It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Rove indicted in Plame leak case (truthout.org rumor)

page: 6
3
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 13 2006 @ 05:58 PM
link   
Regardless of the fact that Roves indicment will not come soon, it shall come sooner or later. Truthout made a mistake and has apologized for it, however, what should be refurbished is that Leopold had 5 credible sources as forestlady prompted, which begs the question, Seekerof, why will you not contest those?

Luxifero




posted on Jun, 15 2006 @ 10:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by Luxifero
Truthout made a mistake and has apologized for it, however, what should be refurbished is that Leopold had 5 credible sources as forestlady prompted, which begs the question, Seekerof, why will you not contest those?
Luxifero


IMO, contesting the story does contest Leopold's assertion that he had 5 credible sources.

Also IMO, not only did Leopold not have "five credible sources," he didn't even have one "credible source."

There is a huge difference between "making a mistake," as some here have characterized Leopold's reportage, and out-and-out lying which appears to be the correct characterization of Leopold's reporting, at least with this story.

Here at ATS, what Leopold did is looking more and more like a dog owner "pretending" to throw a ball, thus tricking his pet into chasing off after a non-existent toy. Real funny. Well, in this case it is sorta funny, watching all the Bush haters here chasing off after a non-existent indictment!


Harte



new topics
 
3
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join