posted on May, 12 2006 @ 11:50 AM
Originally posted by Crazy_Mr_Crowley
Quite an interesting interview to watch. Although too bad they didn't talk about how the original draft stated that the Neocons needed a Helpful
Pearl Harbour for their goals.
The document you refer to, "Rebuilding America's Defenses," is available for download in .pdf format at
. In it, you will find that the "Pearl Harbor" reference you
mention is not in the least the "sinister" prediction that so many whackos on the web proclaim it to be.
This Pearl Harbor reference, which you seem to be implying was only in the "original draft," regards the time frame involved in (imagine, an
on-topic topic!) rebuilding America's defenses
. The phrase comes up in part of the paper where the PNC concedes that a complete overhaul of
the defense structure could take decades, absent a pearl Harbor-like event, which event resulted in (there it is again) a rebuilding of America's
on a massive scale and in an unprecedented timeframe.
IOW, this completely innocent remark has absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. The attacks of 9/11 have not
resulted in a complete
and speedy overhaul of our defensive capabilities, structure and weaponry, which was the subject of (believe it or not) "Rebuilding America's
Typically, and I could be wrong, it is (to say the least) useful for a person to actually read
a document before attempting criticism of that