posted on May, 1 2006 @ 09:58 AM
I’m not sure it has… I for one was sure that the colective rulers of the world was the NWO, now it seems I can’t use
this label anymore.
Why? One thing is I thought the NWO wanted about a 3 major governments to rule, it seems that the NWO only wants one. (Hegelian dialectic?) So if I
believe in 3, I can’t use the term.
I believe that globalization is the work of the NWO, I even admitted that members of the NWO often fight amongst each other. Again, no. Unless you
believe that the group always
all work for a single purpose on absolutely everything.
There is no NWO!
Who exactly can define NWO. I know that my definition of a NWO and Alex Jones’ version of a NWO is quite different.
If the first use of the term “New World Order” was by HG Well in 1940
, does that mean that the true NWO is Fabian socialist?
Sadly even the ATSwiki entry for NWO
is not yet able to answer this question.
Does anyone see backgroud colors in the Avatar box?