This is what I think: I think the English only rule is a waste of legislation. It borders on racism because a language is part of a person's culture. Taking away another's language is like robbing them of their heritage.
Who is suggesting "Taking away another's language"?
Borders on racism. That's a new argument from you.
However, for the rest of us that fit into the multi-cultural part of America, language is special and it attributes to the life and vivaciousness of the country.
Why do you continue to insult people here by implying that only you are the one, totally non-biased person on this board?
Imho, some people just feel that they want to rob other cultures of their identity to prove their patriotism and Americansm.
There probably are such people, but I haven't seen any of them here.
I may sound presumptuous, but I think I speak for a lot of people here who love the sound of a family speaking in their native tongue. When I go to the St. Anthony's festival, I feel like I'm in Rome. It adds to our greatness as a nation. So for you to suggest otherwise is an insult to many of us.


It's more of a transfer of heritage removal and not the actual removal of said heritage. 