This title might be a little deceiving. I actually was wondering which 3 "aspects" of the 9/11 conspiracy theory do each of you think is the best
evidence or best supported by evidence, and are the most believable over the government's version of the story (even if all of them are more
believable than the government's). I'm aware that most of this is what you've heard before, but I'm curious of what 3 points you believe are the
most supported and believable.
My first would be the existence of the Northwood Documents. This is one of my favorites because it proves to all those people out there who say it's
impossible that the government would do such a thing, proof that it has AT LEAST
crossed the minds of some
members in our
government in the past.
For example, when Cinnamon Stillwell wrote this in her editorial:
Whatever one's criticisms of the administration and its approach to the war on terrorism, one would have to be awfully cynical to believe that
it would kill or allow thousands (at the least) of Americans to die, simply to accumulate additional powers.
(You can read her complete article here:
I wondered if she had at least read, or knew the general ideas in the Northwood Documents. I believe this is necessary knowledge when trying to
convince anyone of the conspiracy, since most disregard it completely, believing that the government could receive no possible gains from such a
Second, I find certain aspects of the Pentagon case more questionable than that of the World Trade Center. For the World Trade Center attacks, many
people provide understandable arguments, but even some of the most "enlightened" people can't seem to answer certain questions about the Pentagon.
Mechanics have said that the "small hole" in the Pentagon wall was due to the wings "folding backward due to the hardness of the walls", but few
have even tried to explain why they managed to obtain DNA evidence of the victims of the crash, yet the black boxes were "incinerated". I find this
hard to believe. During the Katrina incident, police and government officials were worried that they wouldn't be able to obtain DNA remains because
they were damaged by the heat and water in the area.
People who work in such fields know that in heat and water the identification window is very narrow.
So if they had a hard time or were even worried about having a hard time finding any DNA evidence in just moderate heat and water, how is it that the
DNA at the crash site survived while the black box, built to withstand these types of things, was destroyed.
Basic info on Black Boxes and their 3 layers:
This device is engineered to withstand extreme heat, violent crashes and tons of pressure
* Aluminum housing - There is a thin layer of aluminum around the stack of memory cards.
* High-temperature insulation - This dry-silica material is 1 inch (2.54 cm) thick and provides high-temperature thermal protection. This is what
keeps the memory boards safe during post-accident fires.
* Stainless-steel shell- The high-temperature insulation material is contained within a stainless-steel cast shell that is about 0.25 inches (0.64
cm) thick. Titanium can be used to create this outer armor as well.
Kind of weird to me; but then again, that won't convince the average American of anything.
The third "aspect" I like the most is the fact that the only films that allegedly captured the video of the "airplane" hitting the Pentagon were
filmed by cameras at a nearby gas station and hotel. Immediately following the crash, the videos were allegedly confiscated, I believe by either the
FBI or CIA; and the people who were 'in control' of them were told to never speak of them. Furthermore, these videos were never released; aside
from a measly 5 frames that the government showed us. To further support the fact that a plane might not have struck the Pentagon, or at least not
the same one we were told, is the fact that NO large pieces of debris were found at the crash site. Unusual, since just about every other airplane
crash in history has lleft a distinguishable, fairly large piece of the engine, parts of the wings and turbines, and an array of other parts. Even in
the investigation of TWA 800, which mysteriously and instantly exploded; and was spread across the ocean floor for weeks or even months before being
found; all large parts of the plane were found. In fact, they managed to put the entire plane back together from the parts found across the ocean
floor. Since the plane exploded, it was also subject to extreme heats, and other natural conditions. I find it harder to believe that an airplane
actually crashed into the Pentagon every day.
Anyways, which aspects about the 9/11 attacks do you guys believe are the most believable? Is it certain witness reports about events, contradictions
within official reports, video footage, common sense, etc.?
I know this is kind of repetitive of information that has been posted in the past on various articles, but I find it interesting what each different
person believes to be some of the most crucial aspects to proving that the government version of what happened is a complete lie.