It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jritzmann
Originally posted by Cade
Look, if you reached your conclusions on the Edward Meier case, in the same manner you concluded that my research is based on an hour of video, everything is falling into place for me real fast.
You said it I didnt. You said after "watching" the documentatries you were convinced.
So, when you state that, what is one to believe about you.
Me? I base my opinion of your "research" on saying that it's an authentic case. Thats more then enough to me.
If you'd like to see all the "real" expert testimony (i.e. selectively edited quotes to make a one sided point) go check this nutjob's site:
www.theyfly.com...
Then go thru and follow up on all they claim. I'm confident if you do, you'll arrive where I'm standing.
If you engage in excessive quoting, you will receive a "warning" and points penalty. Examples of what would cause a warning for an excessive quote are:
Quote the post immediately before yours: This doesn't make much sense, but if you must quote the post before yours, please quote just a small portion.
Originally posted by Cade
Where do you get this stuff...?
Originally posted by jritzmann
Originally posted by Cade
Where do you get this stuff...?
Great response. Lemme give ya a clue, it's not on any pro-Meier videos.
When you can do more then shout how "true" the case is with your apparent limited knowledge of the cases obvious flaws and shortcomings, lemme know.
Originally posted by Cade
Deal. But then again, I stated from the beginning that I would do no such thing. I state that I belive the Meier case and that everyone should do their own looking into it, and not be intimidated by the Meier hammers on this or any forum. Go look for yourself you misled masses of seekers, and let no other man ever lead you again.
Originally posted by jritzmann
I mislead people? I doubt that, as I've always pointed people in the direction to look into it themselves.
You state several time how people are supposed to look into it themselves, however what you dont even seem to know is the "hammers" as you call them have no real outlet for information as does the Meier media machine (i.e. FIGU and Horn), who give out "press releases" and Horn who manages to widdle his way onto every talk radio show to peddle his crap.
See, what makes "good entertainment" is the outlandish garbage published by these people...not us who point out the obvious and major flaws and half-truths...not to mention the cheesiest of photos that a child wouldnt believe.
People tune in to hear the unreal and either buy into it or laugh at it. It's entertainment. And thats all it is.
Maybe it's about time there was an information clearing house for those of us who see thru this transparent case.
People buy into this case for alot of reasons, and I dont claim to know your reason. But if one looks good enough at the case, the people involved, and data, it's not the evidence.
If you "investigated" as good as you claim, then your answer to the straight points I listed wouldnt be "where do you get this stuff?" Youre mind is made up, but you obviously cant say why, nor can you attest to the facts of the case. You must believe to be a believer.
This is all case in point to why man will never learn more about this enigma then we do...everyone wants a fairy tale.
Meanwhile the truth does it's thing, and goes unnoticed.
[edit on 12-5-2006 by jritzmann]