It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Chezz
Also, a mistake was pointed out to me that I incorrectly translated the seal on the back of the dollar bill. My mistake. I was wrong about that translation, but that one mistake does not negate everything I've posted.
Originally posted by Chezz
So please...if you want to debate the NWO, at least do A LITTLE research on the subject BEFORE coming into the debate, so I and others like me, don't have to start from scratch with every skeptic that comes along.
Originally posted by Chezz
Recently, I posted a thread challenging skeptics to prove there ISN'T a NWO.
www.abovetopsecret.com...'
This was done in response to a thread challenging people to prove there IS a NWO.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I have gotten alot of repsonses (both pro and con) to my initial thread.
I appreciate all of them and always enjoy a lively debate.
HOWEVER...one of the things I've noticed on both these threads is that the people who don't think the NWO exists aren't doing any research to find out whether it does or not.
www.lawfulpath.com...
[edit on 28-4-2006 by Chezz]
Mod Edit: All Caps Title – Please Review This Link.
[edit on 28/4/2006 by Umbrax]
Then there is the 'suspension of disbelief' crowd which cannot tolerate difficult and radical truths that 'go outside the box.' You have to take into consideration the fragile state of their existance and how perilious it is and their strong efforts to protect it.
Think of the 'Matrix films' and then you will get an idea of what you are up against here.
Originally posted by Chezz
Again, start with vampire killers 2000. There's a link where you can read the whole thing at the bottom of my last post. Start with that, READ IT, it's not that long (maybe 45 minutes to an hour) and let's take it from there.
As far as Rockefeller and his book, no I haven't personally read the book, but if you google the words "Rockefeller memoirs guilty proud" you will get 37,900 hits.
www.lawfulpath.com...
MAYER AMSCHEL BAUER, (alias Rothschild/Head Bloodsucker) The Godfather of the Rothschild Banking Cartel of Europe stated, "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
Originally posted by Cug
www.lawfulpath.com...
MAYER AMSCHEL BAUER, (alias Rothschild/Head Bloodsucker) The Godfather of the Rothschild Banking Cartel of Europe stated, "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws."
Head bloodsucker... That's the type of thing that makes me lose respect for something right away.
HAVE THEY REACHED THEIR GOALS?
COMMUNIST RULES FOR REVOLUTION (Captured at Dusseldorf in May 1919 by Allied Forces)
Corrupt the young; get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.
By specious argument cause the breakdown of old moral virtues; honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.
Encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward such disorders. (L.A. riots were just a coincidence? ... Of course!)
Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance. (Racial differences?)
Get people's minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays, and other trivialities.
Get control of all means of publicity. (Media)
Destroy the people's faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and obloquy (disgrace).
Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with a view to confiscation and leaving the population helpless.
Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder.
George Washington
Originally posted by Chezz
HAVE THEY REACHED THEIR GOALS?
COMMUNIST RULES FOR REVOLUTION (Captured at Dusseldorf in May 1919 by Allied Forces)
Corrupt the young; get them away from religion. Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; destroy their ruggedness.
By specious argument cause the breakdown of old moral virtues; honesty, sobriety, continence, faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.
Encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward such disorders. (L.A. riots were just a coincidence? ... Of course!)
Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance. (Racial differences?)
Get people's minds off their government by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books, plays, and other trivialities.
Get control of all means of publicity. (Media)
Destroy the people's faith in their natural leaders by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and obloquy (disgrace).
Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with a view to confiscation and leaving the population helpless.
Have they reached their goals?
What do you mean by "real research?"
Originally posted by Chezz
Let me ask you something. What, in your mind, would be "research?"
I've pointed you to all kinds of links, even three ENTIRE BOOKS, but you keep coming back saying "That's not research."
Again, without physically buying the books, the internet is all we have. But even if we did buy the books, you could still say "How do you know he said that?" Whatever it may be.
You read my other post in the "illuminati question" where I said "The evidence of the NWO's presence is stronger than the proof of their absence." and I stand by that.
You seem like a smart guy/gal? And I don't think you're trying to flame me, but I'm sort getting the impression that no matter what I say or give you to read, you'll come back saying "That's not proof." If that's the case then we'll have to agree to disagree.
So i'll refer back to the original question. If there isn't a conspiracy to rule the world (NWO) why isn't there? Through your own research, can you prove to me there isn't one? I hope you can and that I'm wrong about the whole NWO thing, believe me. But I don't think you can.
I've read MANY, MANY REAL Books about the NWO, secret societies, the federal reserve, Council on Foreign Relations, Phrophesy, etc. (And I mean REAL BOOKS not online stuff) Isn't that research?
To me, it doesn't sound like you're too far off anyway. Look at the Patriot Act, look at the gun control laws, look at the drug laws. Do laws like that protect our freedoms? Look at all the surveilence cameras sprouting up.
Don't know if you saw or not so here it is again. This is from the vampire killers.
COMMUNIST RULES FOR REVOLUTION
Have they reached their goals?
Ok thanks for pointing that out. I'm sure it will go along way with "Cug." I guess you can't believe everything you read on the internet and you learn something new everyday. Here is what I was looking for which basically says the same thing.
Ten Planks of the Communist Manifesto
www.uhuh.com...
Can anyone say this isn't exactly what's happening today?
For some reason the "quote" thing isn't working the way I want.
[edit on 28-4-2006 by Chezz]
[edit on 29-4-2006 by Chezz]
[edit on 29-4-2006 by Chezz]
And when did I say there was not conspiracy to rule the world? What I'm saying there is no NWO.
The plan to rule the world hasn't always been refered to as the "New World Order." But irregarless what it's referred to as (The Great Plan, The universal Motion, Globilization. The New Atlantis, New World Order, etc) is pretty much irrelivant in my opinion, because no matter what it's called, the goal has ALWAYS been the same:to rule the world.
Originally posted by Chezz
I'm also looking forward to your response to my "George Washington" question.
Few men have virtue to withstand the highest bidder.
George Washington
Can you prove he didn't say that?
If we read that he said that in a "book" any book, who's to say that's proof that Washington actually said that?
I'm sure it's obvious, but I am NOT actually advocating the idea that George Washington never existed. I'm asking how would one go about proving that he did. I believe that he did, but after giving the matter some thought, I have to ask myself too, how could I prove it, or is it provable? If so, how?
What it seems to me is that the main thing is that we do both apparently agree that there is a conspiracy to rule the world. What they refer to that conspiracy as, whatever they call it, is redundant.