Originally posted by skippytjc
Islam poses more of a threat to me and my family right this moment than Christans do.
And radical islamists pose far far greater a threat to them than regular old muslims.
Ive said this before, and ill say it again: I know more people killed or affected by Islamic terrorism than any other kind. And until that
changes my opinions won’t change.
But why slam islam, when its islamic terrorism that is the problem? People in england have been killed by catholic terrorists, does that mean that the
RCC is a threat to england?
And right now Islam is not doing so well.
But, again, not everyone who is a pious muslim is a threat, or even part of the problem. I mean, are the catholics in the US that didn't speak out
against the IRA and Republican Movement part of a "Catholic Cabal" to destroy england, to reclaim it for the papacy and undue the Anglican
revolution?
golemina
It's ALMOST ALL involving Islam vs something or another.
?
Like what? The chechans are fighting the russians. Is that because of Islam? If the chechans were shintoists, they wouldnt' be fighting?
The palestinians and israelis, how much of that is
because of Islam, and how much is because of history, with religion used as a justification?
If the Palestinians were all Druze, would it make a difference?
As far as the WOT, thats specifically not against Islam, its against the states, secular, islamist, communist, etc, that support organizations like
al-qaida. Al-qaida is made up of radical, militant, lunatic muslims, NOT moderate muslims.
Other conflicts in the world include war in nepal between communists and hindus. Suicide Bombings in south india perpetrated by Tamil hindus.
Guerilla war between leftists and rightists throughout south america. Wars between christian governments in africa. Etc.
It makes no sense to single out islam, or to try to deal with islamist terrorism by dealing with islam. It'd be like trying to stop the IRA by
somehow dealing with the papacy. It simply wouldn't solve the problem.