posted on May, 10 2006 @ 05:52 PM
When did the rumours (suggesting the moon landings were a fraud) begin? Was it with the movie 'Capricorn One' ?
Movie 'exposes' always make me suspicious. Movies involve an investment of large amounts of money. They require planning, organisation. And I
suspect that anyone (or any movie or tv 'expose') that poses a REAL threat to the ruling elite is eliminated. In other words, no matter how
'controversial' or 'revealing' a movie, book, article or tv show purports to be --- in reality it would never see the light of day UNLESS it
satisfied a government/political agenda. And that includes Michael Moore and all the rest of the so-called 'fearless investigative journalists'.
So would Capricorn One have been permitted to proceed beyond its rudimentary planning stage if it ACTUALLY proposed to tell us something the
government didn't want us to know?
Since then, conspiracy theorists have repeatedly claimed that the US did not land on the moon, to the point its a conspiracy staple, along with UFOs
*IF* the US put a craft and men on the moon, they could --- if they wanted to -- prove it conclusively, once and for all. Have you noticed they
haven't provided such proof? Why? Why instead do they ADD to the conspiracy theories? Why do some of the alleged moon-landing astronauts insist
the landings took place, while others fan speculation by making ambiguous remarks?
Surely by now, none of us is naive enough to believe that ruling elites allow dangers to themselves to continue breathing. We've repeatedly seen
foreign heads of state meet suspicious and improbable deaths. And of course it happens to home-grown politicians etc. so often it barely raises
comment. So we don't really believe that someone as 'unimportant' as an elderly astronaut could spout his mouth off and embarrass the government
and get away with it. Unless that astronaut was really in line with a government agenda.
So, we can probably be confident that the US government wishes conspiracy theories about the moon-landings to continue. And in order they do, minor
government agents probably post in forums just like this, all the time. Why?
Why would the US government encourage people to doubt the veracity of the moon landings? Could it be that they want us to look up at the moon and
believe it's just too remote and difficult for us to reach ? Could it be because they want us to believe that there's no hope of mankind ever
getting off this planet?
Could it be because our own and 'foreign' governments have actually been very busy on the moon for a very long time --- but they don't want the
sheepies to realise that?
It's said (and it's probably correct) that technology is at least 20 years ahead of what is revealed to the sheepies. It's also said that
'puppets' such as world leaders are basically clueless regarding what various organisations within their own governments are up to. Presidents are
basically actors installed by those who *actually* do the controlling and deciding. Presidents come and go fairly rapidly, but black budgets and
shadow organisations exist in the background all the way through. Presidents are the fall-guys. We are the dumb audience who buy the tickets.
Shadowy rulers control mathematical and scientific experts. The mind-controlled and psychopaths run the drugs and war etc. industries which fund the
black budgets. It's all nicely organised and everyone plays along as long as they receive their kick-backs or remain afraid of the threats they're
Could we put men on the moon? Amost certainly, imo. Did we? Most probably, imo. Are we still ferrying men and stuff to the moon? It's to be
strongly suspected, and is to be strongly suspected we have quite a productive little colony up there now, comprising our own and 'foreign'
operatives. Do they want us to know this? Obviously not.