Did a missile hit the pentagon on 911?, page 8


Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 3-9-2004 @ 05:34 PM by DJAghetto
Originally posted by MOC
Were does this kind of stuff get started (they must be laughing
pretty hard)

That is the kind of damage that 11,466 gallons of JP4 can do !
Way more than any missle.

right here you can see the wreckage of the 757.

www.geoffmetcalf.com...

Plus I spent 8 years in USAF,and have worked for Boeing for 20
and I don't remember us fabricating underwing Pylons for Missle
rails to hang on . lol Plus the wiring harness's to apply power to it.

[edit on 9/3/2004 by MOC]


im sry but if u did work for boeing then u would know that u dont build planes out of very thin metal. just cuz u were in the USAF, doesnt mean u know everything thats going on! if u look at the second plane that hit the towers, in slow motion, you would realize that the 767 launches a missile prior to impact!
as u should know, the USAF have KC767s. maintenance staff who were "in on it" could easily install a missile pod/canopy under its wings.


reply posted on 4-9-2004 @ 01:58 AM by psilocin
The U.S. government fakers have their disaster at their hands for the Pentagon that was hit on 9-11-1 by a USAF cruise missile (FBI inside information, via German national security police to this author; further proven by all evidence if scrupulously examined).

The Pentagon commissioned, after 9-11, a Building Performance Report. For months, experts studied the specifics of the building damage, the plane size, and compiled the report. Engineers under Dr. Mete Sozen of the engineering faculty of Purdue University compiled in hundreds of hours of supercomputer simulation a model of how the plane (alleged flight AA 77) crashed into the Pentagon.

Their model is on the internet under the name "Purdue Simulation", easy to find via Google etc.

At the time the Purdue Simulation was finalized and published on the internet, the following still photo announces to the viewer’s eye what happened (my Exhibit „A“):

This still image results from a supercomputer simulation of the engineering faculty at Purdue University after months of study of all measurements of building and plane. It is precise to the inch in ist sizes and proportions.

Some months after the Purdue Simulation was finalized, the Will Morris photo Nr. 1 was published by sources near to the government reportedly at Stanford University (Sarah Roberts). It shows us the above plane left the below hole:

We see several broken windows where a Revell kit model plane could have flown in but no Boeing 757 passenger plane as shown in the Purdue Simulation. All there is in terms of a „hole“ is a crack in the facade at the level of the undamaged Pentagon lawn, clearly no higher than the floor line of the ground floor.

Mysteriously, the plane size as meticulously calculated by the Purdue University engineers in no way fits under the crack.

Here is another photo, taken minutes after impact by a member of the Marine Corps Photo Lab (Cpl. Jason Ingersoll), which finished the government theory of a „Boeing 757 hit) off for good:

Column 15 is immediately to the right of the large orange spot-fire from the missile explosion. The seeming „pillars“ to the right of this that are pushed to the right are the narrow sides of support walls.

Walls get pushed sideways by shaped charges from missiles. If a plane had physically collided with the building, it would have pushed the support walls into the building and not displaced them sideways. A plane of the size shown above would have left a large hole in the facade above the ground floor level.

We see the 6 foot high cable spool not displaced by the in-whooshing „plane“. Take these 6 feet off the free air space that the plane had to damage the facade. And you will quickly realize that the government is lying through its teeth.

Now you may understand why a soldier testified that he smelled cordite from the explosion – a plane would have smelled of kerosene not cordite.

Now you may understand why only one single small jet engine was found (parts) and not the two 9-foot tall turbofans of a Boeing 757.

Now you may understand why Donald Rumsfeld initially stated that a bomb had hit the Pentagon.

Now you may understand why the clean-up team found parts of a cruise missile but no parts of a Boeing 757.

Now you may understand why - which I doubt in the first place - the DNA tests identified all passengers but none of the Arab hijackers.

Now you may understand why no luggage was ever found.

thewebfairy.com...

============================================


physics911.org...


[edit on 4-9-2004 by psilocin]



reply posted on 12-3-2005 @ 01:29 AM by nospam
Boeing 757, landing gear!

100%

See image!



www.gruporisa.com...

I'm a new member here. I think the image in abovetopsecret.com (source?) of the Landing gear strut in the Pentagon and the image of the landing gear of a Boeing 757 (left side) match exactly.

Comments?


files.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Images of the landing gear of a Boeing 757
www.airliners.net...
perso.wanadoo.fr...



reply posted on 12-3-2005 @ 03:36 AM by ashmok
Originally posted by scorchio123
I know DNA burns ups at about 39 degrees, and steel melts at about 1500 degrees.


That's completely untrue. DNA can be recovered from teeth or bones even after prolonged exposure to fires. It's even just about possible to extract DNA from cremated remains (Japan did it recently, see
www.japantimes.co.jp...), that's after being exposed to a temperature of probably around 1600 degrees F for 90 minutes.

As for the plane debris, most of it wasn't steel. Lesser metals like aluminium have a melting point of around 1220 degrees, that's less than the temperature used during a cremation.


reply posted on 17-7-2008 @ 01:42 PM by Anonymous ATS
911 was the second attack on the United States by our government. The first was in Oklahoma City. Has anyone ever wondered why McVay would have plastered his name all over the rental agreement? Has anyone ever wondered why he was put to death months after his sentencing when hundreds of other death row inmates wait decades while the appeals process drags on and on and on? Why was the building leveled before a forensic investigation could be mounted? Oh thats right to protect the public from the trauma the awful sight caused the public. McVay was guilty of delivering a truck to the building and driving a car without a license plate. Hmm. Now if I had the knowledge to build a bomb, place a truck in front of a federal building and detonate that truck remotely I would have at the very least used an alias on the rental agreement and had the wisdom to have a license plate on my get away car. Unless he was simply following orders from a controller who gained his trust and who later pushed the death penalty forward to keep McVay quiet. What laws were put in place after the Oklahoma city bombing? I'll bet they had something to do with increasing law enforcement surveilance.

911 was meant to makes fearful of an enemy who though vicious, mean and nasty, was not capable of bringing down two massive structures built to withstand the impact of aircraft. The Pentagon was hit with a cruise missle, otherwise why have we the people not been allowed to see the surveilance videos that should have easily proven the case the government wants to sell us? Why not use CG to fake it? Because they know that any expert technician familiar with CG would tear it to pieces and then they'd have to answer the questions raised by making a fake video. No ladies and gentlemen our governmental law enforcement agencies have attacked us with the purpose in mind of reminded us just how important their existence is to us. They have to fabricate an enemy and even attacks to prove just how vulnerable we truly are and how necessary it is for them to remove our rights to bare arms, as we are an untrustworthy bunch of miscreants.

What they fail to realize is that we the people are no longer the illiterate buffoons we were mere decades ago. They are acting on the assumption that we are still gullible and easily led by the nose. Nazi Germany did the same thing to take control of the population in order to exersize absolute control over the population for their protection. Ironically that same need to protect the people of Germany from enemies of the state led to the most destructive war in human history and the ultimate destruction of Germany and the loss of millions and millions of lives.

We need protection from our enemies certainly. Who is the enemy we need protection from? Who is truly in charge of the United States of America? Who lied to us about the Gulf on Tonkin, which led us into the Vietnam war?

We must remind ourselves that we are still an armed population. We have the control to take our country back. It may soon become a necessity to take it back by force.

AMEN
Pages: <<  5    6    7    8  >>    ^^TOP^^



Why the Pentagon?
  Posted 3 days ago with 12 member flags
NEVER FORGET 9-11….Maybe we SHOULD forget.
  Posted 11 days ago with 11 member flags
Personal Theory on The Twin Towers Plane Pilots
  Posted 0 days ago with 8 member flags
The 9/11 Hijackers: Fraud in Official Video Exhibits Uncovered
  Posted 1 days ago with 7 member flags
Note from trapped workers surfaces 10 years after 9/11
  Posted 1 days ago with 6 member flags
Where were you when the world stopped turning...
  Posted 2 days ago with 4 member flags