It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK" - Official report

page: 2
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 8 2006 @ 12:52 AM
link   
Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury,

During the course of this trial you heard that 3 trained soldiers report that they did witness me stab my wife in the middle of Main Street on April the 1 of 2000. This seems like highly convincing evidence.

However, I was not even present on mainstreet on that day. You see, plasma caused a mental hallucination in the mind of these three gentlemen. Their account, including the audio recording made at the time of their observation, merely shows that plasma induces precisely the same hallucination in all 3 soldiers.

Now, I know what you are thinking. You are thinking that this is just some strange theory being thrown out to try and dissuade people from looking at incidents in detial. And I will admit, we can only base the plasma theory on the very strange and disconcerting statements of these so-called eye witnesses.

Therefore, I present, with good authority, a written affidavit signed by a Professional Scientist, name undisclosed for security reasons, who firmly states that it is quite possible that plasma has caused this unusual sight.

Furthermore, I would point out that there is absolutely no evidence that knife stabbing operates outside of natural laws.

Therefore, you must acquit.

Thanks you, ladies and gentlemen of the jury.




posted on May, 8 2006 @ 04:15 AM
link   
Here's another one that's highly suspect:

BRITAIN'S SECRET 'X-FILES' REVEALED
by Dr David Clarke

"Orders were sent to all RAF stations invoking the considerable powers available under the Official Secrets Act to forbid service personnel from discussing UFO sightings with members of the public or the Press. "The public attach more credence to reports by Royal Air Force personnel than to those by members of the public," read the order. "All reports are therefore to be classified confidential and personnel are warned that they are not to communicate to anyone other than official persons any information about phenomena they have observed." The classification of restricted was upgraded to confidential in 1956 and the curtain of secrecy remained firmly in place until the end of the Cold War."



posted on May, 8 2006 @ 05:05 AM
link   

Originally posted by JAK
The BBC has got hold of a previously confidential Ministry of Defence report that took place in the late 1990's ending on 2000.

    UFO study finds no sign of aliens

    A confidential Ministry of Defence report on Unidentified Flying Objects has concluded that there is no proof of alien life forms.

    In spite of the secrecy surrounding the UFO study, it seems citizens of planet Earth have little to worry about.

    The report, which was completed in 2000 and stamped "Secret: UK Eyes Only", has been made public for the first time.

    (Continued at source)


Sheffield Hallam University academic Dr David Clarke got the four year, 400 page report titled "Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK" through the the Freedom of Information Act.



    A MoD spokesperson said: "Both this study and the original "Flying Saucer Working Party" [already in public domain in the national Archives] concluded that there is insufficient evidence to indicate the presence of any genuine unidentified aerial phenomena.

    "It is unlikely that we would carry out any future studies unless such evidence were to emerge."


Jak




They said on TV the report concluded UFOS do exist. They did say it was unexplanable natural phenomana. How can they know it unexplanable natural phenonma if they dont know what it is exactly?



posted on May, 8 2006 @ 05:57 AM
link   
Did anyone else see the segment on BBC Breakfast News this morning, around 7.20AM? It featured a guy from the MOD I think, and a 'UFO Researcher' being interviewed by the two hosts in the studio. Basically the guy from the MOD was explaining away every anomoly we ever see in the skies above the UK as weather. Photos were shown throughout this speech of some pretty good UFO cases (i'd have expected them to show less obvious examples considering the content of the MOD guy's 'explanation' - solid objects with metallic properties don't look like ANY weather phenomena ive ever heard of). The UFO researcher was very shy and didn't exert himself into the conversation much which was a big dissapointment, because the argument ended up very one-sided.

There was a mention of some less easily explainable 'phenomena' showing up on radars, but the general feeling of the whole segment was one of disinformation and bias on the part of the MOD guy. There was an offer to send in pictures on e-mail to the breakfast show, if I didn't have to be at work i'd have sent in some screenshots of the UFOs in the NASA STS missions videos, let them try explain away those objects as 'weather'...

The BBC like to post most of their news segments on their website so i'll have a hunt around when im a bit less busy here at work...see if I can find us a video!



posted on May, 8 2006 @ 06:11 AM
link   
A very good point about the NASA videos, but lets face it, they would 'explain' those away as ice particles or light spots on cameras. It's amazing how an astronaut who is trained in all sorts of science and often sees strange things in space could be fooled by ice particles don't you think?

Don't worry, just accept that anyone who even looks at UFO's critically is insane. I mean these MOD and NASA officials look at it in a pre-decided manner. They can't exist and we shouldn't believe it such a stupid thing either. If these are our intelligence officials then i am seriously worried! The facts are amazing for proving something is flying around up there. Whether it is ours or alien i am still not sure.



posted on May, 8 2006 @ 07:12 AM
link   
It's so obviously disinformation, I mean when have you seen ball lightning/plasma fly in formation. Sure it could explain the "Foo fighters" of world war 2, but not the majority of UFOs, they are normally solid, plasma probably is never a black object.



posted on May, 8 2006 @ 07:36 AM
link   
and what about alien crafts using what they call natural Phenomena ??
if they use a system which uses or creates an effect which lead to something we think to be a natural Phenomena .
plasma is created by extreme heat and a craft which flies fast and goes through our atsmosphere created extreme heat to so plasma can be created underneath or around a craft.
and then we have the russians with there plasma stealth drives.



posted on May, 8 2006 @ 09:01 AM
link   


I find these sudden 'news' events on UFOs in England interesting and certainly different that the BBC website has in two days published two articles on the UFO matter.

Did it distract you from how it's all going
to cac in Basra?



posted on May, 9 2006 @ 01:59 AM
link   
It's all an act of a cover-up, the government chose to take the blue pill (the story ends). However the red pill, I find to be dominant (in my opinion) and I hope the governments wrong decision of ignorance will not be a permanent cause of stopping the extraterrestrials visting here and those who believe.

EDIT: Reply for www.abovetopsecret.com...
(It's Official....no ufo's or aliens......)

[edit on 9-5-2006 by 7Ayreon]



posted on May, 9 2006 @ 02:05 AM
link   
I agree its the British version of Project Blue Book. An effort to debunk and say, well we looked into it. The scarey part about this is the consistent attempt by the British (and USA) to debunk UFOs to the public rather than disclose.



posted on May, 9 2006 @ 06:11 AM
link   
The UK MOD statement is just another disinfo joke. Just like it was with the US final statement. I'm just amazed to see some people swallowing this.

The "Powers-that-be" are just adding another debunking layer. Why ? Maybe because they feel that the cover-up wall is beginning to fissure itself...

[edit on 9/5/2006 by Musclor]



posted on May, 9 2006 @ 12:12 PM
link   
Goverments lie to us about the reason for a war, then the public catches on, then the public believes this MOD report.

How gullible are we? Its like a child being beaten by his daddy. He still believes his daddy has emotional wisdom and trusts his authority.

When are we going to grow up as a public?

[edit on 9-5-2006 by Ectoterrestrial]



posted on May, 9 2006 @ 12:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
Goverments lie to us about the reason for a war, then the public catches on, then the public believes this MOD report.

How gullible are we? Its like a child being beaten by his daddy. He still believes his daddy has emotional wisdom and trusts his authority.

When are we going to grow up as a public?

[edit on 9-5-2006 by Ectoterrestrial]


never?



posted on May, 9 2006 @ 09:10 PM
link   
Stanton Friedman was on the first hour of COAST TO COAST AM WITH GEORGE NOORY Monday 05/08/2006 talking about the UFO study commissioned by the British Ministry of Defence. He did not give it a good review. He also talked about his theories on UFO propulsion.



posted on May, 11 2006 @ 07:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by ferretmaster

Originally posted by Ectoterrestrial
Goverments lie to us about the reason for a war, then the public catches on, then the public believes this MOD report.

How gullible are we? Its like a child being beaten by his daddy. He still believes his daddy has emotional wisdom and trusts his authority.

When are we going to grow up as a public?

[edit on 9-5-2006 by Ectoterrestrial]


never?


Yes I would say never is a fairly good estimate of when people will stop believing the government.



posted on May, 11 2006 @ 11:35 AM
link   
Keep in mind the UK is spy central and Tony Blair. Need I say more?



posted on May, 11 2006 @ 11:39 AM
link   
The Observer
Britain's UFO secrets revealed
Antony Barnett, Public Affairs Editor

Scientist's pressure for information opens up hidden government files on strange sightings in the sky government files:


Dr Ridyard had been seeking information relating to UFO sightings by pilots or radar operators between July 1998 and July 1999. Initially the MoD refused on the ground it would be too expensive. But after the intervention of the ombudsman, Michael Buckley, the MoD agreed to release the information as a one-off exercise for £75. The Ministry handed two reports to Ridyard, yet official information from the Civil Aviation Authority suggests there had been additional sightings. During the same period the CAA said it reported two more UFO sightings to the MoD, neither of which the Ministry disclosed.

According to official CAA reports, in the same month that a radar picked up an enormous object flying across Scotland, a pilot flying over the North Sea became startled when his aircraft became illuminated by an 'incandescent' light. Three other aircraft in the area reported seeing a ball of light moving at high speed. Air traffic controllers reported there were no strange aircraft in the area, but five minutes later an operator at a weather station picked up a fast-moving object..



posted on May, 11 2006 @ 11:58 AM
link   
Anyone see what's wrong with the below quote on Roswell?
The American government kept changing their story. They could have went with the alien hoax because of the Cold War. People would have gave that more credence. But instead Project Mogul and other excuses before that. They never admitted to fabricating an alien hoax. What a bunch of blatant lies.

BRITAIN'S SECRET 'X-FILES' REVEALED by Dr David Clarke



UFO believers have claimed that the cover-up of UFO data was imposed to hide the fact that the American and British Governments possessed hard, conclusive evidence of ET-piloted craft. Some of the more wild rumours suggested the Americans had captured a saucer that crashed in the desert near Roswell, New Mexico, in 1947. The Flying Saucer Working Party report lays that myth to rest. It reveals how British Intelligence was informed by a member of the USAF investigation team that "the…sensational report of the discovery of a crashed 'flying saucer' full of the remains of very small beings, was ultimately admitted by its author to have been a complete fabrication."

If the Americans did recover a crashed UFO at Roswell, then clearly even their closest allies did not have sufficient "need to know." Furthermore, the British shared the American view that 'peaks' in UFO sightings closely followed periods of media publicity "indicating the extent to which sightings may be psychological in origin" or were the product of Cold War fears.

As for the possibility of Extraterrestrial visitors, the study was not optimistic. "When the only material available is a mass of purely subjective evidence," the report concluded, "it is impossible to give anything like scientific proof that the phenomena observed are, or are not, caused by something entirely novel, such as aircraft of extraterrestrial origin, developed by beings unknown to us on lines more advanced than anything we have thought of."[/url]



posted on May, 17 2006 @ 06:35 PM
link   
I'm happy that most of us can see though this B/S immediately as we should but consider this:

If governments can blatantly lie to our faces about serious issues like this and treat us as imbeciles then who are they reporting to and taking orders from then?

I thought the government existed to serve taxpayers and the citizenry. Maybe I am nieve and stupid here...

This makes it painfully obvious that they hold us in contempt and DO NOT LISTEN TO US but to annother power.

Who is that and why?



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join