It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Nakash
Fact is, mullahs,priests,or rabbis didn't cause the 40 million dead in the Stalinist era, tens of millions dead on Hitler's hands, 70,000,000 dead on Mao's hand, and so forth. Secular atheistic thought did.
Originally posted by junglejake
I think the point being made was in reference to when you would react with "a bit of venom".
Some religions have as a central element of the faith sharing it with others.
However, that element of those religions makes you mad and you think they should keep it to themselves.
I don't think your wish for religion not to exist in the world is pushing your religious views...
(1) : the service and worship of God or the supernatural
Originally posted by junglejake
Science is not necessarily a religion, but atheism is.
By your own definition of religious belief versus scientific belief, which do you think Atheism falls under? It is an unequivocal declaration that there is no God. What evidence supports this?
Originally posted by gigaplex
Let's not get hung up on this word "religion"...
Originally posted by Astyanax
1.In other words, is there a tacit conspiracy amongst intellectuals to denigrate, debunk and ultimately to destroy religion?
2. Would such an effort to reduce or remove the hold of religion over humanity be a good or bad thing?
You said, "as regards questioning religious people about their beliefs and sort of probing them as a means of getting them to think 'more rationally', I'm totally against that." I'd like to ask you to explain, in some detail if you will, why you're against it.
What if the point of questioning religious folk -- loudly, publicly -- about their beliefs is not getting them to be more rational but to furnish a prophylactic against the spread of their beliefs to others, in particular the young?
Originally posted by gigaplex
If children were not being forced into a belief system before they are old enough to think for themselves how many adults would choose some of these religions? The problem is forcing the beiliefs.
Originally posted by gigaplex
If children were not being forced into a belief system before they are old enough to think for themselves how many adults would choose some of these religions?
"The fundamental cause of trouble in the world today is that the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt." -- Bertrand Russell
Originally posted by Lecter
Don’t even dare group Atheism in the same category as a set of primitive believes as religion. Religion is a primitive belief in the supernatural and in performing rituals like reciting certain (magic ) words to keep the "boogie" man away.
Without religion good men would still do good things and evil men would still do evil things. Only religion can make a good man do evil things.
[edit on 11-5-2006 by Lecter]