It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Souljah
Is there a Headline today that does NOT involve Iran here?
Simply amazing.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
If the shoe fits...............
I seem to recall a few weeks ago whee every other headline was Iran had this weapon system or this boat. They were building their own jet engines and their aircraft industry was doing great.
Originally posted by Souljah
And?
Actually they are playing by the "rules" of the "game" which they did not invent - this "game" was already in place before they tried to obtain all sorts of military technology. And - so what? How many jet engines and aircraft industry does USA have? And - does anybody protest against it? Does anybody write about that? Nope.
Hate the GAME - don't hate the PLAYA.
Originally posted by Mdv2
If you time after time mention your nuclear activities are for peaceful purposes only, and in the meanwhile illegally try to obtain information about weapons of mass destruction, that's quite suspicious isn't it?
Originally posted by sensfan
The Dutch have WMDs? Are they part of the Axis of evil yet?
Couldn't resist. Sorry. Not trying to make light.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Mdv: Can you provide a link to that, I can't find it anywhere online, thanks.
Also, it says "secret Dutch information about mass destruction weapons".
Does this mean blueprints? Sketches? Info the Dutch have on Russian WMDs?
Which is why the link would help, because this info on its own is only dangerous if you're paranoid.
www.acronym.org.uk...
Abdul Qadeer Khan had undertaken postgraduate work in metallurgical engineering in West Germany and Belgium, receiving his Ph.D. from the Catholic University of Leuven in 1972. He found employment working for the Anglo-Dutch-German centrifuge enrichment partnership, URENCO. In 1974, Khan wrote Bhutto that he was willing to return and work for Pakistan. He left URENCO in 1976, bringing with him stolen centrifuge designs and, perhaps more importantly, a list of 100 companies that supplied centrifuge parts and materials. After a brief stint within the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission structure, he moved to the Engineering Research Laboratories, setting up a uranium enrichment plant in Kahuta. Within four years of returning home, his progress was significant enough that then-President Zia ul-Haq renamed the facility. Khan Research Laboratories (KRL) was born.8
As stated before, I haven't been able to find and English sources yet, but here you can find a short summary of the annual report:
Originally posted by skippytjc
The only Dutch WMD's I am aware of are cartoons depicting Muhammad.
And they were devastating too, all you need to do is publish them and Muslims start rioting and killing themselves by the dozens all over the world.
And to comment on the real story here:
Is anybody suprised by this? How much have they stolen we arent aware of? For every instance we learn about, there are most likely many more instances we will never know about.
[edit on 1-5-2006 by skippytjc]
Originally posted by twitchy
Shouldn't we be bombing the crap out the Dutch then? Sanctions? Invasion and occupation? No, that's right, they can have WMD's because they aren't 'out to get you'. People have been gathering stones together since we learned to throw them, kind of sick really, but what's really sick is sitting on a rock pile and and bitching about others collecting the gravel that rolls off it from time to time.
Originally posted by Jakomo
Mdv2:
As stated before, I haven't been able to find and English sources yet, but here you can find a short summary of the annual report:
So how do you know what it says? You speak Dutch?
Until I can find a way to translate this, I'll reserve the right to call bs.
Iran is only mentioned twice in the article from what I can see.
-jako
Originally posted by skippytjc
The only Dutch WMD's I am aware of are cartoons depicting Muhammad.
And they were devastating too, all you need to do is publish them and Muslims start rioting and killing themselves by the dozens all over the world.
And to comment on the real story here:
Is anybody suprised by this? How much have they stolen we arent aware of? For every instance we learn about, there are most likely many more instances we will never know about.
[edit on 1-5-2006 by skippytjc]
quote: Originally posted by sensfan
The Dutch have WMDs? Are they part of the Axis of evil yet?
Right, because, you know, all those Dutch extremists who are talking about destroying other nations. Oh wait, sorry, my bad, there AREN'T ANY.
Shouldn't we be bombing the crap out the Dutch then? Sanctions? Invasion and occupation? No, that's right, they can have WMD's because they aren't 'out to get you'. People have been gathering stones together since we learned to throw them, kind of sick really, but what's really sick is sitting on a rock pile and and bitching about others collecting the gravel that rolls off it from time to time
Originally posted by teknobass
Originally posted by Marid Audran
Right, because, you know, all those Dutch extremists who are talking about destroying other nations. Oh wait, sorry, my bad, there AREN'T ANY.
Well, there are. Ever heard of the terrorist group called "de Hofstadgroep" . Currently in custody, but one member of this group killed dutch moviemaker Theo van Gogh in december 2004 for islamic reasons.
[...]Takfir wal-Hijra's ideology is so extreme that in 1996 the group plotted to assassinate Osama bin Laden, supposedly for being insufficiently radical. Many also considered the Taliban movement in Afghanistan to be unbelievers.
Originally posted by Beachcoma
Interesting. Just did some reading on "de Hofstadgroep" a.k.a. the Hosftad Network. They folow the idology of another bag of nuts called Takfir wal-Hijra (Arabic تكفير والهجرة - Excommunication and Exodus) whose:
[...]Takfir wal-Hijra's ideology is so extreme that in 1996 the group plotted to assassinate Osama bin Laden, supposedly for being insufficiently radical. Many also considered the Taliban movement in Afghanistan to be unbelievers.
They think Osama's not radical enough?