It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Difference is that Iran wants to wipe out Israel off the map. Its not the same as regime change.
Isreal does have the palenstein issuse....by have they threathen their neighbors? Have the illegally invaded their neighbors?
Originally posted by jajabinks
Not really any difference, the Iranian president has clearly refered to the 'Israeli Regime' as being tyranical and that the political entity of 'Israel' must be wiped off the map and replaced by a different political entity..ie: one that better represents the people of Israel/Palestine.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
And as for ISRAEL rebuffing the attack?.. I dont think so.
I beleive there's a large number of people INSIDE israel, with enough supplies to cause UTTER chaos should a war come.
Wether it be iranians, Iraqi's, palestinians or the boogey man ALQAEDA.
Israel would be hit from the air, from the borders, then from inside.
there only choice would be to FLASH fry other cities, ie Tehran.
and as soon as they nuke tehran, there goes the whole ball game folks.
Why should Israel have nuclear weapons...
But iran cant scientifically evolve there nuclear ABILITY..
it doesnt make sense.
just the same way the iraqi PRE war intellegence and POST WAR lies dont make sense.
Who do you think is pulling the strings?