air supply can be
extended by using its scoop system and traveling into the
upper atmosphere.

The TAW-50's power supply is provided by a small nuclear
power generator that the contractor said is "Normal-Inert".
The contractor said that the spaceplane uses
electromagnetoferrometric power generation by the immersion
of pellets in heavy water (deuterium) and specially-designed
coil superconductive magnets, which yield enormous amounts
of free electrons when placed in an immersion which has been
triggered into an oscillating field state flux.

The TAW-50 utilizes electrogravitics to maintain its own
artificial gravity while in weightless space, as well as to
nullify the vehicle's mass during operations.

The contractor did not reveal the size of the space
fighter-bomber except to say, "It's a pretty big thing."

The performance of the TAW-50 makes it virtually
impossible to defend against. It can hide in orbit many
hundreds of miles into space, orbiting at times at 22,000 mph.
Then, without warning, it can dive straight down through the
atmosphere at over 38,000 miles per hour on an 80-degree
attack vector, reverse direction within 150 feet of the ground
with very little loss of motion and without a glide
turn, and
almost instantly go vertically straight up at over 38,000 mph
until long after it leaves the atmosphere and resumes orbiting
in space.

The contractor noted, "Those [electro-] gravitics allow it to
change its mass to almost nothing in a moment, and reverse
direction in a second, increase its acceleration to so many
times G [Earth's gravity] it's not funny, yet they are able
to nearly nullify the G-force on the pilots. They [the
electrogravitics] are fourth generation, with the ability to
bring it to a complete standstill in under 2 milliseconds,
if need be, without crushing the pilots, and keep it there
for quite some time."

The contractor notes, "It's far too fast for tracking radars.
" And, he adds, what military aims its radars straight up?

The TAW-50 can be refueled and rearmed in orbit by docking
with the secret undeclared Military Space Station that is in
orbit. (See: www.drboylan.com... ) The
entire refueling and rearming procedure takes under 10
minutes. Who mans the gas pumps? Military astronauts trained
at the Secret Air Force Academy, located in the hills west
of the official Air Force Academy at Colorado Springs, CO.
These military astronauts rotate duty by traveling to and
from Vandenburg Air Force Base on other military antigravity
vehicles. (See: www.drboylan.com... ) The
Space Shuttles have carried the arming platforms
("classified Defense Dept. payloads") up to the secret
Military Space Station. The contractor reported that with a
few extra tanks of LOX (liquid oxygen), the TAW-50 could fly
to the Moon and back.





posted on May, 21 2006 @ 01:46 PM
link   
As of 2002, the U.S. has 20 TAW-50s in its arsenal. But, as
the contractor commented, "you could take out an entire
nation in under 10 days with only 10 of these, doing three
attacks a day. One can wipe out an entire city the size of
suburban Cleveland in a single attack without having to use
any nukes at all."

The TAW-50 was jointly developed by the Lockheed-Martin
Skunk Works (Palmdale-Helendale, CA) and Northrop
(undoubtedly at their undeclared "Anthill" facility within
the Tehachapi Mountains, northwest of Lancaster, CA.) Both
companies have a history of development of secret
anti-gravity craft at these Mojave Desert facilities.

The electrogravitics for the TAW-50 was produced by GE
Radionics. Pratt & Whitney designed the SCRAM atmospheric
penetrator technology. American Computing Company created
the artificial intelligence supercomputers.

**********************************************



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 01:47 PM
link   
It sees too detailed to be a fake, my opinion, its leaked.



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 02:32 PM
link   
Everyone has been on the edge of thier seats for years waiting for something of this size to be released in to the domain, and it sounds amazing but slightly beyond belief.

It would be incredible that a lot of these theories mounting up for the past 50 or so years such as the reverse engineering of space craft and secret underground bases could actualy be combined in a project like this and there is plenty of information to warant a little effort to try and find anything more on this.

I am not going to get my hopes up though as we are going to need a lot of hard evidence to make it 100% believable.

Great bit of imagination if it isnt real, it has got my brain tingling. lol



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 02:41 PM
link   



Aye, they have been developed and are in service...


Thats why the USAF just wasted 60 odd billion dollars on the F-22




There are conspiracy theories and there are fantasies, this is obviously the latter.



Please no-one be stupid enough to post up that the F-22 is a bluff to keep it all a "secret"



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 02:52 PM
link   
HOAX

if it is as good as it claims then it must be extremely expensive. im thinking in the 100's of billions at the very least so 20 and even the us cant afford that. however if we assume that the us can afford them for a moment then if they have been in service since 2002 then why havent we seen them in action. why havent there been any reports of it in iraq?

However this leak is so crazy that maybe it is true. surely nobody in their right minds would make up a hoax as unbelievable as this.

justin



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 03:02 PM
link   
www.abovetopsecret.com...

parrallel thread

justin



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 03:33 PM
link   

Originally posted by kilcoo316



Aye, they have been developed and are in service...


Thats why the USAF just wasted 60 odd billion dollars on the F-22




There are conspiracy theories and there are fantasies, this is obviously the latter.



Please no-one be stupid enough to post up that the F-22 is a bluff to keep it all a "secret"


You don't think it's possible that they make aircraft such as the F-22 at the same time they develop and make much more advanced aircraft?



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 03:52 PM
link   
I'm inclined to belive that Dr. Boylan has at least some of the "inventory" correct in description if not in nomenclature. I have a real proof "OCD-like" obession that visiting ATS has seemed to stimulate. No matter for now.

The fleet as described does seem to satisfy at least some descriptions of unknown aerial phenomina. It makes sense to me that such valuable assets (regardless of cost) would not be used much, if at all, in "public" wars. I may be proven incorrect.

If, and it's a big "if", "all the stories were true" from about the '30's on then such a fleet and development curve seems not only reasonable but essential if there were any (even the most remote) potential of "threat" from without. Whether such a threat exists or not is perhaps immaterial... the perception of potential threat is a great motivator.

Now let's say an element of humanity has such "tech" and what if such tech would "wipeout" economic infrastructure, is it then such a stretch of imagination as to the resources that'd be devoted to non-disclosure of such tech?

This would explain a whole heck of a lot. I just need a little proof - like one falling off a truck on a highway, or making an emerg safe landing in say Central Park... just a little proof and I'm on-board 100%.

Thanx,

Victor K.

[edit on 21-5-2006 by V Kaminski]



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by The_Time_is_now
It sees too detailed to be a fake, my opinion, its leaked.




IMO thats a joke, you ever read how much detail they go into in Star Wars, or Star Trek source books? Pages and pages of incredibly detailed jibberish, bit like this. Course, if I get beamed up anytime soon, I'll come back and apologise for laughing.



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 04:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by Implosion

Originally posted by The_Time_is_now
It sees too detailed to be a fake, my opinion, its leaked.




IMO thats a joke, you ever read how much detail they go into in Star Wars, or Star Trek source books? Pages and pages of incredibly detailed jibberish, bit like this. Course, if I get beamed up anytime soon, I'll come back and apologise for laughing.


Yeah thats true, but maybe there is some truth. Did you read the part where he talked about the B-2 bomber? I always wondered why they cost 3 billion apiece, now I think I know why. Maybe these aircraft do exist. Years ago, when the SR-71 Blackbird was in service, people used to speculate about it, and they were told it did'nt exist, but then they proved it was real, when it was declassified by the CIA years later. So I think that the same thing might happen soon.



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 05:28 PM
link   
To claim that it can travel at mach 50 is ridiculous. I dont think we have a material on earth that could withstand the air resistance temperatures generated by travelling that fast!



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 05:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by meshuggah1324
You don't think it's possible that they make aircraft such as the F-22 at the same time they develop and make much more advanced aircraft?



There is a difference between development and researching.
Research comes a long way before development.


It took the USA 30 odd years to get from theories of reducing radar signature to the F-22 in service.

How long have theories of SCRAMjets been doing the rounds?
How long have theories and experiments on shape memory alloys been around?



Of course, there is the much disputed Podkletnov experiment (which supposedly induces a reduction in weight of around 2%), but I'd prefer a proper peer reviewed source than pseudo-science.

www.esa.int...


It demonstrates that a superconductive gyroscope is capable of generating a powerful gravitomagnetic field, and is therefore the gravitational counterpart of the magnetic coil. Although just 100 millionths of the acceleration due to the Earth’s gravitational field, the measured field is a surprising one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein’s General Relativity predicts.



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 06:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by gfad
To claim that it can travel at mach 50 is ridiculous. I dont think we have a material on earth that could withstand the air resistance temperatures generated by travelling that fast!


Indeed we don't. Even this "Ununpentium" can't possibly do this.

They're claiming the material protects the pilot and what not, if this would be true, it'd be impossible to crash, in which case, we would never have car crashes, we would never have plane crashes, this is pure science fiction guys...cumon.


d1k

posted on May, 21 2006 @ 06:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by gfad
To claim that it can travel at mach 50 is ridiculous. I dont think we have a material on earth that could withstand the air resistance temperatures generated by travelling that fast!


It's supposed to be an anti gravity vehicle. It could be made of paper inside it's own gravity travelling at mach 50.



posted on May, 21 2006 @ 06:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by d1k
It's supposed to be an anti gravity vehicle. It could be made of paper inside it's own gravity travelling at mach 50.


You think we're capable of using Anti-Gravity? We don't even know what the hell gravity is or how it works yet!

Why haven't we used it? How can these people POSSIBLY know any of the specs if it's never been tested, it'd be severely difficult to keep this thing secret for long.

This person uses the word Secret too many times too "Secret Air Force Academy" for the "Secret Military Space Station" sounds like someones trying to tell me about Star Wars.



posted on May, 22 2006 @ 04:24 AM
link   
Just how many gullible muppets are there? I'm astonished that anyone gives this a nth of credibility. Complete cobblers from start to finish. I think some people need to lay off the sci fi and take a look at the real world for a while.


I suppose itsd deignation stands for 'Totally Awesome Wish'?



posted on May, 22 2006 @ 05:15 AM
link   
I have a gut feeling this might actually be true.

Some of the information in this article COMPLETELY corroberates with so much things I have encountered and researched.

I say this is real with little doubt in my mind.



posted on May, 22 2006 @ 05:26 AM
link   
You've also got to ask why would they keep this secret?? Normally the only active aircraft classified are recon for obvious reasons. Surely if the USAF had made breakthroughs that defied all scientific knowledge they would release them to the world and show off this amazing craft. There is absolutely no advantage to be gained by creating such a super-fighter and then keeping it secret.

I to am amazed that so many people believe crap like this. It seems like the author has read all the conspiracy theories from the past 20 years and made this craft up to fit into them all!! The secret space station (which clearly doesnt exist), a super fast aircraft (which is impossible with our current knowledge of materials), anti-gravity (which goes against all our known physics), a space-fighter, micro darts, nuclear powered etc etc!



posted on May, 22 2006 @ 05:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by GrOuNd_ZeRo
I have a gut feeling this might actually be true.

Some of the information in this article COMPLETELY corroberates with so much things I have encountered and researched.

I say this is real with little doubt in my mind.





Please produce some proper [peer reviewed] evidence (of gravity wave manipulation techniques even approaching the scales required for such a device).


Referencing sites such as www.americanantigravity.com does not constitute evidence, not by a long shot.





new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join