It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by warpboost
ANOK, if they did something similair to what Operations Northwoods called for what happened to the passengers onboard? Are their families actors?
Is it a just coincidence the most of the passengers on Flight 77 with military backgrounds were Navy and that the crash at the Pentagon happened in the Navy's command center which took the heaviest casualties?
If some of the passengers where involved with this conspiracy, could they still be alive and living under new identities? Where some of these passengers specifically selected to be on this flight as a way to eliminate them for "knowing to much"?
"One of the true ironies of this crash is that it was into the Pentagon, where he worked for many years as a naval reserve officer," said Burlingame's brother, Brad, a tourism executive in West Hollywood, California. "The people that perished in that crash could very well have been friends and colleagues of his."
Family members said she was trained five years ago in how to deal with a hijacking.
Is it just the strangest of strange coincidences that Bernard Jr.'s dad gave a lecture to him about death and dying the morning of his plane trip, took a "rare day off" that day from his office at the Pentagon, and that his son's hijacked flight "crashed" in the very spot that his office was in?
A third-generation physicist whose work at the Navy was so classified that his family knew very little about what he did each day.
They don't even know exactly why he was headed to Los Angeles on the doomed American Airlines Flight 77.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
Reagan Airport flight control instructs a military C-130 (Golfer 06) that has just departed Andrews Air Force Base to intercept Flight 77 and identify it. [Guardian, 11/17/2001; New York Times, 11/16/2001] Remarkably, this C-130 is the same C-130 that is 17 miles from Flight 93 when it later crashes into the Pennsylvania countryside (see 10:08 a.m.). [Star-Tribune (Minneapolis), 10/11/2002; Pittsburgh Channel, 10/15/2001] ... then the controller asked me what kind of plane it was. That caught us up, because normally they have all that information. The controller didn’t seem to know anything.” O’Brien reports that the plane is either a 757 or 767 and its silver fuselage means it is probably an American Airlines plane. “They told us to turn and follow that aircraft—in 20 plus years of flying, I’ve never been asked to do something like that.” [Star-Tribune (Minneapolis), 10/11/2002] The 9/11 Commission Reports that it is a C-130H and the pilot specifically identifies the hijacked plane as a 757. Seconds after impact, he reports, “Looks like that aircraft crashed into the Pentagon, sir.” [9/11 Commission, 7/17/2004]
Originally posted by enoc777
crashing a real 757 into the pentagon would have made more of a mess its easier for them to crash a smaller object and say the plane was vaporized and thats that..
you see they like to blantly expose themselves to us all the time its so audacious we dont even realize it most people are either too brainwashed or lazy to find the truth. that how they get over there no resistance we just accept what ever the mainstream media spits out.. thats how they are able to release a video like this..
they have so much power that they could release a video of bush waving from a cockpit flying the plane straight into the wall and we still wouldnt accept it becaus its so unbelievable
its all smoke and mirrors.. magick. True mental ur under my spell magick. u have to be strong enought to see thru there BS.
"these are my personal views everyones entiled to there own opinion"
Originally posted by enoc777
im not trying to convince anyone of anything.. just trying to express my feelings on the whole issue.. in my opinion there is no logic behind it.. also they dont care what you or i think only what suits there long term goals and agenda.. i know it makes no sense.. its designed to confuse u.. this thing goes pretty deep im not saying it was a missile either..
based on the vid which is wack cause thats like 5 years old.. theres no 757 in the vid so what gives? ask ur self these logical questions.
whats happening is peeps are so brainwashed by the system they actually start to reject all this and subconciouly support or lean toward what the gov is saying without even realising it..
the way the illuminati works is very complex if u dont understand there structure ur onyl nibbling at the skirt and not seeing the full picture and logic behind this whole thing..
the bottom line is the plane isnt there.. something hit the pentagon and penetrated thru six walls. that something may or may not be in this video so whats our conclusion ;
this video doesnt prove a dam thing.. especially the governments story of it being a plane.. if it was why is it that if i freeze frame it and go frame by frame where in gods name is the outline of the plane?
Rumsfeld in the interview right after actually may have slipped or said it on purpose that "they used a missile" when referring to the pentagon attack.
a cruise missile or jdam stand off penetrating weapon is more consistent with the type of punch holes that were discovered..
also if everything was vaporized how were they able to id the dna?? thats strange. unless im missing something here.
this whole 911 thing stinks to high hell which is probably where half the sould incarnating into our gov officails came from.