It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Reading the protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is enough evidence for me that the Illuminati exists. Then in turn look at the world and how it is today, its clear to me that they have achieved practically all their goals. I don't really see the protocols as prophetic but more less a proposed plan.
Originally posted by EdenKaia
If you go into that forum listed, you will see that myself, Nygdan, and many others have presented the evidence against the Protocols.
Originally posted by Crazy_Mr_Crowley
The Illuminati exists for sure. Encyclopedia Brittanica says that they were formed in Bavaria in May 1st 1776 but later on went underground in Freemasonry in North America. Convieniently they don't say anything more.
And when it comes to Freemasonry once you reach the 33rd you could be selected for Illuminism, Illuminated Degrees. But Masonry is a great way for them to weed out good people and keep them in the dark while the people consumed with greed find their way in.
Originally posted by Crazy_Mr_Crowley
Unfortunately your going to have to track down a set of the books from 1960-1970.
I know it says it in the 66 version for sure.
I didn't specify which right. maybe Illuminated degrees aren't well known to you lower masons in North America but I am aware that in Europe it's more well known.
The Illuminati never disbanded in the 19th century. All you have to do is follow their symbols and oyu'll see they are alive and well. The USD pyramid - the same pyramid at the Israeli Supreme Court (hehe follow the money)
You keep saying this, but this has not be done. Especially by Nygdan, (he is debating the Priory's non-existance, not the protocols. They are not the same!) the only one who claims this is you. I've told you before that only 16% was copied from the dialogue. So please stop claiming it has been debunked until you have clearly done so.
Originally posted by EdenKaia
Call the percentage whatever you want. The fact that ANYTHING was copied is proof enough. How do you take something that was originally referring to someone else, copy it down, and then say that it was entirely different? Was it just that the writer was too lazy to write down what REALLY happened, so therefore decided to copy something that "seemed to closely" fit and call it good?
Originally posted by EdenKaia
They are rewritten over and over again, with changes being made to fit the current user.
Cohn's arithmetic is incorrect. The word-count of the parallel-passages from the Protocols, as listed by Bernstein (at bernstein.zip), is 4,361, while the word-count of the Protocols is 26, 496. That is, the parallel passages comprise 16.45% of the Protocols; this is substantial, but still less than one sixth of the total. What Cohn especially omits to mention, is the Protocols' extensive coverage of the world finance system.
Source: users.cyberone.com.au...
Was it just that the writer was too lazy to write down what REALLY happened
Cohn admits that the Protocols was ignored until World War I and the Bolshevik Revolution, 20 or so years after it was written (Warrant For Genocide, pp. 14-15, pp. 124-5).
If it were a forgery designed to stir up pogroms etc, one would think that the forgers had failed, since it had no effect for 20 years
Source: users.cyberone.com.au...
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
ML 16% proves plagiarism but that doesn’t mean the documents are fake. Are you guys all positive that Russian Intelligence did all of this?
It was not written for academics. It was written as a guide to controlling the world. A forged version of it could be use to ferment hatred against a race. I could take the document, and quickly replace all instances of jews with freemasons inner circle and replace goyim with cowan. (I'm sure some would even fall for it. ) I would have an instant propaganda tool against freemasonry. Isn’t it possible that the Russian police did the same to forment hatred for the jews? Do we know for a fact that they didn't?
Cohn admits that the Protocols was ignored until World War I and the Bolshevik Revolution, 20 or so years after it was written (Warrant For Genocide, pp. 14-15, pp. 124-5).
If it were a forgery designed to stir up pogroms etc, one would think that the forgers had failed, since it had no effect for 20 years
Have you even read the Protocols EdenKaia?
16% proves plagiarism but that doesn’t mean the documents are fake. Are you guys all positive that Russian Intelligence did all of this?
It was not written for academics. It was written as a guide to controlling the world. A forged version of it could be use to ferment hatred against a race. I could take the document, and quickly replace all instances of jews with freemasons inner circle and replace goyim with cowan. (I'm sure some would even fall for it. ) I would have an instant propaganda tool against freemasonry. Isn’t it possible that the Russian police did the same to forment hatred for the jews? Do we know for a fact that they didn't?
Originally posted by EdenKaia
If you read the above posts, you will find the verification you need to tell you how BOTH have been proven fakes
Originally posted by EdenKaia
No one has said that the documents are FAKE, what was said is that they are a FORGERY of previous documents.
Joly himself appears to have plagiarized a good amount of the material from a popular novel by Eugène Sue, The Mysteries of the People, in which the plotters were Jesuits
source: en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Nakash
- Kerensky (leader of the Mencheviks) BANNED it in Russia. Even though he reigned for less than a year or so, it was one of the first things he did.
-Stalin was a fervent reader of the Talmud. His wife was a jewess as well.
- Hitler made deals with the Roschild family, ie: holocaust Gold for credit
Originally posted by ConspiracyNut23
Originally posted by EdenKaia
If you read the above posts, you will find the verification you need to tell you how BOTH have been proven fakes
Originally posted by EdenKaia
No one has said that the documents are FAKE, what was said is that they are a FORGERY of previous documents.
I couldn’t resist.
Chomsky pointed out that the system of globalization widens the gap between the rich and the poor because the agreements themselves are made strictly for and between the rich. This chasm lies not only between individuals, but between rich and poor countries as well.
Source: www-tech.mit.edu...
one percent of the U.S. population owns fifty percent of the stock, while eighty percent of the population owns four percent of stock. The economy, Chomsky said, “is a fairy tale for the rich.”
Source: www-tech.mit.edu...
Originally posted by SkepticOverlord
Originally posted by MrNECROS
all the other retarded morons here
This is the reason for your warning.
Also, in the event you have not yet noticed, ATS is a destination for free and open discussion on a variety of topics. Asking for a collaborative discussion on the evidence for/against something like the Illuminati is certainly within the topical focus of what we do here.