It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by infinite8
I'm not even arguing over whether there was or was not a passenger plane. I can simply state that this video does not show evidence of a Boeing passenger plane striking the pentagon. I am also asking that the government please release more tapes that provide actual evidence. I want the debates to stop, but this 1 released video of 85 videos, simply cannot be the best evidence available. How about an video from behind so that we can see the shot. Common, 84 more to go, give us something.
Originally posted by infinite8
................
Many of the tapes that were seized were from local businesses that had cameras. The majority were not pentagon owned.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Yet by giving all the videos from the cameras that are always recording the Pentagon, information can be gathered on what times are the cameras recording which areas, and what areas are not being recorded at what times, and that should remain a secret.
[edit on 19-5-2006 by Muaddib]
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Originally posted by Aris
So, PieMan and AgentSmith, what you are saying is that over a hundred or so seats and over 80 or so tons of alloys got vaporized into thin air but 66 of the 68 bodies' DNA on those seats and in those 80 or so tons withstood what those alloys didn't?
"We didn't find the plane but we found 98% of the DNA inside it"!!!
LOL!!!
Aris
I would imagine skin,bone and hair got shredded and thrown all over the place. Metal flying everywhere, bodies being thrown...it was probably like a meat grinder spewing bits and pieces all over. I really don't think it would take much to be able to read someones DNA. Fingernails, brain matter,bits of bone. Aris don't get me wrong, Im just like a lot of people here..I really don't know what occurred or wether or not it was a passenger plane or military plane but Im saying that it shouldn't be too hard to be able to identify the bodies using DNA if in fact they were present.
Pie
Originally posted by Muaddib
You need to present proof, otherwise all you are doing is making more wild claims and trying to be a victim to get some sympathy.
Originally posted by Muaddib
BTW the burden of proof lies on the people who claim there was no plane...
That might be because CCTV cameras are generally aimed at the ground and not pointing up in the air.
Originally posted by solidstate
Notice we never saw any footage of these attackes from stationary CCTV cameras?
This in itself is not evidence of a cover up.
Originally posted by solidstate
Bingo. It seems too many people are happy to jump on the 'it wasn't a plane' bandwagon and simply ignore all this evidence. So much solid, documented proof, and yet because the only video released is of low quality and doesn't show much, people are up in arms with theories of being lied to about what 'really' crashed. Great logic that.
And the theory that the wreckage was planted or scattered around the site afterwards - give me a break.
Frankly, I'd say the fact so much startling evidence is being IGNORED is an even bigger conspiracy in itself!!!
How is a camera from a hotel going to affect national security. Its a public area so anyone could look from there anyway. They might not even be looking at the Pentagon
Originally posted by Muaddib
You are asking for the government to make public where every camera is recording the Pentagon.
I would think that many enemies of the United States would be happy if such a request was granted.
Originally posted by Muaddib
There is a lot of red tape behind allowing evidence to be given to the public.
Again, how does that request disprove what the eyewitnesses saw, and the evidence of the aircraft fuselage which is seen in the pictures taken that day?...
Here is a photo of what seems to be the APU (Auxiliary Power Unit) of a 757.
[edit on 19-5-2006 by Muaddib]
You are clutching at straws now, those cameras are recording the security of the petrol station, hotel etc and not the pentagon, they have nothing to do with national security.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Yet by giving all the videos from the cameras that are always recording the Pentagon, information can be gathered on what times are the cameras recording which areas, and what areas are not being recorded at what times, and that should remain a secret.
[edit on 19-5-2006 by Muaddib]
Originally posted by solidstate
I guess the point I'm trying to make is that people shouldn't NEED any more evidence to prove it was a 757. Sure, the video is relatively inconclusive, but taking into consideration the PLETHORA of other evidence, I think it's fairly clear that it was what it was - a 757.
I'd LIKE to see some other footage, but I sure don't NEED to see it to dispel any doubts about it being a 757 that crashed into the Pentagon.
Originally posted by Muaddib
I can't make a comment on something I don't have more evidence about, and neither can you.
The fact remains that the evidence that we do have does shows that it was an aircraft which hit the Pentagon.
The following picture can put in perspective the size of the aircraft with the size of the Pentagon.
Just because there might be some videos which are missing doens't mean there was no aircraft which hit the Pentagon...
Again, if you are interested in the evidence then go ahead and read through those links i gave. This topic has been discussed quite a few times already, and the evidence which proves it was an aircraft which hit the Pentagon is overwhelming and clearer than the claims made by those who keep saying it wasn't an aircraft.
Originally posted by Flyer
How is a camera from a hotel going to affect national security. Its a public area so anyone could look from there anyway. They might not even be looking at the Pentagon
Originally posted by Muaddib
You are asking for the government to make public where every camera is recording the Pentagon.
I would think that many enemies of the United States would be happy if such a request was granted.
Cameras from outside the Pentagon would show a lot less of the Pentagon than those 2 clips already released.