Originally posted by smallpeeps
I don't know why, but Masonic Light always chills me out. He's easily my favorite Mason. 
Thanks!
There's a book written by Fritz Springmeyer (yeah him) called "The Watchtower and the Masons" which I have been unable to find.
Naturally, I believe suppression of this book is conspiratorial.
Apparantly, it's only available as an e-book. You can download it
here.
I do know, that this Watchtower religion was started by Masons, has Masonic symbolism and colors everywhere, and a very oppressive, pyramid type
structure.
Due to some of his comments, it is believed by some that Charles Taze Russell was a Mason. However, no Lodge has a record of his membership, and it
does not seem he was ever initiated into the fraternity.
Today, Jehovah's Witnesses are forbidden to become Masons, or to remain Masons. Several years ago, a member of my Lodge became a JW, and resigned
from Masonry because of this.
I mention this so that my motives are known. I don't hate Masons, I hate their secrecy and (my perception of) their contempt for the common
man.
As a "common man" myself, I would argue that Masonry exists
for the common man. From the very beginning, it was composed only of day
laborers. After the fraternity became non-operative, and members of the nobility were admitted, it was still stressed that the king and street-sweeper
were on the same level.
I don't hate the men, I hate the mechanism.
This may come as surprising to some, but I would say the problem is with the
men in Masonry, rather than the Masonic organization. Brother
Stephen DaFoe, webmaster of several Masonic and Knight Templar historical sites, once made the comment that the only problem with Masonry is the
Masons. I agree 100%.
For example, gps777 said something about "Masonry making good men better" being a lie. It's not a lie, but an ideal. Masonry
can make a good
man better, but it can't, in the words of Pike, make a good man out of a born knave.
Some Lodges have become lax in their screening processes. According to the Antient Constitutions, only those of good moral character may be admitted.
Unfortunately, some Lodges admit practically everyone who applies for membership without even the formality of a criminal background check.
Therefore, obviously, the Masonic fraternity is not responsible for the actions of such men, but these men drag all of us through the mud by their
conduct. For example, I'm an American, have never been to England, and have never heard of these two sickos who raped that girl. Yet, because they
were apparently Masons, they make me look bad too, even though I haven't done anything wrong, nor have most Masons. If Lodges would screen their
applicants in the first place like they're supposed to, these kinds of people who belong in cages instead of Lodges would never gain admission.