It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally quoted by XphilesPhan
The term "illegals" comes from wither a court ruling that describes people who gained entry into the country as ILLEGALS!!!
Stop turning this into a race issue....and if you were so concerned for these poor immigrants you wouldnt be advocating the continued exploitation of them by corporations, why do you think they prefer illegals?
Originally posted by ceci2006
Originally quoted by XphilesPhan
The term "illegals" comes from wither a court ruling that describes people who gained entry into the country as ILLEGALS!!!
Stop turning this into a race issue....and if you were so concerned for these poor immigrants you wouldnt be advocating the continued exploitation of them by corporations, why do you think they prefer illegals?
Do you have proof about the true orgins of the word, "illegals"?
To everyone else:
It's an issue of seeing people's true feelings. That's what I'm curious about. Race is out of the equation. If people were truly fair in their pursuit of all "illegals" then they would be as equally mad about the European "illegals" as the undocumented workers from South of the Border.
And, they would have the courage and fortitude to say "illegals" in the same breath as "Europeans". And, they would form a chapter to "drive those European illegals" out. Wouldn't they?
After all, you would easily help the INS or ICE detain those "European illegals" as you would South American undocumented workers, would you?
[edit on 16-5-2006 by ceci2006]
Originally posted by valkeryie
Wonder which states these national guardspeople will come from.
But I wonder what the cost will really end up being.
Originally posted by ceci2006
Be honest. You wouldn't even think of illegal immigration if it had a White face attached to it. But with a brown face....
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
When you label someone 'illegal' you stigmatize them.
That's not opinion, that's fact.
Originally posted by dgtempe
Bush fixes things the big Texas way!!!
The comeback kid" with approval ratings way up in the 30's again!!
If that isnt pathetic.
Originally posted by dgtempe
CNN probably did it on purpose.
Originally quoted by FlyersFan
You really need to get over yourself. All over this board you scream
the race card. If you had bothered to look at the links posted you would
see what illegals cost this country and why people need to stop it. If you
had bothered to look at the links posted you would see the BASIC
SOCIOLOGY behind allowing certain number of immigrants at a time
in regards to the economic health of a nation. If you had bothered to
read any of the posts you'd see that ILLEGAL means ILLEGAL .. it's
just that simple. That means ALL ILLEGALS.
You are a one trick pony. Racism.
Associated Press identified VDARE.com as an "immigration-focused Web magazine" -- not noting that it publishes "white nationalists"
In an April 28 Associated Press article, Hispanic affairs writer Laura Wides-Munoz identified right-wing website VDARE.com only as an "immigration-focused Web magazine," even though the site publishes the work of "white nationalists," according to its editor. The AP also failed to note that VDARE writer Bryanna Bevens, whom the article quoted, has made disparaging remarks about Hispanics, in which she advocated the creation of "National Hispanic Crime Prevention Month," and warned of "Mexico's conquest of the United States."
Wides-Munoz included a quote from Bevens in her article, which described the negative reaction of some Americans to a recently released Spanish-language rendition of The Star-Spangled Banner:
Bryanna Bevens of Hanford, Calif., who writes for the immigration-focused Web magazine Vdare.com, said the remix particularly upset her."It's very whiny. If you want to say all those things, by all means, put them on your poster board, but don't put them on the national anthem," she said.
But as Media Matters for America noted, VDARE.com is more than an "immigration-focused Web magazine." Named for Virginia Dare, the first child of English descent born in the New World in the 16th century, the site publishes the work of "white nationalists," according to a statement by Peter Brimelow, who operates VDARE.com through his nonprofit organization, the Center for American Unity. In 2003, the Southern Poverty Law Center added VDARE.com to its list of hate websites. VDARE's FAQ page contains three links -- one that leads to an explanation of its name and two that offer instructions on how to report an illegal alien. A search for the word "white" on VDARE returns articles with headlines such as "Do White Men Need Their Own Political Party?," "Harvard Hates The White Race?," "White Americans: Second-Class Citizens," and "No Democracy For Whites In The New America."
Keeping America White
Fast forward to 2003. Once a relatively mainstream anti-immigration page, VDARE has now become a meeting place for many on the radical right.
One essay complains about how the government encourages "the garbage of Africa" to come to the United States. The same writer says once the "Mexican invasion" engulfs the country, "high teenage birthrates, poverty, ignorance and disease will be what remains."
Another says that Hispanics have a "significantly higher level of social pathology than American whites. ... In other words, some immigrants are better than others." Yet another complains that a Jewish immigrant rights group is helping "African Muslim refugees" come to America.
Brimelow's site carries archives of columns from men like Sam Francis, who is the editor of the newspaper of the white supremacist Council of Conservative Citizens, a group whose Web page recently described blacks as "a retrograde species of humanity."
It has run articles by Jared Taylor, the editor of the white supremacist American Renaissance magazine, which specializes in dubious race and IQ studies and eugenics, the "science" of "race betterment" through selective breeding.
Originally posted by ceci2006
But the Minutemen have been shown to be racist and violent.
If they weren't, the Southern Poverty Law Center or the Anti-Defamation League would not be tracking them. They would not have legal observers if they were truly above the board.
WyrdeOne ... when someone is illegal then that's what they are ... illegal.
That's not stigmatizing ... that's stating a fact.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
When you label someone 'illegal' you stigmatize them.
That's not opinion, that's fact.
stig·ma·tize ( P ) Pronunciation Key (stgm-tz)
tr.v. stig·ma·tized, stig·ma·tiz·ing, stig·ma·tiz·es
To characterize or brand as disgraceful or ignominious.
To mark with stigmata or a stigma.
To cause stigmata to appear on.
dictionary.reference.com...
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — President Bush's planned deployment of National Guard troops to the Mexican border would last at least two years with no clear end date, according to a Pentagon memo obtained Friday by The Associated Press.
Now we should worry about hurting their feelings?
The thorny issue of illegal migrants
Put the words "illegal" and "immigrant" next to each other in the same sentence and you've usually got a political row in the making.
During the 2005 general election, a good deal of hot air was expelled trying to work out how many unauthorised migrants were living within our shores.
And in the last couple of weeks, we've seen the ejection of a home secretary over his failure, in the eyes of the prime minister, to get a grip on an enormous blunder that led to serious foreign criminals not being deported.
Now new Home Secretary John Reid has come under fire after one of his top officials, David Roberts, plainly told MPs on Tuesday there was little point hunting individuals who overstay their visa.
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Of course not, but you should worry about losing your own feelings. Can you answer my original question now? If you saw a truckload of people being detained and taken away, and you were told by an authority figure that they were 'illegals', would you cheer and be happy, or would you want to know more about the circumstances of those people in the truck? What if they were white and suburban-looking, would that influence your judgement at all?
If you see nothing wrong with it, rock on, seriously, I bear you no emnity. I just hope you and everybody else feels the same when you're forced to wear one not of your own choosing. Then y'all will really have my respect.