It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

this just in you are going to die

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 4 2006 @ 02:58 AM
link   
I decided to write this to kinda share my frustrations with you all. I read all of your threads and post on a some and while people should always keep there eyes open there is a line that can bee plainly seen between questioning and being psyco. The use of commonsense and some basic research seems to be lacking in this set of threads.

Lets get to the topic there is a side effect of life it is called death so get used to it. Most would sell there soul to live on this planet for a lengthened amount of time. While I am in no way a fan of death there is a line that when people say death there mind shuts off and they become drones. A easy example is asbestoses. It was first identified as a carcinogen by the Nazis and later confirmed by workers done by the US government. The studeys done with it was before they knew smoking was bad so lots of those studied for lung cancer smoked. So they replaced it with fiberglass wow SMART. Every one is led to think that it is better but you replaced a naturally dissolving substance when in contact with lungs to glass shreds that just collect in people’s lungs. So every person that has not had geology or a advanced chem. class still believes this.

Now to a fluorine thread I had read a while ago while it has been added to water for hazy reasons most don’t know or do research that people that have wells drink 3 times more then those in the city. This lack of research and good scientific method is cluttering up this forum. The motto is to deny ignorance but that rarely happens instead more bad reasoning goes in to it and it just goes downhill. If we where to embrace this motto it would be that everyone would have to keep an open mind about topics. I think I could fit a tank through the eye of a needle then to have most people do just that. lol im not saying that either of these is wrong or right just that people don’t use the proper method and let there emotions and personal biases influence there posts.

Cooking food causes carcinogens to be released. Eating to many bananas will give you radiation poisoning. The lining of popcorn bags is bad. The cheese in Doritos is bad. Sunlight is bad. Water is bad. Salt is bad. We are only here for a limited amount of time and there is a balance of what is bad and what is necessary. While something we know are bad like cooked food …I don’t know about most people but eating what is only good for me I would rather die. Having a Big Mac or sunning while having a salty pretzel is alright as long as you have a healthy lifestyle and eating healthy. All things should be in moderation balance health and pleasure taste with nutrition. A balance is what is needed in all things.




posted on May, 4 2006 @ 03:54 AM
link   


The lining of popcorn bags is bad.


Not all things are bad. Everything is good in moderation. EAT IT!!!



posted on May, 4 2006 @ 07:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by engenerQ
This lack of research and good scientific method is cluttering up this forum. The motto is to deny ignorance but that rarely happens instead more bad reasoning goes in to it and it just goes downhill. If we where to embrace this motto it would be that everyone would have to keep an open mind about topics. A balance is what is needed in all things.



Sometimes your opinion of "bad reasoning" might not be the same as another's. I realize that many people do fail to back up things they say with lots of scientific research these days; but in many cases it's because this is a conspiracy site, and sometimes there is a certain "lack of evidence". Many people come here to throw their ideas about conspiracies out, and may have no sources to quote. I don't see it as a HUGE problem in most cases, but yes I see your point regarding research of particular scientific phenomena.


Dae

posted on May, 4 2006 @ 07:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by engenerQ
All things should be in moderation balance health and pleasure taste with nutrition. A balance is what is needed in all things.


Balance Healthy Lifestyle ™ (BHL). Woot! I know what you are saying and it makes 'common sense' but is it right? Do you think if we had this balance and control we will live till old age (whatever that is)? I dont think so, not under our current system. Maybe if we took away most of the toxins, in and out of our homes, we could stand a chance. As is, telling people that a BHL should get you to old age in a decent state is way out there. Mind you ya didnt say that, you said BHL is the way to go and then ya die.

OK, what am I getting at. I believe we live in a blame culture, everybody is blaming us. Us the people born into a legacy of pollution and plunderisim... sorry capitalism. We are dying at a rate of knots? Will cancer be known as normal death? My nan died at the age of 99 last year, she died of old age, nowt wrong with her illness wise. How rare will that be? 1 in 2 men and 1 in 3 women die of cancer, so Ive read. Will we see that as normal?

Son: What happens when we die mama?
Mama: Well, one day you will get cancer and that is nature letting you know its your time to go to that better place...

Blet, sounds horrific to me.

I want to direct you to a very telling article on the BBC news website.

'I was fit, but still had heart attack'

He did not smoke, drank little and led a healthy lifestyle - even using meditation to decrease stress, something considered a factor in heart attacks.

But just before Christmas he experienced chest pains while sitting at his desk at work.

Worried because he had been suffering pains the night before as well, he rang his doctor who had been treating him for high blood pressure over the previous nine months.


Did you notice that he had been on high blood pressure treatment for the past 9 months? He was also given an emergency angioplasty instead of the clot busting (thrombolysis) drugs.

From the same article:

They compared the results of 137 patients who had emergency angioplasties and 137 who had clot busting (thrombolysis) drugs.

They found that, while 97% of the patients who had the procedure survived, this was reduced to 88% of the thrombolysis patients.


Now, maybe Im just a conspiracy nut but something isnt right here, the Drugs are either not working as well as sticking a tube with a baloon into your heart or they are outright harming people. Such a significat number of people will die while using the clot busting drug as opposed to an invasive procedure - in my mind, that is not progession. If angioplasties are giving people an excellent chance of survival and hospital recovery time is SHORTER than those treated with the drugs...

But you say we all die anyway...



posted on May, 4 2006 @ 07:47 AM
link   
^ ^ ^ ^
l l l l

What they all said.....................................Well balanced Diet and Smarts.


i Only think humans should be on this earth till we cant do things for ourselves, age 80? but still i know 80 year olds who can out run me, (25) now honestly people who prolong their life are just making it harder on themselves, theres a naturaly working system an when u dont follow it you screw yer flow all up....



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join