It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Flight77.info - Pentagon video release imminent?

page: 16
1
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2006 @ 11:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by warpboost
ANOK, if they did something similair to what Operations Northwoods called for what happened to the passengers onboard? Are their families actors?


Who knows? I can't answer every nit picking question but check this out...

Look who the passengers were on flight 77...


Is it a just coincidence the most of the passengers on Flight 77 with military backgrounds were Navy and that the crash at the Pentagon happened in the Navy's command center which took the heaviest casualties?
If some of the passengers where involved with this conspiracy, could they still be alive and living under new identities? Where some of these passengers specifically selected to be on this flight as a way to eliminate them for "knowing to much"?


The pilot of flight 77:

"One of the true ironies of this crash is that it was into the Pentagon, where he worked for many years as a naval reserve officer," said Burlingame's brother, Brad, a tourism executive in West Hollywood, California. "The people that perished in that crash could very well have been friends and colleagues of his."


Passenger Michele M. Heidenberger

Family members said she was trained five years ago in how to deal with a hijacking.


Talking about passenger Bernard Brown Jr.

Is it just the strangest of strange coincidences that Bernard Jr.'s dad gave a lecture to him about death and dying the morning of his plane trip, took a "rare day off" that day from his office at the Pentagon, and that his son's hijacked flight "crashed" in the very spot that his office was in?


William E. Caswell

A third-generation physicist whose work at the Navy was so classified that his family knew very little about what he did each day.
They don't even know exactly why he was headed to Los Angeles on the doomed American Airlines Flight 77.


Also all the kids were on there way to an educational trip to the Channel island...
What did Northwoods say, Destroying an unmanned drone masquerading as a commercial aircraft supposedly full of "college students off on a holiday".

There's more read it all here:

thewebfairy.com...

[edit on 16/5/2006 by ANOK]




posted on May, 16 2006 @ 11:06 PM
link   
I was dying to read this thread while I was at work, but unfortunately, my work doesn't like ATS.... it's blocked.

So, I just finished reading this whole thread. I really really wanted to see a 757 in the released videos... I could FINALLY go on with my life, confident that the Government isn't trying to pull one over me.

:*(



So what's the score after reading this thread?

Conspiracy Theory Score: 95
The Official Story Score: 0



posted on May, 16 2006 @ 11:30 PM
link   
I'm sort of a watcher here but i have a suggestion. I'm sure some of you are good with videos and graphics. There is alot of videos of the towers being hit. Is there some way where it can be frame by frame like how the pentagon is to see what you can see in the shot within them 2 seconds like how the pentagon got hit? Because i'm seeing alot of replys saying you can't see much within 1 second of something going 500mph. Maybe we can somehow compare it with the ones going 500mph into the towers. Just a thought.
Hopefully that made sense, but don't know if that will help any or not.


d1k

posted on May, 16 2006 @ 11:41 PM
link   
These videos are a joke, you don't see anything at all exact the tip of "something" which honestly does not look like the nose of a plane to me!

Wheres the gas station video??

Wheres the hotel video??

They gave us the crappy 1 frame per 5 sec joke of a video. We're all suckers to believe they were going to actually release real videos that really show us what hit the pentagon.

[edit on 16-5-2006 by d1k]



posted on May, 16 2006 @ 11:47 PM
link   
Where is all of the confiscated video taken right after ?



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 12:35 AM
link   
I've been wondering that for a long time. Where is all the other video evidence that was so quickly confiscated by the government on the day of the event?

How were they so quickly able to confiscate every frame of video from every camera location, public and private, if this event was unexpected?

Think about it. According to the official version this was a surprise until less than a minute before impact. Yet, someone immediately mobilized the evidence concealers! How does that happen if this event caught them all by surprise?

[edit on 5/17/2006 by dubiousone]



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 12:41 AM
link   
I would like to see it, thats what I thought was going to be released. This video has been viewed many times before. Dosnt prove or disprove anything becuase the image of the "aircraft" invloved is a bucnh oof blurry pixels. Would be nice if we could get something of the same quality of the towers videos.



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 12:47 AM
link   
first off that video itself cant be trusted,, second seekerof has shown us why it couldnt have been a plane that hit the pentagon if the plane would have vaporized then how in gods name could it punch a small hole thru 6 layers of reinforced concrete walls ?? and form an exit hole.. did some research and found this site I think you should all check it out it makes more sense,,

I dont see any visual evidence of an aircract hitting this buidling iam however into military weapons and what could have done that type of strike is a cruise missile I also play realistic flight sim games on my pc and i doubt u can fly a 757 or whatever that low ..

i mean look at the vid the dam thing is almost at ground level, it just doesnt add up.. there have been

also there is a difference between the structure strenght and material used to build an f4 and that used to build a 757.. if u look at the after explosion theres basically not enough fire think about all the feul in the wings were talkin about a massive plane here also the impact supposedly wasnt head on it was angled.. but thats irrelevant because i highly doubt it was a large plane that struck this building..

if it was its not in this video..

link here
www.the7thfire.com...



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 12:59 AM
link   
"These are fools that men adore; both their Gods & their men are fools."

"I will give you a war-engine."

"With it ye shall smite the peoples; and none shall stand before you."

"I am the Hawk-Headed Lord of Silence & of Strength; my nemyss shrouds the night-blue sky."

"I am in a secret fourfold word, the blasphemy against all gods of men."



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:08 AM
link   
if anyone here dares to go deeper here is a link which shows the true scale of the "conspiracy"

www.startinglinks.net...



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird

9:36

Reagan Airport flight control instructs a military C-130 (Golfer 06) that has just departed Andrews Air Force Base to intercept Flight 77 and identify it. [Guardian, 11/17/2001; New York Times, 11/16/2001] Remarkably, this C-130 is the same C-130 that is 17 miles from Flight 93 when it later crashes into the Pennsylvania countryside (see 10:08 a.m.). [Star-Tribune (Minneapolis), 10/11/2002; Pittsburgh Channel, 10/15/2001] ... then the controller asked me what kind of plane it was. That caught us up, because normally they have all that information. The controller didn’t seem to know anything.” O’Brien reports that the plane is either a 757 or 767 and its silver fuselage means it is probably an American Airlines plane. “They told us to turn and follow that aircraft—in 20 plus years of flying, I’ve never been asked to do something like that.” [Star-Tribune (Minneapolis), 10/11/2002] The 9/11 Commission Reports that it is a C-130H and the pilot specifically identifies the hijacked plane as a 757. Seconds after impact, he reports, “Looks like that aircraft crashed into the Pentagon, sir.” [9/11 Commission, 7/17/2004]


That C-130 had a busy day. And the fireman who managed to outrun a plane moving at 500mph, wow, that's pretty good going.

For me, this video only strengthens the cruise missile hypothesis.



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:09 AM
link   
Look...

The video from the pentagon is a very low frame rate feed. I think some people are missing this point when trying to 'see the plane' in the images. My feeling is that the plane has entered the field of view, crossed the image, and exploded into the Pentagon, in the time it has taken for the camera to record one frame.

That fake video that is floating around here is completely ridiculous and does NOT show how the event SHOULD have appeared. For that video to be realistic, the plane would have to be moving at a VERY slow speed. The plane was in fact flying at an incredibly high speed which is why, I think, there is no obvious sign of it in the video. There is a vague blur - exactly what you'd expect from an object moving at incredible speed across the field of view.

As I asked in another thread, why the hell would the 'powers than be' risk everything by crashing anything OTHER than a plane into the Pentagon? Someone explain why they would have used a missile or small aircraft, rather than the full-size aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. If it was your job to stage this, and you wanted people to think you crashed a jumbo jet into the Pentagon, then why not just crash a freaking jumbo jet into the Pentagon?? Why use something else and risk exposing the whole 'deceit'?

It just makes no sense.



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:13 AM
link   
and if they truly were behind it, youd think they would have created some fake video, instead of releasing something just as useless, adding fuel to the conspiracy fires. the fact the video is so bad makes it more suspicious to folks.



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:23 AM
link   
crashing a real 757 into the pentagon would have made more of a mess its easier for them to crash a smaller object and say the plane was vaporized and thats that..

you see they like to blantly expose themselves to us all the time its so audacious we dont even realize it most people are either too brainwashed or lazy to find the truth. that how they get over there no resistance we just accept what ever the mainstream media spits out.. thats how they are able to release a video like this..

they have so much power that they could release a video of bush waving from a cockpit flying the plane straight into the wall and we still wouldnt accept it becaus its so unbelievable

its all smoke and mirrors.. magick. True mental ur under my spell magick. u have to be strong enought to see thru there BS.

"these are my personal views everyones entiled to there own opinion"



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:26 AM
link   
..........................what?



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by enoc777
crashing a real 757 into the pentagon would have made more of a mess its easier for them to crash a smaller object and say the plane was vaporized and thats that..

you see they like to blantly expose themselves to us all the time its so audacious we dont even realize it most people are either too brainwashed or lazy to find the truth. that how they get over there no resistance we just accept what ever the mainstream media spits out.. thats how they are able to release a video like this..

they have so much power that they could release a video of bush waving from a cockpit flying the plane straight into the wall and we still wouldnt accept it becaus its so unbelievable

its all smoke and mirrors.. magick. True mental ur under my spell magick. u have to be strong enought to see thru there BS.

"these are my personal views everyones entiled to there own opinion"


Oh I can see through their BS. But I feel there's a lot of BS on these forums too. I'm not questioning the motives of the people behind this, but it makes ZERO, I repeat ZERO sense to substitute a missile or small plane for a jumbo jet if you want the public to believe that it was indeed a jumbo jet. They were real jumbo jets that flew into the WTC, so why in the hell would they not use a real jumbo jet to crash into the Pentagon. Somebody explain this logic to me...



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:44 AM
link   
im not trying to convince anyone of anything.. just trying to express my feelings on the whole issue.. in my opinion there is no logic behind it.. also they dont care what you or i think only what suits there long term goals and agenda.. i know it makes no sense.. its designed to confuse u.. this thing goes pretty deep im not saying it was a missile either..

based on the vid which is wack cause thats like 5 years old.. theres no 757 in the vid so what gives? ask ur self these logical questions.

whats happening is peeps are so brainwashed by the system they actually start to reject all this and subconciouly support or lean toward what the gov is saying without even realising it..

the way the illuminati works is very complex if u dont understand there structure ur onyl nibbling at the skirt and not seeing the full picture and logic behind this whole thing..

the bottom line is the plane isnt there.. something hit the pentagon and penetrated thru six walls. that something may or may not be in this video so whats our conclusion ;

this video doesnt prove a dam thing.. especially the governments story of it being a plane.. if it was why is it that if i freeze frame it and go frame by frame where in gods name is the outline of the plane?

Rumsfeld in the interview right after actually may have slipped or said it on purpose that "they used a missile" when referring to the pentagon attack.

a cruise missile or jdam stand off penetrating weapon is more consistent with the type of punch holes that were discovered..

also if everything was vaporized how were they able to id the dna?? thats strange. unless im missing something here.

this whole 911 thing stinks to high hell which is probably where half the sould incarnating into our gov officails came from.

93



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by enoc777
im not trying to convince anyone of anything.. just trying to express my feelings on the whole issue.. in my opinion there is no logic behind it.. also they dont care what you or i think only what suits there long term goals and agenda.. i know it makes no sense.. its designed to confuse u.. this thing goes pretty deep im not saying it was a missile either..

based on the vid which is wack cause thats like 5 years old.. theres no 757 in the vid so what gives? ask ur self these logical questions.

whats happening is peeps are so brainwashed by the system they actually start to reject all this and subconciouly support or lean toward what the gov is saying without even realising it..

the way the illuminati works is very complex if u dont understand there structure ur onyl nibbling at the skirt and not seeing the full picture and logic behind this whole thing..

the bottom line is the plane isnt there.. something hit the pentagon and penetrated thru six walls. that something may or may not be in this video so whats our conclusion ;

this video doesnt prove a dam thing.. especially the governments story of it being a plane.. if it was why is it that if i freeze frame it and go frame by frame where in gods name is the outline of the plane?

Rumsfeld in the interview right after actually may have slipped or said it on purpose that "they used a missile" when referring to the pentagon attack.

a cruise missile or jdam stand off penetrating weapon is more consistent with the type of punch holes that were discovered..

also if everything was vaporized how were they able to id the dna?? thats strange. unless im missing something here.

this whole 911 thing stinks to high hell which is probably where half the sould incarnating into our gov officails came from.

93


As far as the plane not appearing on the video, read my post above. And if the plane's not there, can you tell me what IS there?

No, you probably can't......

I certainly think there is far more to September 11 than meets the eye, but I do believe it was a jumbo jet that hit the Pentagon.


SMR

posted on May, 17 2006 @ 01:52 AM
link   
Could be as simple as thinking, more people at WTC, so why chance trying to crash something other than the real deal.On the other hand, the area around the Pentagon has a much less populated amount of people.You can use a small replica and this event happens so fast, all you can gather is plane, silver, fast, explosion....then you see and hear on the news that THIS type of plane was hijacked and THIS type was also hijacked.So upon thinking of what you saw, you simply say yep, that must have been what I saw.
It may sound silly, but do none of you ever watch magic shows when they get you to think a certain way and it turns out it helps them pull off the trick? David Blane does it.Criss Angel does it.They all do it.There are many ways to manipulate the mind by simple words and pictures.
Now Im not saying this is some magic trick and hope someone doesnt come in here trying to say I am.I am not.I am only saying that it is not hard to 'trick' the mind.



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 02:24 AM
link   
NO plane ever hit the Pentagon.....it was a cruise missle, or other military jet aircraft or something small, it hit the Pentagon @ 500mph.....I mean people come on, it doesn't take a lot to figure out, THE CHANGE is coming............




top topics



 
1
<< 13  14  15    17  18  19 >>

log in

join