It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jakomo
This STARTS with Bush. It moves on to the next President's Administration. And the next, and the next. Once it is a program, it doesn't suddenly stop.
Are you in fact comfortable with the fact that the next Administration (Dem or Republican) will be able to pursue this further? If Hillary is elected, she runs it. Executive Power, baby.
Are you comfortable with the fact that without protesting against it, it leaves the door open to more surveillance?
Are you comfortable with the fact that the US government in 10 years will still have this ability, sanctioned by yourself, and further protected? What will their agenda be? What will their focus be? What will be "troublesome behavior" to them? Who will decide who the "bad guys" are?
You are playing with the privacies of your successive generations, because of a FALSE, TRUMPED UP THREAT!
Because if it's a total mess, the next generation (if they are freedom-loving), will blame YOU and your generation for allowing the government to spy on THEM.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Here's my question. Very simple.
This STARTS with Bush. It moves on to the next President's Administration. And the next, and the next. Once it is a program, it doesn't suddenly stop.
Are you in fact comfortable with the fact that the next Administration (Dem or Republican) will be able to pursue this further? If Hillary is elected, she runs it. Executive Power, baby.
Are you comfortable with the fact that without protesting against it, it leaves the door open to more surveillance?
Are you comfortable with the fact that the US government in 10 years will still have this ability, sanctioned by yourself, and further protected? What will their agenda be? What will their focus be? What will be "troublesome behavior" to them? Who will decide who the "bad guys" are?
This starts with George W. Bush, who knows where it finishes or how robustly it grows.
You are playing with the privacies of your successive generations, because of a FALSE, TRUMPED UP THREAT!
So when you look at what this program has become in 20 years, look back to when it started. And wonder why nobody asked these questions.
Because if it's a total mess, the next generation (if they are freedom-loving), will blame YOU and your generation for allowing the government to spy on THEM.
Edited due to a crazy Boldening (/b)
[edit on 16-5-2006 by Jakomo]
If you think that these NSA-led surveillance activities are new, you are incorrect. If you believe that these operations are aproduct of the evil GWB cabal, you are a fool blinded by your political beliefs. If you think they will end any time soon, I have a lovely bridge for sale that I would like to show you.
Asside from the fact that I have nothing to hide and I had never suspected or had any reason to susect the government would actually spy on me, I would'nt care less if they did because all they would get out of me would be my evening plans with my friends, the latest controversy with my crazy Aunt Polly courtesy of my Mum, or maybe my last order from Dominos.
The "conspiricy" that you are trying to allude to is that the policial powers would use this tool to corrupt the political power process.
Face the facts. You despise our politics, our society, and the current administration. You don't like the way we do things, and look for every opportunity to "expose" our corrupt and morally bankrupt way of life.
Originally posted by Jakomo
ps. I know dozens of Americans, and plenty of ex-Americans living up here now. I have yet to speak to one who agrees with this program at all. I know nobody who supports it whatsoever.
Originally quoted by zenlover28
Again, Ceci tell me how your right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness is being invaded. It's not.
And hey I just don't fear 'terrorism' because of 9-11 alone. We've invaded a Middle Eastern country and that's where my concern in regards to 'terrorism' is. And not to mention the government HAS actually thwarted some terrorist plots. But, no that doesn't exactly make the big media news, now does it?
If you just hate the government then just come out and say it because this trying to turn something into a crime or a violation of your liberties that IS NEITHER isn't cutting it.
Originally posted by pml
Those of us who have worked in positions related to national security understand the necessity of what is done because every day we witness things that make us want to work harder. Now, regarding the compiling of phone records there is one simple fact that must be understood. A list of phone numbers is not a recording of the text of the actual phone call. Has anyone even considered what would be involved in recording all telephone calls given the number of telephones out there and the plethora of folks engaged in mindless conversation? You are safe. If you fear someone will tell your husband or wife about your extracurricular activities you are safe. If you make numerous calls to a terrorist state or organization, you may be monitored. That should be a no-brainer. When I was with NSA during the Cold War we did not have the time, or personnel, to monitor everything; nor did we care to. We did monitor those considered a threat; and always with good reason. I can assure you the NSA is not interested in what you wore to the prom, hearing about your latest conquest, or listening to your complaints about someone who might have said something to someone about you.
So, if you involved in something you want to keep quiet you should consider that before grabbing that cell phone and broadcasting to the world. The same goes for email. If you are afraid of the wrong people reading what you transmit you should not transmit. It seems so simple.
As for me, if the NSA wants to keep a record of my telephone calls or emails so be it. I just hope the folks monitoring what I do have no trouble staying awake.
For the record, I would be against the recording of my actual calls (i.e., the actual content) without a court order.