It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Big Muslim Money behind DaVinci Movie

page: 5
0
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 9 2006 @ 10:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by masterp
The Jewish domination of America is a taboo subject for Americans. They do not want to talk about it. They easily adopt any claim about Muslims and others, but it comes to the Jews, they pretend nothing is happening.


I can't pretend nothing is happening when this sort of propaganda (yes, you are doing the same as you accuse them of doing) bursts forth from someone's mind.

When we ignore such narrowmindedness, we might certainly allow terrible things to happen--things like genocide and deportation.

Balance.




posted on Jun, 29 2006 @ 01:22 PM
link   
Somewhere along the line, let it not become convenient to bash the funding of the movie for actually believing in anything the movie had to say. The book was not written by a Muslim. The guy who bankrolled the movie need not have anything to do with the content of the film - nothing wrong with a business deal!



posted on Jun, 30 2006 @ 08:31 AM
link   
HEy dont look at it as a muslim funded one, might be its time we look at the truth instead of following rules blind folded.
any ways muslims and christians were brothers who split in their early stages
the question is WHATS the truth try finding that






Originally posted by FlyersFan
According to this report it is a British Muslim who mostly
financially backed the DaVinci movie. hmmmm. Wonder
if we will see any of the 2 billion Christians around the
world riot and call for death to him and/or other muslims
since DaVinci is disrespectful to Christianity and is
considered blasphemous.

That's what we saw when a simple cartoon was printed
about Muhammed afterall. And this movie is so
much more than a simple cartoon in a small
'out of the way' country. (out of the way as opposed
to world wide - like this movie)

So .. did he back this movie because it was a potential
good moneymaker, or did he back it because he's
anti-Christian and wants to destroy Christianity?
Or both?? Or is this report wrong?

www.thechurchreport.com...


Mohammed Yusef's Invicta Capital put up most of
the estimated 200 million dollars it cost to make the film
version of Dan Brown's novel


And another source -
www.assistnews.net...


The Da Vinci Code movie qualified for an outgoing regime
of tax breaks because it was partially shot in the United Kingdom.
The British government is phasing out the tax incentives because
of allegations of abuse.

The British government thus is helping Mohammed to conduct a jihad
against Christians by promoting the Bible bashing, anti-Christian
propaganda in The Da Vinci Code.


And from the AP
www.thepath.fm...

Baehr told reporters at a Washington news conference, "I think
it's a very serious problem when people start funding movies and books
to attack somebody else's religious faith."

He said the financial backing for "The Da Vinci Code" reveals "a terrible
double standard" by Muslims who erupt in violent protests when they
believe their own faith is being attacked.


And the very short bio on the man from his company.
hmmmm - wonder what these other 'financial deals' are?
He's a lawer ...

www.invictacapital.co.uk...
More - he's expanding into Canada and America
www.playbackmag.com...

Leaseback maven and Invicta Capital founder Mohamed Yusef
is mostly responsible for the company's access and expertise. A former
director of leaseback financing at U.K. financing firm Matrix for the past
five years, Yusef decided to set out on his own earlier this year, taking
with him the bulk of his Matrix team and investor pool

Invicta home page (kinda bland 'front' page .. hmmmm)
www.invictacapital.co.uk...

[edit on 5/21/2006 by FlyersFan]



posted on Jun, 30 2006 @ 04:27 PM
link   
i see the conspiracy!

someone is conspiring to profit from controversy

my god, what have they done?!

honestly, anyone with the opportunity would bankroll any movie to make a buck



posted on Jul, 1 2006 @ 02:48 PM
link   

Originally posted by FlyersFan
According to this report it is a British Muslim who mostly
financially backed the DaVinci movie. hmmmm. Wonder
if we will see any of the 2 billion Christians around the
world riot and call for death to him and/or other muslims
since DaVinci is disrespectful to Christianity and is
considered blasphemous.

That's what we saw when a simple cartoon was printed
about Muhammed afterall. And this movie is so
much more than a simple cartoon in a small
'out of the way' country. (out of the way as opposed
to world wide - like this movie)

So .. did he back this movie because it was a potential
good moneymaker, or did he back it because he's
anti-Christian and wants to destroy Christianity?
Or both?? Or is this report wrong?

www.thechurchreport.com...


Mohammed Yusef's Invicta Capital put up most of
the estimated 200 million dollars it cost to make the film
version of Dan Brown's novel


And another source -
www.assistnews.net...


The Da Vinci Code movie qualified for an outgoing regime
of tax breaks because it was partially shot in the United Kingdom.
The British government is phasing out the tax incentives because
of allegations of abuse.

The British government thus is helping Mohammed to conduct a jihad
against Christians by promoting the Bible bashing, anti-Christian
propaganda in The Da Vinci Code.


And from the AP
www.thepath.fm...

Baehr told reporters at a Washington news conference, "I think
it's a very serious problem when people start funding movies and books
to attack somebody else's religious faith."

He said the financial backing for "The Da Vinci Code" reveals "a terrible
double standard" by Muslims who erupt in violent protests when they
believe their own faith is being attacked.


And the very short bio on the man from his company.
hmmmm - wonder what these other 'financial deals' are?
He's a lawer ...

www.invictacapital.co.uk...
More - he's expanding into Canada and America
www.playbackmag.com...

Leaseback maven and Invicta Capital founder Mohamed Yusef
is mostly responsible for the company's access and expertise. A former
director of leaseback financing at U.K. financing firm Matrix for the past
five years, Yusef decided to set out on his own earlier this year, taking
with him the bulk of his Matrix team and investor pool

Invicta home page (kinda bland 'front' page .. hmmmm)
www.invictacapital.co.uk...

[edit on 5/21/2006 by FlyersFan]
As a Muslim I can tell you that those of us part of the Islamic population see the DaVinci Code as blasphemous and thus we would never finance it. We see Jesus as a Prophet and as the Messiah and as a sinless man, this means he would have never gotten married to a prostitute like the DaVinci Code implies. Besides our boycott against the Danish has made sure that no one will copy the mistake of those cartoonists. Notice the media has taken precautions not to anger us.



posted on Jul, 1 2006 @ 03:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by paperclip
First of all, the idea that Jesus had kids didn't came from Muslims, it came from the christian world.


Do you have any documentation to back this up? Christians are those who believe in the God of the Bible, that the Bible is the inspired Word of God, and that Jesus is God's Only Begotten Son, the Lamb of God Who takes away the sin of the world.

I, for one, have never heard that any Christian believes Jesus was married and had children.

Though Dan Brown may not have intended it, I believe the Da Vinci code is harmful in general in the sense that it makes of Jesus "just another man" when we know He was the Only Begotten Son of God, born of a virgin, miracle worker, who was crucified for the salvation of all who would believe in Him. (We KNOW this, oh queenie, because the Bible tells us so.)

If that movie causes even one person to reject Christ as the Savior, I wouldn't want to be in Dan Brown's shoes.



posted on Jul, 1 2006 @ 03:42 PM
link   

Originally posted by Schwarzwald
[As a Muslim I can tell you that those of us part of the Islamic population see the DaVinci Code as blasphemous and thus we would never finance it. We see Jesus as a Prophet and as the Messiah and as a sinless man, this means he would have never gotten married to a prostitute like the DaVinci Code implies. Besides our boycott against the Danish has made sure that no one will copy the mistake of those cartoonists. Notice the media has taken precautions not to anger us.


You see Him as Messiah, then why are you calling those of us who do also "infidels"?

Oh, yes, we do certainly notice that the media has taken precautions not to anger you, have we ever!! I could almost admire the way the Muslims lit into that cartoon. A Christian's objections over a Jesus cartoon falls on deaf ears. Any idea why?

Now, you've made me almost wish He had married Mary Magdalene, just so I could point out the more forcibly Jesus did not have the opinion of women Muslims seem to.

Look what Mark 14 says of Him " 3 And being in Bethany in the house of Simon the leper, as he sat at meat, there came a woman having an alabaster box of ointment of spikenard very precious; and she brake the box, and poured it on his .. 4 And there were some that had indignation within themselves, and said, Why was this waste of the ointment made? ....... And they murmured against her.

6 And Jesus said, Let her alone; why trouble ye her? she hath wrought a good work on me..... 8 She hath done what she could: she is come aforehand to anoint my body to the burying. 9 Verily I say unto you, Wheresoever this gospel shall be preached throughout the whole world, this also that she hath done shall be spoken of for a memorial of her. "



posted on Jul, 1 2006 @ 03:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by curiousity
You see Him as Messiah, then why are you calling those of us who do also "infidels"?




Where does Schwarzwald call anyone an infidel?



posted on Jul, 8 2006 @ 08:10 AM
link   
And of course the bible is always right ?
and the Bible was written in English !
Osbert+



posted on Jul, 8 2006 @ 09:57 AM
link   
I read the divinci code, and i am reading Angels and demons now.
And the movie does no more damage than the book did. The movie dosent actualy discount christianity, just offers a different possible viewpoint.

Another thing, Muslims belive that jesus was a prophet, so to desicrate his divinity would also be very frowned upon in there community.



posted on Jul, 8 2006 @ 10:11 AM
link   


As a Muslim I can tell you that those of us part of the Islamic population see the DaVinci Code as blasphemous and thus we would never finance it. We see Jesus as a Prophet and as the Messiah and as a sinless man, this means he would have never gotten married to a prostitute like the DaVinci Code implies. Besides our boycott against the Danish has made sure that no one will copy the mistake of those cartoonists. Notice the media has taken precautions not to anger us.


your ignorance is showing. Anyone with any knowledge knows that the entire
prostitute myth was begun by Pope gregory and prepetuated by the RCC. Much the same as the myth of Muslims and their sheep and camels.




Besides our boycott against the Danish has made sure that no one will copy the mistake of those cartoonists. Notice the media has taken precautions not to anger us.


only because of the threat of bomings and other atrocities.

IMO every terrorist act should be met in kind. Im sure that after 2 or 3 parking lots
have been created the : tone " will change

to quote the papal legate at Beziers ca 1235 " Kill them all, let God sort them out."



posted on Jul, 8 2006 @ 10:18 AM
link   
In the 12th and 13th century the Pope, aided by the French king tryied to obliterate the Templars and their Cult of the Grail because it was in direct competition with the cult of the Trinity. They used some very nasty methods including " confession torture".
The church almost succeded and what ever was left of the Templars had to go underground or re-embrace the Christian Faith.
It is ironic that this book and film has come back to haunt them.
I do not believe that any Muslim would have intentionally promoted curiosity toward the Grail as it is counter to their religion also.
Osbert+



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 2  3  4   >>

log in

join