It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The US government is conducting research into building a ground-based laser weapon that could destroy enemy satellites in orbit.
The secret project, which according to the Times was partially made public through Air Force budget documents submitted to Congress in February, would use beams of concentrated light to destroy enemy satellites in orbit.
The weapon is part of a wide-ranging effort to develop defensive and offensive space weapons, the New York Times said Wednesday, citing federal officials who spoke on condition of anonymity.
The weapon would use sensors, computers and flexible mirrors to counteract the atmospheric turbulence.
High energy laser pointing and tracking technology was pioneered by Hughes. In June 1996, the SEA LITE Beam Director, originally developed by Hughes for the U.S. Navy, successfully illuminated and actively tracked a ballistic missile in its boost phase - marking another historic "first" and step forward toward a high energy laser system for ballistic missile defense. During the experiment conducted at White Sands Missile Range by the U.S. Air Force Phillips Laboratory, SEA LITE, which is the world's most advanced high energy laser beam control system, incorporated a low-power pulsed laser to demonstrate this capability.
In February 1996, SEA LITE scored the first ever shoot-down of a short-range rocket by a laser beam. This event was part of the Nautilus technology demonstration program being conducted by the U.S. Army and the Israel Ministry of Defense. Hughes laser pointing and tracking systems have demonstrated in earlier programs the capability to acquire and track supersonic missiles, and then disable them with a focused beam of intense laser energy.
Hughes' legacy in pointing and tracking technology began 27 years ago with the design and development of the ground-based Field Test Telescope. Other successful ground-based and airborne system demonstrations included the Navy Pointer Tracker and the Airborne Pointer Tracker/Airborne Laser Laboratory, which was mounted in a modified KC-135 aircraft.
Originally posted by zerotolerance
"U.S. Government seeks a powerful laser weapon to destroy enemy satellites"
Yay!
Originally posted by Enkidu
Didn't Ronald Reagan spend about a zillion dollars in black project money during the 1980's to try to come up with something like this, driving the country into a huge deficit and screwing up the economy for a decade, and nobody was able to figure out how to hold it together?
That's what I remember.
Originally posted by deltaboy
Why is America's economy yet not collapse?
Originally posted by Enkidu
More to the point, though, wasn't it determined that all the money spent on Star Wars was pointless when all anybody had to do was drive and old pickup truck across the border with a nuke in the back? Or fly a couple of commercial jets into some tall buildings?
Just who are these "enemies" we're protecting ourselves from? The Koreans? The Chinese? The Mexicans, with their new space program?
Originally posted by SwitchbladeNGC
you don't need lazers to do that.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by SwitchbladeNGC
you don't need lazers to do that.
Hmm... perhaps you do, what kind of energy did those dish’s fire? If it was electrical then that can be shielded against. However shielding a satellite from a megawatt class laser is a different story. And the only thing limiting the range and power of current military lasers is the size of the power plant, seeing as how these systems are ground based that shouldn’t be a problem.
Originally posted by SwitchbladeNGC
It would have been EMP. Though shielding an entire satelite from EMP makes it worthless because none of it's sensors would be able to pick anything up.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Originally posted by SwitchbladeNGC
It would have been EMP. Though shielding an entire satelite from EMP makes it worthless because none of it's sensors would be able to pick anything up.
Not really, you could shield the critical components along with the circuits, which are stored internally. Sure its not fool proof but it should be more resistant to EMP than a regular satellite. And I’m curious as to how they managed to direct an EMP into a beam as it usually radiates outward in all directions.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Or… you could install an off the shelf surge suppressor to connect the wires and other links form the sensors to the circuits. Now that’s just from the civilian market, and they’re good even against lightning strikes.
Originally posted by SwitchbladeNGC
Except that they work by blowing a fuse or tripping a breaker, which have to be reset (manually as far as I am aware).