Originally posted by AgentSmith
Not really, I showed before that if you compare various crashes from an air disaster database with the FAA records you often have aircraft continuing
for long periods of time as 'active', like all massive databases it's pretty useless.
The problem is that people are quick to make such assumptions and statements without actually checking to see if the same anomolies can be observed in
relation to 'ordinary' incidents. It's a fine example of the lack of research in putting together 9/11 conspiracy evidence, one of the first things
you are taught at school when conducting experiments is to have a 'control' yet this does not seem to happen. The majority of the time if someone
does bother to do this they'll notice that the data they think of as evidence is too inaccurate to be conclusive.
[edit on 7-5-2006 by AgentSmith]
For your information i am a former Air Force Crew Chief and i now work for NSA, Office of Weapons and Space as an analyis and know how to research
aircraft. I have researched this and found out things like Flight 77 records were updated with the correct information when dregistered, like reason
for cancellation was destroyed. Flight 99 record was left active for 4 years and then the reason for cancellation is just cancelled.
Also the dates for cancellation can be due to the reason for deregistration.
Source:
registry.faa.gov...
Deregistered Aircraft:
An aircraft that has been removed from the U.S. Civil Aircraft Register at the owner's request. Aircraft are generally removed for the following
reasons: exported, destroyed, salvaged, dismantled, or permanently retired from service
[edit on 14-5-2006 by ULTIMA1]
[edit on 14-5-2006 by ULTIMA1]