posted on May, 16 2006 @ 09:15 PM
I have one, and just one question for all the people who believe it was a missile and not a plane that hit the Pentagon.
Assuming this is one great conspiracy and the 'powers that be' are lying to us, why on earth would they choose to fly a missile into the Pentagon
and then say it was a plane? Wouldn't it make more sense to, oh I don't know, fly a PLANE into the Pentagon if that's what they want the public to
think??? Surely if you were responsible for orchestarting this great lie, you'd want to make it as authentic as possible (assuming of course it is a
great lie). Why risk exposing the 'lie' by firing a missile into the Pentagon and then 'claiming' it was actually a plane. This makes no sense at
all and it seems many people are quite happy to ignore this question. WHY A MISSILE???
A plane hit the Pentagon, I think as much has been proven. We can argue about the motives, the circumstances, the impact, the outcome, but surely this
is one fact that should not be up for debate???