How would the US fare in the next world war?, page 19
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19    20    21    22  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times


reply posted on 4-7-2006 @ 02:42 PM by urmomma158
Oh and the iraqi insurgents don't prefer to attack civilians rather then the army there, is that another "FACT" of yours though? If it is perhaps I should take it seriously then? The insurgents there carry out strikes against the US. With al their gear it's only smart not to go in a hed on ingagement with US forces. By the way, the US isn't exactly famouse for it's ability to fight guerilla warfare. Vietnam; 50,000 casualties in 20 years. Afgan (vs russia); 20,000 dead in 15 years. Oh and there is no current arab army in iraq you jack a*s.
Well vietnam guerillás we're supported by the north,had millions of soldiers, and we're well trained and we're well equipped. Russia on the other hand couldn't even handle the afghan warlords when they outgunned and outnumbered them.Besides past assertions only go so far. You couldn't even handle chechnya which was recent while we toook on the 5th largest army which was semi well equipped and beat them with ease twice.

Yhea, taiwan has forces and so does south korea, what's your point? You think that would be enough to help you against china? lol. true, Japan can help, until the russian fleet attacks.
We all know how crappy China's power projection is. Russia and China aren't the best of friends you know,they wouldn't necessarily fight on the same side.

Canada on your side is a tremendouse resource? LMAO! nice one!.
They do have a nice amount of natural resources

You finally said something right mate, you are an idiot, and a big one too. Support your statements with examples for godsake and maybe someone ill listen to you. I'm done arguing with you. It's pointless cause I can see you don't know jack and squat about militaries, past war histories, and can't make any logical statements above those of a 13 year old. I gave you examples of just china and russia, I didn't even metnion the rest of the world. Have fun madman I'm off this thread.
Why don't you make some logical arguments. Based on your posts i can tell you don't think before you speak.You seem to not know jack about war for that matter spets. Why don't you lay off the immature dissing and grow up.Based on what you we're saying you don't know anything about military alliances either.

en.wikipedia.org...



[edit on 4-7-2006 by urmomma158]

[edit on 4-7-2006 by urmomma158]


reply posted on 5-7-2006 @ 02:11 AM by Simon666
Originally posted by urmomma158
Russia on the other hand couldn't even handle the afghan warlords when they outgunned and outnumbered them.Besides past assertions only go so far. You couldn't even handle chechnya which was recent while we toook on the 5th largest army which was semi well equipped and beat them with ease twice.

The 5th largest army is a grandiose overstatement, it was the fourth largest army in 1990 before the Gulf War and the
15th largest by 1994. The Soviets took Afghanistan, or controlled at least its capital, within three to four days after the invasion started. 80% of the countryside however still escaped its control. The Soviets suffered about 15,000 casualties in 10 years, or 1500 a year. One could argue that with a country of similar size of Iraq and of less population at the time and without modern combat armor and medical facilities, that's about comparable as to how "easily" the US is beating the resistance. Given enough time, one or two decades, you WILL withdraw or continue with around 10,000 casualties and STILL being nowhere.

[edit on 5-7-2006 by Simon666]


reply posted on 8-7-2006 @ 07:05 PM by underground12
The problem is probably that the US army is not a power any country whants to chalange openly , but wat happens if a country or serveral country's deside to not openly attack the US country soil - lest say a group of country's are able to infiltrate a great number of para trained militarie - or terrorist on US soil , lest say 5000 poeple in around 10 years - get them well armd , with explosifs , small arms , and wapons of mass destrucktion no need for them to be of any nuclear type , they could blow up buildings , tunnels , railroads , bridges , oil rafineries , power stations , police stations , imagine a big country like the us in the dark for weeks without power or Gass , large fires , - no need to have more then a few hunderd terrorists on country soil to get a large part of the amerikan poeple to fight against eatch other , Amerika is a country of many colors and cultures , a global blackout is all whats needed to have a large quantety of poeple in complete panic - you whould have a real war on eatch street whitout having one terorist shooting sombody , as panic spreads there work even gets easyer , how do you whant to identify them ? Sombody knows how many illegal imigrants are in the US ?
A great planner could destroy the US from the inside whitout any problem this is the real treat and its verry hard to secure against it whitout going to a Comunist law system where the governement is over powerfull and no human wrights exsist .
The over powerfull US army whould have no Country to attack - only assumptions how to react on these kind of attacks ?


reply posted on 8-7-2006 @ 07:14 PM by RetinoidReceptor
Originally posted by underground12
The problem is probably that the US army is not a power any country whants to chalange openly , but wat happens if a country or serveral country's deside to not openly attack the US country soil - lest say a group of country's are able to infiltrate a great number of para trained militarie - or terrorist on US soil , lest say 5000 poeple in around 10 years - get them well armd , with explosifs , small arms , and wapons of mass destrucktion no need for them to be of any nuclear type , they could blow up buildings , tunnels , railroads , bridges , oil rafineries , power stations , police stations , imagine a big country like the us in the dark for weeks without power or Gass , large fires , - no need to have more then a few hunderd terrorists on country soil to get a large part of the amerikan poeple to fight against eatch other , Amerika is a country of many colors and cultures , a global blackout is all whats needed to have a large quantety of poeple in complete panic - you whould have a real war on eatch street whitout having one terorist shooting sombody , as panic spreads there work even gets easyer , how do you whant to identify them ? Sombody knows how many illegal imigrants are in the US ?
A great planner could destroy the US from the inside whitout any problem this is the real treat and its verry hard to secure against it whitout going to a Comunist law system where the governement is over powerfull and no human wrights exsist .
The over powerfull US army whould have no Country to attack - only assumptions how to react on these kind of attacks ?


You have to understand. There are millions and millions of guns in civilian possession in the US. I myself have 3. If a few thousand of people started to make trouble, the American people would rip them a part. We aren't known to be the most tolerant people hehe.

[edit on 8-7-2006 by RetinoidReceptor]



reply posted on 9-7-2006 @ 10:48 AM by INc2006
lol, anyway i mean he's right, i'm not american, the American people will unite in case of a major invasion of the american mainland, but who know what could happen if it's just terrorists trying to build up the pressure, then they blow it up by cutting all communications and power, it can be disastrous, and think about this, if the US power grids go off, a chain reaction happens, and bam Mexico and Canada lie without pr, then it might spread even farther to south america, the American Power grid is very large and it shutting off can cause such a chain reaction and who know both the Americas(south and North america) could lie in the dark. then the world would really ahve trouble. but anyway, if Washington remains intact, the whole country can stabilize, but if something happens to the chain of command and washington, and no government exists no more, then there would be a whole lotta troubl, the country could easily go into civil war if some major cities such as New York, Washington, etc, get bombed with WMO's, hehe, then you really got it going. then the south west and California can split, Calfornia itself can be a country with great economic power, the midwest and the northwest, can split from the union, and there you go the bread basket is now it's own country, then you can easily have Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, etc, split up and there goes your oil, the south east, Florida, etc, can split and there goes some really big money outta of the union. and if the Northeast doesn't stablize quickly and rally the army to help, i'm sure the European union or any power that is able to say that it's trying to stabilize the area or to bring peace and calm back would take the opportunity and land itself up there and try to possess it's own share of the US. but still i don't think the US could blow up like that, no not that easy, and not again.


reply posted on 9-7-2006 @ 12:50 PM by Where2Hide2006
First of All let me say that I love America. I understand what we are doing in the ME and I support it...although i wish their goals could have been achieved in a more covert fasion, however after 9-11, I am sure the American Empire (afterall that is what historians will one day call it) after 9-11 I am sure they felt the need to show their power projection to the world. Afterall the AE is decades ahead of the rest of the world in military technology and power projection. By the Way I voted for Bush in 2000 and 2004...but i live in a Blue state so my votes didn't count. I however Do not support the manner in which this war against Iraq has been conducted.

With ALL of that Being Said... now I hope you understand a little more about me...

AMERICA Has NO CHANCE in WWIII


Its not because America is outnumbered...or because its military is currently overstretched...and its not because America has lost most of its allies to weakness.
Not because a EMP blast would cripple the entire country, or even because an Economic Attack would force another great depression.


The REASON Why America stands no chance in WWIII is because of the way WARS will be fought in the 21st Century.


SCALAR TECHNOLOGY


America lays Vulnerable at 3 major points..

1. San Andreas Fault .... could destroy from San Diego, California to Seattle,Washington.

2. The New Madrid Fault... would destroy St.Louis, Memphis, upto Chicago

3. Yellowstone Super Caldera... Would utterly destroy Central USA...cutting off the East from the West Coast...and Causing a Year or More of Total Darkness and Massive Crop Failures...however...would cure the global warming problem.


America Has Had TESLA's Notebooks for a HUNDRED YEARS... I would suspect that many of the Black Projects were involving his technology...Also HAARP.
Also Tesla came up with a diffent kind of missile defense...an electro magetic shield. He was quite litterally hundreds of years ahead of his time.
Pages: <<  16    17    18    19    20    21    22  >>    ^^TOP^^



Colt Commander, finally failed
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Laser Firearms
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags
US Army Launches Phase II of competition to replace M4
  Posted 16 days ago with 3 member flags
America\'s Next Bomber: Unmanned, Unlimited Range, Aimed At China
  Posted 17 days ago with 3 member flags