What a controlled demolition really looks like., page 1

Originally posted by Jack Tripper

Originally posted by Stateofgrace
I don't know, maybe the dreadful last moments of this guys live will expalin it all.

www.flurl.com...

Guess those explosives really were silent after all I never heard them as this poor individual went though what none of us will ever have to face,hopefully.

Wow! Insane cllip.

Did you catch what he told the operator?

"My wife thinks I'm alright. I called and said I was leaving the building and then ---BANG!"

So he did hear an explosion.

There were MANY MANY corroborated accounts of bombs going off BEFORE the collapse as was testified by William Rodriguez to the 9/11 commission.

Kevin Cosgrove is yet another corroboration of explosions.

He was talking about the plane crashing into the building.

And now you are saying that the explosions that were heard actually went off before the planes hit?

So as well as using Thermite (the silent type) they also use tradition explosive charges before the planes hit. But that doesn't make sense at all.

If explosives were used before the planes hit (the conventional type) then what would have happened had the planes not hit?

So it all boils down to using explosive charges prior to the planes hitting, the actual damage caused by the planes and then using thermite after the planes hit. Seems mighty elaborate to me.

Sorry for being so stupid but maybe you could talk me through the precise sequence of events because from what I have read, this is now how you see it.

Step 1. Explosive charges go off prior to the planes hitting.
Step 2. The planes hit.
Step 3 Thermite are used to complete the job.

If this was the case then the demolition experts must have been very confident that their tracks would have been covered by the planes hitting the Towers and that the buildings would not have collapsed prior to the Planes hitting. Also they must have been extremely confident that the Towers which, by your implications were already dangerously unstable prior to the planes hitting did not collapse as soon as the planes hit.

Secondly, the planes hitting the towers and the fire did help to bring the buildings down. Most conspiracy theorists believe
that the planes and the subsequent fires did help bring down the towers. But in a controlled demo as in the video where
is the planes and fires?

So if the planes did not help to bring down the towers then step two is now invalid?
And the Towers were simply brought down by using a combination of conventional explosives that was not captured on camera at all, as they went of prior to the planes hitting and then the silent thermite type explosions.

But wait that doesn't make sense neither, because many people point out the squibs coming from the Towers as they went down, surely this must have been caused by conventional explosive charges and not the slow burn thermite?

Also why would the Towers start to collapse precisely at the point of impact, rather than the basement? How would termite survive such a massive plane crash?
And why if they were so well prepared for this demolition did they not collapse into their own footprint?

It's all very confusing maybe somebody could clear it up.

[edit: fixed BBcode for code]

[edit on 5/5/2006 by 12m8keall2c]