It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Liberal1984
But I think the real question will always be how long should it be valid in the present? Does America not have at least one big thing to learn from Europe?
being hit by a car, or dying at home with no one around them or able to pay much attention to what's going wrong with them.
After all the alternative and (and Nazi style final solution) to all suicidal terrorism problems will be to deport the lot of them (just America did to Japanese people in World War 2).
Always reacting and never accessing is very much an American thing; and to the worlds disbenerfit
Originally posted by Nygdan
There's really nothing stopping other nations in the 'world' from looking out for 'the world', but none of them seem interested in doing so.
Originally posted by Liberal1984
Firstly Nygdan I don't fully understand the link between European tyrants and an NHS.
Basically what I’m saying is that nobody should have to pay for being ill.
(hence the bureaucrats who run the thing can rip the country of).
all tax money was the peoples by destiny first.
if they spent their money protecting people from threats both health and foreign related on more or less equal terms?
As far as being a Christian nation that idea makes me want to kind of laugh
looking out for the world is (poverty in africa, climate change etc), something america isn't interested in,
but something europe (especially britain) is trying to push nations into stopping & preventing
Originally posted by Nygdan
So yes, america doesn't 'care' about the world all that much, I recognize that. BUt why should america be expected to care about it??
Originally posted by st3ve_o
and the WHOLE world saw your govenment doesn't care about YOUR OWN PEOPLE after the last huricane.
leave everyone to rot heh, lets all have your attitude
Originally posted by st3ve_o
i'm british but just wondering why the US doesn't have a 'national health system' (NHS)??
how do americans feel about this as an whole??
news.yahoo.com...
The percentage of individuals earning less than $20,000 a year without insurance rose to 53 percent, up from 49 percent in 2001. Overall, the percentage of people without insurance rose to 28 percent in 2005 from 24 percent in 2001.
The study also found that 59 percent of uninsured with chronic conditions such as asthma or diabetes either skipped a dose of their medicine or went without it because it was too expensive. One-third of them
One-third of those in that group visited an emergency room or stayed in a hospital overnight or did both, compared to 15 percent of their insured counterparts.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
its the same if you (or anyone) ever visted the UK and if you took ill over here, even though your not british you would still be treated at no cost!!
now if i visted america on an holiday (or if i was an american cizizen) if i ever took seriously bad, by the end of all the treatment i could be $1000's in-debt!!
Originally posted by arnold_vosloo
that is a big problem to the NHS as ONLY UK & EU citizens are treated for free,
Originally posted by st3ve_o
@ nygdan
we pay tax, but it isn't too high!!
but don't all these 'lower taxes' amount back up (probably to an even greater level) when people have to pay health insurance?
what happens when people cannot afford health insurance - die?
also say if you got made redundant in america today you'd basicly be screwed (unless you went into another job straight away)!!
your govenment gives no means (or very little) to support the 'unemployed' you may say "well get another job" but theres not jobs out there for EVERYONE, even if you manage to get a new job, it usually takes a few weeks - but how are you supposed to support yourself/family during this period?
education - college is free over here, yet in america what chance do young americans have to better themselfs if they come from a poor background?
but by signing the 'dotted line' to be a solider, you may well be signing your death certificate (what good is an education then)?
is a little old fashioned and out of date for the 21st century.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
a govenment is formed to make decisions to move your country foward/protect the citizens/make decisions to give a citizen of the country the best chance in life!!
isn't america 'the land of opportunity' - yet very few will get this opportunity and suceed with it due to 'old fashioned' traditions,
1) to have an education you need money.
so basicly the poor in the 'richest' country in the world, live 3rd world??