It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Christian IX
HAHA! NONE of you who think Iran can be invaded, know anything about strategy!
I just like to take people down and make them feel like idiots.
Originally posted by Christian IX
You KNOW the Iranians are working on a nuke? HOW GULLIBLE ARE YOU?
I say GET RID OF AMERICA, and we will have out international security!!
Of course they brainwash/drug their agents before making them blow themselves up, but mostly it is not done in this way.
The U.S.A. even drug their soldiers to prevent them from deserting in FEAR.
Here we go with the accusations again! Name ONE act of terror that has been done by the state of Iran and the Iranian government, in the name of Iran!
Now mention FIVE that have NOT been committed by the USA or its allies!
Why are you picking on Vitchilo? You didn't have anything better to say? Did his words make you choke on your pigburger??
Originally posted by Nygdan
I expect that the war, the convetinal aspect, will be brutal, dangerous, and tough, BUT also quick and a decisive victory for the US, with the Iranian armour, army, air, etc, completely destroyed.
Its sounds strange to say that, but such is the modern world. Quick wars, that are very tough.
The United States said Tuesday it is seeking a binding U.N. Security Council resolution demanding that Iran halt uranium enrichment. But it is not, at least in its initial push in the United Nations, asking for sanctions.
Originally posted by Toadmund
Just read this:
The United States said Tuesday it is seeking a binding U.N. Security Council resolution demanding that Iran halt uranium enrichment. But it is not, at least in its initial push in the United Nations, asking for sanctions.
from:
www.voanews.com...
Hmmm, wonder why they are not pushing for sanctions yet, Hmmm.
Could it be that the world knows that sanctions make you vulnerable and Iran will not go for that without a fuss? That they will not allow themselves to be weakened, only to be subsequently invaded?
Memories of Iraq.
sanctions = occupation
And Heckman, how do you suppose the world came to think this way, because they hate your freedoms?
Originally posted by Toadmund
How can the US be viewed as the tolerant ones, when they are doing all the threatening and pushing? Iran's are counter threat's made after the US ones.
History shows that the Bush regime is not tolerant and wants to invade wether the world approves or not
but this time IMO it's 80% pulling a bluff.
This is another war that does not have to happen, if Iran was left alone, I am sure they would not be a threat to anybody
lol
Despite Isreal not doing anything to Iran...
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called for the Jewish state to be "wiped off the map".
And Heckman, how do you suppose the world came to think this way, because they hate your freedoms?
Mostly they hate Isreal and our support for them.
This is all a bunch of talk anyway. I seriously doubt Iran would be stupid enough to attack Isreal. It would be suicide for them as they would erode any support they may have had with the international community and they'd have to deal with the overwhelming response that would be sure to follow.
Man, get the racist and/or hate wording out of this, this happened before in another post where someone pulled the race/hate card.
It's not the people of a country that is hated, it's those who control our lives.
Originally posted by ThatsJustWeird
lol
Security council and Germany - Don't make nukes. Abide by international law. Sanctions may be put in place if you don't.
Iran's response - We'll attack Isreal!
When we invaded Afghanistan there was close to 100% worldwide support
In Iraq it dropped a bit there there was still widespread
What other countries are you talking about?