Remind me again of your gun laws., page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 23-5-2006 @ 08:12 AM by donwhite
JungleMike Posts: " . . the National Guard confiscating guns during Katrina did alarm me. I have thought hard about what I would do I such a situation and it's not easy . . I think I would try to get ID numbers from the applicable troops and some form of receipt. I'm certainly NOT going to break any law by resisting or heaven forbid, firing on US troops/law-enforcement. If I can ID who took my guns, I will make THEM accountable later. . "[Edited by Don W]


If 'Martial Law' had vbeen declared by the appropriate authority, then thereafter there can be only one armed group permitted. Usually the NG or police. If one was unwisely and obviously armed, despite the ML declaration, then confiscation is the only solution. The soldier on the scene is not obliged to do anything but follow his or her orders. ID is for the movies, and receipts for the birds. ML is not the time or the place for re-negotiations. As for accountability, that would be handled through the courts afterwards, but you can guess demands are not going to be well received. Insurance policies generally exclude losses during ML. Advice? "Leave the guns at home, son, leave your guns at home." Kenny Rogers.

posted by orangetom1999

Don White, I am going to say this again . . about Weaver . . cutting a shotgun barrel to the wrong length does not warrant killing Weaver' wife, son or Dog. Was not Randy Weavers wife holding a child when she was shot?? Think it through. I do fault the authoritys. Very poor leadership . . [Edited by Don W]


I do not recall how many days Weaver willfully endangered the lives of his family and pets by breaking yet another law. It is the law of the land which says when a duly authorized officer orders you to stop, stand aside, and submit to arrest, that you are required to do so. If you choose to disobey, that is called "resisting arrest." Also a crime. The government paid "damages" to Weaver for the unintended loss of life. The settlement was prompted more because local attitudes made a fair trial (in a prospective jury trial) unlikely. There was no legal requirement to pay damages to Weaver. He and he alone caused his losses.


As to Ellian Gonzolez...do not ever try to put on class warfare or politics on me...in the manner you do....Rich Vs Poor..is the ultimate cheap politics to me..and very overdone..in the last two elections. It is the ultimate cop out to me. It is like bottom feeding. IT is cheap politics.


Demogauging politicians find it all to easyto"jerk around" an uninformed citizenry.


I have no doupt that this boy was caught up in politics . . I dont agree with this either . . very poor leadership on the Government side. All the Governments involved.


Only the US government was involved. Florida had no jurisdiction on an illegal immigrant. The elected and appointed representatives of the United States of America cannot sumit to or be thwarted by the old, worn out political aganda of a bunch of disgruntled (and rich) emigres.


As to Waco . . once again 80 people killed.



I believe the tragic outcome at Waco was both caused by and greatly aided by David Karesh - not the FBI or BATF - who poured gasoling on those 'good' folks.



This is poor leadership . . on all levels . . from the top down. No matter what David Koresh did ..it does not warrant killing some 80 people. I do not know what you could possibly be thinking by statements like this Don White.


I forgot how long the US Government waited for David Karesh to obey the laws of the land. At some point in time, you have to stop humoring an adult who acts like child. The entire tragedy is properly laid at David Karesh's feet and those who opted to die with him. It was an example of good leadership at all levels.



[edit on 5/23/2006 by donwhite]


reply posted on 23-5-2006 @ 09:33 AM by orangetom1999
Northwolf,
I am not particularly enamoured with the public having silencers. There is little reason for them in my opinion though I understand your quandry about licensing them. People tend to watch to many movies without thinking abou the details involved. Most silencers ..even the professional ones are good for only so many shots..then require maintnence..parts replacement..etc. Another thing..only the most well made professional silencers are long range tools. Most are made for close range applications.
I myself am a machinist by trade..silencers are not difficult to manufacturer at all unless you are trying to make a reusable and very effecientquiet one ..this requires more attention to details. Most peoples do not have this level of skills. Yes one can make disposable ones very very quickly. Knowlege of handloading ammunitions also helps.

Don White..I'll say this again ..since it keeps going over your head in lieu of the Government/professional side of the fence. Randy Weaver and what happened at Ruby Ridge..does not excuse the unprofessionalism of the Government peoples at all levels..right up to the White House/Department of Justice. Nothing done warrants the killing of Randy Weavers wife, son or dog. Especially since he was surrounded by professionals and so equipped with the latest gadgetery and gimickery. THe total irony of this is that Randy Weaver ..the person they were out to get survived and the rest died...very unprofessional job...very unprofessional.
I'll clarify this for you in case you missed it...the one they were out to get and the one you mentioned ..is alive...They got everyone else...get the point yet???? THese are supposed to be professionals....!!!!! From the top down..professionsals!!!

In the case of Waco, Texas...they killed everyone....everyone....everyone. Combatants as well as non combatants. A very professional job...very professional.
Including the coverup and the spin.
Oh..by the way..I overlooked this in your previous post...is it our habit in this country to kill crazies..or do we institutionalize them?? You need to think before you spin. Nevertheless...it does not once again warrant the killing of 80 people.

Your position is .." at some time the authority of the courts have to be recognized"
What happened to the value and preciousness of life...does it go out the window in the face of political expediency????

In Below Top Secret ..under the Rant Category ...thread on Jacksonville,Florida murder capital of the USA taking the place of Houston , Detroit. Here you try to make the case for removal of guns in the hands of Americans implying the value of life.. Yet here in this thread..in the face of government/political expediency you dismiss government incompetancy and loss of life..for politics...no value to life in these cases..clearly. This will not wash on your part..by people who read and can see this trend line in your reasoning. YOur reasoning is perfectly logical...and reasonable to those who see only one side...to those who can see both sides..it doesnt make good nonsense. Life is either a valuable commodity or it is not...
Historically...always..when politics enters the picture..the value of life goes down...it is not valuable in the face of political expediency...this is historically demonstratable...over and over in history. Always..without exception.
This is the clear historical fingerprint of logical reasonable men. Without exception.


Thanks,
Orangetom


reply posted on 23-5-2006 @ 09:54 AM by dr_strangecraft
In TX, the laws vary slightly by county, and most of the power is put into the hands of a grand jury, to decide what you can be charged with.

In the urban areas, you will get in trouble for having a firearm in your car. There's a law in TX that if you are traveling more than 2 counties from your home, you can carry a gun for protection. It's important to note that most counties in TX are 25-75 miles across; so you actually have to be traveling. When the HOUSTON PD has tried to hassle visitors from rural areas, the grand juries have asked whether the person had suitcases, etc., and "no billed" (refused to formally charge) the defendant, without which the prosecutor cannot procede to trial.

It's illegal to carry a gun in liquor stores, hospitals, schools, county buildings etc. Other buildings can be declared a "No Gun Zone," by the owner, and it's a crime to carry a gun there.

On the other hand, in rural TX, you also see signs that say "Guns Welcome! Help Us Deter Crime!" It really varies with the locality and the attitudes in that spot.

There was a notorious case in TX in the 1990's, that Ted Koppell raised hell with on "Nightline." A guy in rural Dallas County heard a noise in his driveway at 3 in the morning. He had defaulted on the bank payments on his pickup. He saw a guy trying to force the lock on the truck, and the homeowner shot him.

The homeowner told the grand jury that in his mind, the bank would never believe it if the truck was stolen---they'd think he sold it and was trying to collect insurance. The man said he shot because of that. He shot the guy in the leg, but it hit an artery and the guy died.

It turns out that the "thief" was a "repo man," hired by the bank to collect the pickup. He had made no legal attempt to contact the owner or confiscate the pickup, and was known for just stealing vehicles the bank wanted back.

The grand jury "no-billed" the homeowner, and told the judge that repo or not, the man was a thief under the law, and the homeowner was not under an obligation to risk his own life by announcing his attention to shoot.

Ted Koppell railed about it for weeks, especially to the overseas press. His attitude has helped fuel the perception of texans as trigger-happy retards, or criminally-insane bounty hunters and repo-men.

I would also point out that, along with a high ratio of gun ownership (~50% of all homes statewide contain a gun), Texas has the lowest rate of "home invasions" in the nation.

Likewise, Texas DPS/Highway patrol, and rural police tend to be especially polite, since about half of all cars in rural areas contain a firearm as well. If you've ever been stopped by state police in Massachussetts or another anti-gun state, you'll instantly notice the disdain cops there have for tax payers.

Concealed Carry Permits
For $200 dollars plus instructor fees, you can take a 6-week course and be certified to carry a concealed pistol. There are extensive background checks, and I think they register the gun you train with, although you are permitted for any pistol in the same category (revolver or semiauto). You also have to get the sheriff's permission.

In addition, because of the background check, you are allowed to buy guns without any waiting period (although they'll check to see if you're wanted).

Since the program was implemented 10 years ago, there have only been 4 cases of a permit-holder being charged with misuse of a pistol. All 4 have been found guilty and sentenced. There are probably 100,000 Texans with permits.

When I last worked in Law enforcement, CCP-holders were much more accurate with their weapons than police themselves. I think your odds of being shot by a stray bullet from a cop was like, 11%. While a bullet from a CCP-holder hit a buystander about 4% of the time.

There have been about 10 cases in 10 years where an officer was being assaulted by criminals, and a CCP-holder came to the defense of police, and either drove off the attackers, or helped arrest them.

Also, in the Two Texas episodes where someone went "postal," private gun-owners either shot the perp (at the Luby's in Garland Texas), or fired back at the assailant and forced him to take cover and quit shooting people ( the University of TX in 1967).

In response to someone who posted that you could kill people in rural areas: this is the main reason why eveyone is armed out in the sticks. Where the police have a 2-hour response time, it's up to you to fend off any attackers. Imagine what it is like to live where there are no police---you'd be fairly paranoid, too. And own some good dogs, as well.
.


reply posted on 23-5-2006 @ 11:00 AM by orangetom1999
Great post..thanks again.

First off ...let me say..I have no beef with the authorities per se...Police in particular. They have a difficult job and are often caught inbetween the local realitys and political necessity. By political necessity I mean carrying out the political necessity of any particular administration. Not a position I envy in anyone. This would make thier job doubly hazardous. The public requirement and then the political will which changes like the wind and fashion of the day.

I do have a beef with the political will of different administrations which changes like the wind...for political reasons..not necessarily the benifit of the public. I strongly disapprove of this type of political whoredom. I also do not believe in the benovelant tendency of governments..I believe in the natural tendency of governments twords mischief for political reasons..not for the benifit of the public welfare.

I agree with you about people owning guns..particularly in the country...where the local constabulary is hours away. People out in these places tend to be more independent and self sufficient. People intending to violate the law...need to think further when dealing with these types of peoples. It would be wise of them.

Problems with people carrying concealed in this state also have been very low..almost non existant. The cases here where people use their firearms to protect themselves and their property are almost never reported as compared to the sensationalism promoted by the media and politics when crimes are reported. This slant is deliberately cultivated for political reasons/expediency.

I agree with you in your post that people who practice regularly with thier firearms have more accuracy when using them than the others. It is a sad state of affairs which happens so often that those using thier firearms in the carrying out of crimes or breaking the law often are such lousy shots that they kill or injury many bystanders. This has been amply demonstrated in this town many times.
I do not believe this is justification as so many are wont to attempt to use or misuse...to warrant taking the firearms away from people who dont commit crimes or break the law. All this type of thinking and practice does historically is entrench career politicians and career political partys. It never improves the safety of the public.

Here in this state you can carry open..concealed with a permit. I know people who do both. I dont get nervous around them ..either way. I am just not easily given to fright. Texas seems to be more restrained than here but I understand that this is a individual state by state option. No problem here. I believe in states rights.
I also understand what you are saying about states like Mass. and others with very restrictive state laws...the constabulary having contempt for the public. I dont approve of this either. If this is civilization ..you can keep it.

Thanks Doc for another great post,
Orangetom


reply posted on 24-5-2006 @ 07:59 AM by dr_strangecraft


Obviously I am pro 2nd Amendment. I am also for responsibility in firerams ownership and usage.
I do not care for being around the shooting range with wildlife who mostly make noise and showmanship. I move to the other end of the range or leave.



[cheney humor]

Serious Hunters don't drink; serious drinkers don't hunt.

[/cheney humor]

There are four people I hunt with; and only one is a family member. And I have a large family . . .


I know this thread is about gun laws, but I just have to mention the "magnum envy" you see among firearms enthusiasts. In my experience, this is due to the fact that most hobbyists don't shoot enough to get really good. So they hope to make up for it with firepower.

For instance, I got a 6 pt. white-tail, using a .243. (unsuccessful) Hunters who saw me were laughing at the "kiddie gun," saying that you need a 7mm or .30-06 to "git a deer."

I suggested that they probably couldn't hit a deer if one was caught in the headlights of their monster truck, and that it doesn't matter what's in your gun if you cannot find the target. You can imagine the response.

Same with upland game. I hunt pheasant with a 12 guage, but I use low brass, and I wing 'em. I hunt for the meat, so I'm always trying to down the bird and have as much good meat as possible. People hunting with extra-grain magnum superloads crack me up. I'd be upset if those types ever actually hit something.

Another bit of this is the factoid that 80% of deer taken in the USA are shot within a one eighth of a mile of a road. I have taken deer on the last day of the season, just by getting out of the truck and *walking* (OMG!) into the woods . . .

I even saw a guy with a "boom box" up in a tree. I've also gotten deer that were fleeing from a party of hunters on ATV's.

Just trying to highlight the fact that its always the nuts & neanderthals that make any human endeaver look "stoopit."

.

[edit on 24-5-2006 by dr_strangecraft]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Nano Drones Flying in Formation
  Posted 12 days ago with 15 member flags
FPS RUSSIA
  Posted 17 days ago with 7 member flags
British nuclear weapons tests, carried out in Australia.
  Posted 0 days ago with 7 member flags
Spinel Thin Transparent Ceramic Armor defeats Barrett .50 Cal BMG
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags
Defective Ammunition Warning
  Posted 5 days ago with 6 member flags
Self-steering Bullet Researched
  Posted 13 days ago with 5 member flags
Shockrounds take out three of your five senses.
  Posted 5 days ago with 5 member flags
Taking the Crowd Out of Firing 155mm Artillery.
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags