This topic is in the New World Order discussion forum.  (rss)


Communist Rules For Revolution! Have they reached their goals?




Topic started on 28-4-2006 @ 05:07 PM by Chezz


The following is an excerpt from the Vampire Killers 2000 booklet.


HAVE THEY REACHED THEIR GOALS?

COMMUNIST RULES FOR REVOLUTION (Captured at Dusseldorf in May 1919 by Allied Forces)


Corrupt the young; get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.

By specious argument cause the breakdown of old moral virtues; honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.

Encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward such disorders. (L.A. riots were just a coincidence? ... Of course!)

Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance. (Racial differences?)

Get people's minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays, and other trivialities.

Get control of all means of publicity. (Media)

Destroy the people's faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and obloquy (disgrace).

Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with a view to confiscation and leaving the population helpless.


You can read this booklet in it's entirety here
www.lawfulpath.com...

Have they reached their goals?

Mod Edit: Caps Title – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 28/4/2006 by Umbrax]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-4-2006 @ 05:25 PM by HardToGet


Wow, looks like a totalitarian agenda which could fit right in the current political climate.

Good find Chezz, thanks.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-4-2006 @ 08:20 PM by Nathabeanz


Yeah that is quite an interesting find lots to read on the site. But whats with the name?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-4-2006 @ 08:28 PM by Nygdan


The 'document' is a fake.

www.snopes.com...

It simply doesn't exist, anywhere. Its a fabrication.

Also, 1919, seems a little early for them to be using illuminati-esque world-take over schemes. Communist plots were more along the line of 'Light the fuse, throw the bomb into the market, and then wait for the proletariate to rise up against the bourgoise exploiters! *raises fist* "



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-4-2006 @ 09:09 PM by Chezz


Ok thanks for pointing that out. I'm sure it will go along way with "Cug." I guess you can't believe everything you read on the internet and you learn something new everyday. Here is what I was looking for which basically says the same thing.


Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto

www.uhuh.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow"> www.uhuh.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-4-2006 @ 09:26 PM by denythestatusquo



Originally posted by Nygdan

www.snopes.com...

It simply doesn't exist, anywhere. Its a fabrication.

Also, 1919, seems a little early for them to be using illuminati-esque world-take over schemes. Communist plots were more along the line of 'Light the fuse, throw the bomb into the market, and then wait for the proletariate to rise up against the bourgoise exploiters! *raises fist* "


Funny but the snopes site doesn't explain why the document is a fake so I'll take their well meaning assertions with a grain of salt.

All the same do you agree that any of the mentioned goals seem to have been achieved or strived for in our current western societies?

I thought the Illuminati has been around for 100's of years and that communism known under different terms like the Fabians in London existed pre the 1919 revolution? I'm sure of it.

The rabble that Rothschild and buddies paid for to start the communist revolution in Russia were working to a script even though they were not aware of it. It was called the communist manifesto.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 28-4-2006 @ 09:29 PM by HardToGet



Originally posted by Nygdan
Also, 1919, seems a little early for them to be using illuminati-esque world-take over schemes. Communist plots were more along the line of 'Light the fuse, throw the bomb into the market, and then wait for the proletariate to rise up against the bourgoise exploiters! *raises fist* "


Still, it has been around in this form since at least 1946:

From the Urban Legends site:


The earliest known publication of these rules was in the periodical Moral Re-Armament in February 1946, and circulation of the list really took off after Florida state attorney George A. Brautigam endorsed them as true in 1954.


Who could have written such a document and to what end?

Still scary if this kind of propaganda has surfaced 1946.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-4-2006 @ 12:53 AM by Chezz


On this one, i'm inclined to take the side of denythestatusquo when he says to Ngydan


Funny but the snopes site doesn't explain why the document is a fake so I'll take their well meaning assertions with a grain of salt.

All the same do you agree that any of the mentioned goals seem to have been achieved or strived for in our current western societies?


I've been having a good debate with "Cug" as far as "real research" goes.

Ngydan-I'm not about to debate you on this one, as I have no real reason to think that what you're saying isn't true. (And also you're the moderator and I don't want to get in trouble.)

However, based on the conversations I've had with "Cug", can you provide anymore verification as to the source of the "inauthenticity" of the document in question?

Also, do you agree or disagree with what it says, the authenticity of the document itself notwithstanding?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-4-2006 @ 01:48 AM by Nygdan



Originally posted by denythestatusquo

Originally posted by Nygdan

www.snopes.com...

It simply doesn't exist, anywhere. Its a fabrication.

Also, 1919, seems a little early for them to be using illuminati-esque world-take over schemes. Communist plots were more along the line of 'Light the fuse, throw the bomb into the market, and then wait for the proletariate to rise up against the bourgoise exploiters! *raises fist* "


Funny but the snopes site doesn't explain why the document is a fake so I'll take their well meaning assertions with a grain of salt.

Did you miss the part about it not ever evening being heard of before the post wwii period? That there's no record of it ever having been found by anyone, anywhere? Nor that the first mentions of it cite a specific newspaper, but there was never any such article in that paper?


All the same do you agree that any of the mentioned goals seem to have been achieved or strived for in our current western societies?

The point is, its not communists that are doing this, and that this list was manufactured by liars to smear people that they didn't like and appeal to irrational emotive responses from the public.

IOW, its an attempt at manipulation. Why just gloss over that??

The site that is supposed to have the list doesn't work

10 Planks within the Communist Manifesto
www.geocities.com...

  1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.
  2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
  3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance

  4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels
  5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly
  6. Centralization of the means of communication and transportation in the hands of the State
  7. Extention of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
  8. Equal liablity of all to labor. Establishment of Industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
  9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.
  10. Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc. etc.


I'm suspicious of this list too, as I can't seem to find any communist sites that outline the "10 Planks" of the Communist Manifesto. Communists aren't secretive about what they want. It seems like these are re-wordings of what might've been said in the book, perhaps distorted so as to make them fit into the intent of the author.

So what I'd like to see, is a more detailed explanation of where in the manifesto these items are. Presumably they're not present as a simple list either.

The site I got the list from states that marx was using them as a test of whether or not a country is communist, if it meets all 10 its, communist. Clearly, the US is not communist.There is still private property, for example. The idea that the Federal Reserve is some sort of government monopoly on all credit doesn't fly either. The 'means of communication' clearly aren't held by the state. Then it cites labour unions as meaning that labour in the US is 'equal' along communist lines.ANd there certianly hasn't been any 'abolition of the distinction between town and country'. As far as free public education, jebus, if that's communist, then paint me red and give me a hammer! The thing is, its NOT communist to have public education, communists have a state monopoly on education, you wouldn't be permited to have each state determine its own educational curriculation, largely based on what the local school districts and communities WANT to teach, nor be able to attend private schools, or be home schooled, or drop out of school. ANd as far as taxes being 'heavy', they're not, US taxes are lower than lots of other countries, and a progressive tax makes a helluva lot of sense. THis is nothing like in a communist system, heck, the idea of taxes upon labour wages doesn't really even make sense in a communist system.

Nope, the US is still capitalist, not communist.


And Just to be clear, I think communism is horrible, and should be erradicated. Slander and irrational emotive appeals to base instincts aint' a good thing either, and thats what these 'THe US is Communist! The US is nazi!" Arguments are all about.



And also you're the moderator and I don't want to get in trouble


Er? Why the heck would you get in trouble? As long as you aren't abusing other members and attacking them, etc etc.


Still scary if this kind of propaganda has surfaced 1946.

But the point is, its not from communists, its from fear mongers who want to provoke a reaction from a frightened public, project their fears onto a scapegoat/fake enemy (not that communists aren't dangerous, but they DIDN"T make that document), in order to manipulate them. In a sense, its actually doing the very thing that it is trying to get peopel in a panic about the communists doing!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 29-4-2006 @ 02:31 AM by Cug



Originally posted by Nygdan

I'm suspicious of this list too, as I can't seem to find any communist sites that outline the "10 Planks" of the Communist Manifesto. Communists aren't secretive about what they want. It seems like these are re-wordings of what might've been said in the book, perhaps distorted so as to make them fit into the intent of the author.

So what I'd like to see, is a more detailed explanation of where in the manifesto these items are. Presumably they're not present as a simple list either.



Here is a text version of Karl Marx's The Communist Manifesto www.gutenberg.org...

The list starts on line 969 near the end of Section II

The link that was posted had some Libertarian propaganda after each point comparing it to the present day. For example they equate the abolition of property with our property taxes.

NOTE I'm a registered Libertarian, but that doesn't mean I can't spot propaganda when I see it


Originally posted by Chezz
However, based on the conversations I've had with "Cug", can you provide anymore verification as to the source of the "inauthenticity" of the document in question?


Can you see the difference between snopes.com a site that has no agenda about the issue of the NWO, and generally considered a good site about hoaxes/urban legands vs a site that is promoting that there is a NWO? Or even a site promoting there is no NWO.

one of these things is not like the other

[edit on 4/29/2006 by Cug]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-5-2008 @ 04:21 AM by Anonymous ATS


reply to post by Cug



The Great Betrayal of the British People Part 3 - The Fabian
We have since seen under Attley a Fabian, Harold Wilson a communist (from .... Our Queen is no longer head of this country, she is in fact just an illusion. ...
www.tpuc.org/node/62

Fabians are in power in the UK, Blair was the chairman of the Fabian society his new cabinet when they won the election was made up of young Fabians.
Fabians,Marxist,nazis,fascists communists all the same rolled into one with exactly united aims.
TPUC well worth reading every entry, John Harris has taken on the state and become a freeman. Many hope to follow his example!
VJ.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:
































ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.033 seconds
Page processed in 0.310 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread