It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did Paul Mcartney Die And Was He Replaced?

page: 3
10
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 16 2009 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by SkipShipman
 


The Reptilian Agenda? Maybe he was replaced by a shapeshifter! That could answer all 3 questions if you applied David Icke conspiracy theory.
I'll bet he'd find a way to tie The Beatles in, if he hasn't already.




posted on Dec, 17 2009 @ 12:09 AM
link   
hmmm....very interesting, if one was to believe this is true. I don't think the earlobe evidence is enough proof, as we get older our skin sags--take a look at old people's earlobes...they're saggy!

Old people shrink, the piccie of Paul standing next to his dad, well like I said, people shrink with age. My dad was once 6ft 3 in & is now 5ft 8in!! ( he is 70! )

Weight & strength training can make affect people's posture, allowing them to stand up straighter & be taller.

Eye color? Well my eye's were once blue, then went blue/ grey, then bright green, & are now a faded green to hazel color. Who says eyes always stay the same color?


And does anyone think for one second that with the amount of people that would have to be in on this "conspiracy" that one of them hasn't already talked for money? I would!!



posted on Dec, 17 2009 @ 01:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by someotherguy
Link to a photo array showing the obvious anatomical differences in the ears of Paul & Faul


This has all been proved to be BS.

There is a thread on ATS with many pages on this, why do we need another one?

You are Faulcon ain't ya? Or one of her buddies? Why are you guys so adamant about this silly hoax that was put to rest years ago? Why the sudden interest and flooding of ATS with PID threads? You won't convince anyone here that PID.



posted on Dec, 17 2009 @ 01:22 PM
link   
I have seen some crazy stuff but my oh my!

Sir Paul is the same person, it's called getting older and weight gain / loss.

Next we will have the Rolling Stones as the living dead, that is closer to the truth



posted on Dec, 17 2009 @ 02:05 PM
link   
Well if he was replaced, he was replaced by someone with equal or more talent. So I'd say it's a win /win situation for fans. Do people really believe this? I saw Paul a few months ago in Halifax and if he is a Reptilian, then Reptilian's rock! I was lucky enough to see Paul, as his SUV entered the concert site. Myself and 5 other of my family members were right at the front of the artists entrance to the concert when security stopped us and asked us to wait a moment, he wouldn't tell us why but a minute later we saw the police escort coming down the street. I couldn't believe it. Would I be this lucky? Sure enough the vehicles had to slow to make the turn and lo and behold, there was Sir Paul in the back of the SUV with the window on our side rolled down, he was reaching over and waving and saying Hi. It was unreal. I was so close I could have reached in and grabbed hold of him. He looked great in his purple faux Beatles suit. The concert was very professional and awesome but the best part for me was being that close to Paul. Something I will never forget. He played for 3 hours with no break, not bad for a 68 yr old.



posted on Dec, 17 2009 @ 02:18 PM
link   
Not another thread, wasn't the other one like 80 something pages ? The OP says that thread is a different subject. But nope, it's actually exactly the same.

Shut eeerrrrrr down.



posted on Dec, 17 2009 @ 10:02 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpinifexPrincess
hmmm....very interesting, if one was to believe this is true. I don't think the earlobe evidence is enough proof, as we get older our skin sags--take a look at old people's earlobes...they're saggy!

The ears, earlobes, nose, lips, eye color, height, talent, personality, jawline are all different - in 4 months! That's pretty remarkable.


Old people shrink, the piccie of Paul standing next to his dad, well like I said, people shrink with age. My dad was once 6ft 3 in & is now 5ft 8in!! ( he is 70! )

"Paul" grew quite a bit in his mid 20's. Maybe it's a medical miracle? lol


Eye color? Well my eye's were once blue, then went blue/ grey, then bright green, & are now a faded green to hazel color. Who says eyes always stay the same color?

Brown to green? Um, ok.


And does anyone think for one second that with the amount of people that would have to be in on this "conspiracy" that one of them hasn't already talked for money? I would!!

Mal Evans was shot to death one week before he was going to take his tell-all Beatles book to the publisher.

Mal Evans' suspicious death
plasticmacca.blogspot.com...

Heather Mills got a gag order on her.


Shut eeerrrrrr down.

Yes, quick! Shut down discussion before someone figures out Paul McCartney was replaced!



[edit on 17-12-2009 by someotherguy]



posted on Dec, 17 2009 @ 11:13 PM
link   
Howmany duplicate thread do we need.

While it may be interesting, one thread is sufficient. See what happens to other duplicate threads on this site....they get closed and redirected to the original (first) thread on the topic.

It's all ad nauseum reiteration otherwise which turns people even further away from it.

While I am sympathetic to 'the cause' (I find it interesting to entertain) I don't think reiteration helps much at all.



posted on Dec, 17 2009 @ 11:32 PM
link   
reply to post by Omega85
 


I believe that the person that replaced Paul Mcartney hired Mark David Chapman to kill John Lennon because John and Yoko threatened to go public about Pauls death.



posted on Dec, 21 2009 @ 11:49 AM
link   
From the Stewart Swerdlow website today:


Paul McCartney
Posted: December, 21, 2009
I have just been doing some research on Paul McCartney may of died in a car accident in 1966 and was somehow replaced with a double in 1967. He was replaced by a man claiming to be called Bill Sheppard. They say a row broke out between band members and Paul walked out of the studio in a drunken frenzy got in his car and drove very fast he also picked up a women hitchiker. Theirs rumours that the original Paul didnt want to go along with the agenda in promoting the hallucinative drug '___' at the time and the entertainment industry wanted to use The Beatles in promoting it apparentely.

This question has a corresponding link.Click here
Stewart's Reply: True, I wrote about this a while ago. It is a very old story, but one that appears to be correct.

expansions.com...


And a new Paul is Dead Rotten Apple video from Iamaphoney at www.youtube.com...



posted on Dec, 22 2009 @ 02:35 AM
link   
While everything else can be explained, in my opinion, I have decided that I have doubts about the eyes going from brown to green. I really can't see this one happening at all, even thou my eyes were blue & over the years are not nearly hazel.

In my quest for answers on this ( which I only actually discovered was more than the "paul is dead" hype I heard years ago, & thought nothing more of it ) , I actually discovered some dude who reckons..............now wait for it............



that Stephen King killed John Lennon!!!






And to the people who are complaining about this topic, well, you don't have to be here. If the subject isn't interesting, then, nothing to see here.....move along!!



posted on Dec, 22 2009 @ 02:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Omega85
 


Long time Bass Player chiming in here -

the guy playing on "let it be" was the same guy playing on "love me do"

The touch and the style gives it away...

there are many indications in the song writing also

oh and singing

sorry



posted on Dec, 22 2009 @ 01:23 PM
link   
reply to post by SpinifexPrincess
 


You need to do some research, it's very common for Hazel eyes to look Green. And remember you are looking a copies of photographs (not the originals), it would be very doubtful that the colours are true in those original let alone the copies. The light, the camera, the film used, the processing can all change the colours and shades in a photograph. So don't expect 2 different pics of Macca to show the exact same colour. Focal length will change the perspective of the head also making pic comparisons, from different sources, not an exact science.


A large percentage of hazel eyes have a brown ring around the iris, and either green or blue coloring around the outside of the ring. In the image to the right, you can see the darker inner ring surrounded by a lighter outer ring. To learn more about the subject, read about how genetics affect eye color...How and why eye color changes. Pigment in the front layer of the iris (called the stroma) colors the iris. Eye color lightens when pigment granules drop in number, or when the granules make a lighter color. See figure. The iris can also lose color if the pigment degrades.

Eyes, unlike skin and hair, do not synthesize color pigment continuously. Instead, eyes keep pigment granules made earlier. So, if the pigment degrades, the eye color lightens.

Likewise, eyes can darken if the number of pigment granules increase or if the granules make darker pigment.

That’s how the color changes. Why does it change? Genetics is the key as experimenters learned by studying twins. They observed the eyes and skin of identical twins and non-identical twins of American Caucasians between the ages of 3 months to 6 years.

Both sets of twins showed a "darkening with age of both the hair and eye colour," says Sturm. The identical twins changed color together, at essentially the same rate. The non-identical twins changed color but at different rates, which indicates a "strong genetic influence in the timing of these colour changes."

Eye color probably changes for the same reason we have one head instead of two: genes. Genes determine all body characteristics — including changing eye color as we age.

Further Reading:

Eye color mocks easy rules, WonderQuest


www.wonderquest.com...

Can we please end this ignorant BS now?



posted on Dec, 22 2009 @ 03:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by ANOK

Can we please end this ignorant BS now?


...if that happened there would be no more ATS!



posted on Dec, 22 2009 @ 03:26 PM
link   
reply to post by aorAki
 


Hehe well I wouldn't go quite that far, but it would make a huge difference to it's thread count.

But less can be more...



posted on Dec, 22 2009 @ 07:27 PM
link   
New IAAP Paul is Dead video.



Information about the song, "Peace of Mind":


"Peace of Mind" (also known as "The Candle Burns") is the name given to a song of unknown origin that was attributed to The Beatles on bootleg albums starting in 1973. The recording has the sound quality of a home-produced demo, and was reportedly recovered from a trash container at Apple Corps headquarters in 1970...

Lyrics

I'm looking at the candle, burns a flame to meet the sky.
I leave the candle laughing, I turn my face to cry.
A safety pin returns my smile, I nod a brief hello,
while you are building molecules with your garden hoe.

Why can't this last forever—these things repressed inside?
One feels it almost instantly, unless one of us died.
It's over, it's done, babe I need it again.
Just please, please, please, oh, don't keep me from begin.

I need to hear the colors red and blue and whispered word.
To fly all day and sing in tune and not hear what I'd heard.
To see you all around me and to take you by the hand,
and lead you to a brand new world that lately has been banned.

We'll build things never built before, we'll do things never done.
And just before it's over, it's really just begun.
(Hush)

en.wikipedia.org...



[edit on 22-12-2009 by someotherguy]



posted on Dec, 22 2009 @ 08:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Omega85
In the late sixites there was a rumour that...Paul Mccartney was actually killed in a car crash


Oh, yes, I remember the rumor well, as well as the backward recordings that said Paul was dead, etc...

However, you might have to be a staunch Beatles fan to know for certain that it was a complete hoax. See, Sir Paul's musical and lyrical influence on The Beatles was more than trifling — as far as most Beatle's fans are concerned (and this includes myself), Paul McCartney WAS The Beatles.

I know, I know, the John Lennon contingent out there is groaning, but even they can't ignore the fact that Paul was the consummate musician and the consummate poet of the group. John's music and lyrics were spacey, and that's being kind. Paul could run rings around John for music and lyric composition.

Therefore, if Sir Paul died in the late 60s, NOBODY could have continued his musical and lyrical legacy — The Beatles would have died, also, on the spot.

But Paul continued, well after The Beatles disbanded, to blow us away with his musical genius — Here is a man considered the most successful musician/singer/songwriter in history, with a long-running string of Gold & Plantinum singles and albums over 5 decades, the great majority of which he composed after leaving The Beatles.

So... If Paul McCartney died in the late 1960s, they would have had to replace him with another unknown musical genius, who was able to not only exactly replicate Paul McCartney's style for The Beatles, but who continued to develop and embellish Paul McCartney's style for 40 years thereafter.

Tell me, if another such musical genius existed in the 1960s, where are his works prior to joining The Beatles?



Well, obviously, there was and is only one Paul McCartney. Ya can't replicate him and ya certainly can't replace him.

Besides all that, anybody who wanted to replace Paul McCartney in life would have to, necessarily, be one of the foremost fans and experts on Buddy Holly, McCartney's personal idol. McCartney credits Buddy Holly's music and career with inspiring him to greatness — he's been gushing about Buddy Holly his entire professional life, since before The Beatles and right up to the present.

There is no greater fan and expert of Buddy Holly than Paul McCartney, except perhaps the rock historian Bill Griggs.

— Doc Velocity



posted on Dec, 23 2009 @ 12:14 AM
link   
reply to post by ANOK
 


Thanx ANOK for that in-depth description about eye colors & genetics, I'm stil looking thou, I need more proof.

I personally can't see how "they" could have "made" the Fake Paul McCartney in the same image ( eg- genius ), because this implies that the Beatles were "concocted" by "someone" & the whole band is fake!

But still, the eye color is intriguing & I'm still digging......


A DNA test would sort this out once & for all, with Paul & his siblings taking the test, would be proof positive & then we'd all have to shut the hell up, hey?!!

Meanwhile, this still persists................




posted on Dec, 23 2009 @ 01:16 PM
link   
reply to post by SpinifexPrincess
 


Why is it when I present proof over and over again about eye colour changing people still refuse to believe it?

Maybe when you all grow up and your own eye colour changes (mine went from very dark green almost grey looking to a bright green), you will believe.

Or just do a Google search.

Here another explanation...


Eye color also can change with age. This happens in 10 to 15 percent of the Caucasian population (people who generally have lighter eye colors). For instance, my once very brown eyes are now hazel, a combination of brown and green. However, some hazel eyes actually get darker with age.

www.allaboutvision.com...

Paul had HAZEL eyes, a combination of BROWN and GREEN, the GREEN part of his eyes became more dominant as he got older. Or the camera, lighting, film used emphasized green over brown. Both are exceptable logical explanations, the alternative includes fooling thousands of people, including friends and relatives. Which do you think makes more sense?

[edit on 12/23/2009 by ANOK]



posted on Jan, 1 2010 @ 10:50 AM
link   
If you don't already realize that James Paul McCartney was killed and replaced, then I humbly advise to remove the rose colored glasses and unplug the wax balls from the ears.


Only for those who have awakened, there is a thread dedicated to investigating his murder.


Those who are either hired shills denying the imposture, or bored couch potatoes seeking meaning in an empty existence by defending lies, should abstain.


Right here at ATS, dumped from the lowly Skunk Works forum to the Below Top Secret "People" section:


PID - Motivations for the Murder of Paul McCartney


Pay no attention to the usual slew of paid and unpaid disinformation mavens who pollute such threads with disclaimers and personal attacks. They are a cry in the wind, and fall to the wayside by their own infamous acts. Don't reply to their hate conjecture and just place them on your IGNORE list if they annoy you. With any luck your own thread here won't be "dislodged" from this forum for being politically incorrect.


Looking forward to your positive and constructive participation in our criminal investigation into the murder of James Paul McCartney in 1966. Those impeding this inquest are making themselves accomplices to the crime.



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join