I disagree.
It is quite clear that this is a 'systemic failure' going back years (the figures quoted to date talk about 1996 = tory gov years).
That being the case the convention is that the SoS under whom the problem is revealed is not expected to 'carry the can'.
As Michael Howard (ex tory SoS for the Home Office and leader of the tory party/HM opposition) made it perfectly plain when he was the SoS at the Home
Office, the SoS cannot be expected to micromanage the department.
Link
It's not a great story and it's quite clear the Home Office is, still, one of the most problematic areas of government (as it has been for decades
and under all 'colours' of government) but to lay this all at CC's door and expect a resignation is IMO a denial of the facts as well as petty and
opportunistic politicing of the highest order (and shows what are the real 'concerns' of the opposition parties in this).
[Mod Edit: Link format - Jak]
[edit on 2/5/06 by JAK]