It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

No wonder Iran has suddenly become brazen; they have just received the brand new BM-25’s…

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 13 2006 @ 12:38 PM
link   
HimWhoHathAnEar, so yea why did not the soviets do it before their system collapsed? Why have not the Chinese done it as of late? They are obviously much mroe capable than Iran at pulling this off. Oh wait they are our friends and our friends never ever think about anything we do as bad and consider eliminating the global stranglehold we have on everyone. What about North Korea? They actually have the reason and the capabilites.

So I guess Iran, because of the fact they are "radcial extremists" instantly gives them the ability to avoid satellite surveillance completely of the only facilities where such a weapon could leave from, avoid being seen by any of the Naval forces in the gulf, or if they chose avoid being seen going through Iraq and Israel to get to the Mediterranean, and then also manage to avoid any Naval forces to positio themselves in the American waters. And then since its on a boat now and it would not even be able to hold the equipment required to phsically "launch" the nuke over water and the mainland, which could not possibly be detected by any of our systems of course, it has to actually be transported onto land. Seeing as it is now on land, it would have to be somehow put into the air or the top of a very tall building to even try to have the effect which will throw us back into the 1800's.

Of course absolutley nobody else on Earth who harbors these weapons and would have a better chance of pulling it off would seek to benefit from this kind of action. If Iran had a glimme rof a chance to pull it off, then it would have already been done by other more capable nations.

Noone is doubting the affects or possiblity the weapon has to achieve its goal. I am doubt the reasoning and even logistical capability to believe any nation would do it.

My spelling is irrelevant because these accusations merit no respect.




posted on May, 13 2006 @ 06:05 PM
link   
I'm not sure what accusation you're refering to. The Report to Congress I guess?


At any rate, the reason the Soviet Union never did it, is probably because we had them pegged with 10-15 thousand nuclear warhead's. I believe it was called the Cold War. Mutually Assured Destruction kept cool head's and no one was willing to throw an ICBM up over anyone, for any reason!

I don't know if you've noticed, but our trade deficit with China is what's funding their rise to SuperPower status. So, why would they want to kill the the goose that lay's the golden egg's for them?

North Korea may not have their missile's quite right for that distance with a nuclear payload. But they're working hard I'm sure!

Shipping a missile to Cuba is not quite as hard as you make it sound. The Soviet's didn't seem to have a huge problem with it in the early sixtie's. Maybe you remember the Cuban Missile Crisis? Oh that's right, Castro was involved in that wasn't he? Matter of fact, Castro went over to Iran after the revolution. Been good buddie's ever since. I believe Ahmidinejab is do to go there this summer.

Anyway's if you don't believe it, just ignore it, it'll go away!



posted on May, 14 2006 @ 12:09 AM
link   
Yes as a matter of fact it will go away. And you will not even remember it because the media will be telling you to hate another country by then and you will have forgotten all about Iran.



posted on May, 14 2006 @ 11:32 AM
link   
The same media that harp's about how bad Iraq turned out! Do you believe they're the one's behind the scene's on pushing us into war's? It may be true, I don't know. Maybe they're scizo, or they play both side's for something to talk about. One thing for sure, they don't tell me what to think!



posted on May, 14 2006 @ 12:06 PM
link   
Well the thing is once they stop talking about Iran all over the news, are you going to continue to pursue the issue? I highly doubt it. However if there is a problem in another region in the world, the news will be all over it, and so probably will all the people who have pretty much pushed aside the Iran situation.

A couple years ago when North Korea was all over the news about stuff, so were the people on it about them. The news dropped the subject, picked up Iraq, Iran situation, and now thats what everyone here is talking about. I am not saying they are telling you what to think, I am simply stating my observations.



posted on May, 14 2006 @ 12:14 PM
link   
I agree that the masses operate that way. I've been watching Iran and North Korea for a long time. It is extremely frustrating when they don't cover the important stuff until it become's a serious matter. They like to talk about soap opera stuff like Duke or Aruba.

I think if they had started covering the 'Axis of Evil' on a continuous basis after 9/11 we might have a more educated populous.



new topics

top topics
 
0
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join