The Big FEMA Lie, The Towers Had A Concrete Core: PROOF, page 7
Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 23-5-2006 @ 12:50 AM by HowardRoark
Oh where, oh where is my concrete core?







Is it here?

www.archsd.gov.hk...

Or maybe it's here?

www.byrnegroup.co.uk...

Seriously, if they wanted to infill the space between the columns, why not use CMUs ("cinderblocks" to the layman)? They are a lot cheaper to install.


reply posted on 23-5-2006 @ 02:03 AM by HowardRoark
Originally posted by Christophera
Why are you trying to hide the way Americans were murdered? Do the rights and freedoms of Americans mean anything to you? Only truth will protect them.
. . .

This thread is about the concrete core.


Then stick to the subject of the thread, and stop with the personal attacks and insults, please.

www.nizkor.org...

That picture proves nothing, other than portions of the building took longer to collapse than others. Big deal.

Let me ask you this. If a portion of the building took slightly longer to collapse than the rest of the building, how can anyone argue that the total collapse was at "free fall" speeds?


What about the 17 foot thick walls?




[edit on 23-5-2006 by HowardRoark]

[edit on 23-5-2006 by HowardRoark]


reply posted on 23-5-2006 @ 11:09 AM by Christophera
Originally posted by HowardRoark
Originally posted by Christophera
Why are you trying to hide the way Americans were murdered? Do the rights and freedoms of Americans mean anything to you? Only truth will protect them.
. . .

This thread is about the concrete core.


Then stick to the subject of the thread, and stop with the personal attacks and insults, please.

www.nizkor.org...

That picture proves nothing, other than portions of the building took longer to collapse than others. Big deal.

Let me ask you this. If a portion of the building took slightly longer to collapse than the rest of the building, how can anyone argue that the total collapse was at "free fall" speeds?


What about the 17 foot thick walls?


Questions about your concern for our rights under our Constitution do not constitute an ad-hominem attack. Your inabilty to address the compromises to our rights and freedoms does far more damage to you than anything I've said. Show how your refusal to deal rationally with available information protects our Constitution.

I asked first. Support the tower core you assert stood.

Why do no steel columns protrude from the center area of the core of WTC 2? Your attempt to evade this question by stating that this picture is inadequate in not reasonable. Silhouetted vertical elements would be visible in it if they existed.



So you cannot try and obfuscate by asserting that I must answer first, I will answer your question.

Logically a 1300 foot tall wall will have a thick base. The core at the top was 2 feet thick and 17 feet thick at the base.

Now my question.

Also, why are no steel columns seen piercing the stairs, why are none seen to the right of the stairs where elevators were?


Pages: <<  4    5    6    7    8    9    10  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 13 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 6 days ago with 12 member flags
Wikipedia categorizes 9/11 truth as \'denialism\'
  Posted 17 days ago with 11 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 14 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 8 days ago with 6 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 17 hours ago, 190 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 12 hours ago, 107 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 8 hours ago, 81 replies