It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL STATION, Cuba — The Pentagon plans to release nearly a third of those held at the prison for terrorism suspects here because they pose no threat to U.S. security, an official of the war crimes tribunal said Monday.
Charges are pending against about two dozen of the remaining prisoners, the chief prosecutor said. But he left unclear why the rest face neither imminent freedom nor a day in court after as many as four years in custody.
Only 10 of the roughly 490 alleged "enemy combatants" currently detained at the facility have been charged; none has been charged with a capital offense.
That leaves the majority of the U.S. government's prisoners from the war on terrorism in limbo and its war crimes tribunal exposed to allegations by international human rights advocates that it is illegitimate and abusive.
Originally posted by darkhero
Should keep them there forever because they are going to be terrorists sooner or later.
Originally posted by Strangerous
Yeah you're right. It's all justified.
What if I said (hypothetically) I'm going to kidnap 1,000 Americans take them to a Spanish Island, hold them in cages, deny them any legal representation, interrogate them for 4 years and then let 980 of them go as part of my self-declared War on Fashion.
Would that be OK too?
Originally posted by Fett Pinkus
Originally posted by darkhero
Should keep them there forever because they are going to be terrorists sooner or later.
yes and you know why ? because they were held for 4 years and tortured , anyone held that long and tortured would probably do the same thing
Originally posted by Strangerous
You have descended to the level of terrorists:
Shoot them because they MAY be against you?
Lock them up for ever in case some of them are terrorists?
They should be grateful for a nice cage?
Allegedly attacked by an alleged dog and caught on an alleged photo? I'd remind you some of your soldiers were found guilty of this - nothing alleged about it at all.
If someone did this to your people you'd be the first to go on about right & wrong. It stinks and it's a stain on your country and any other that's involved or keeps quiet (including mine)
To put people through all that and only have 2% guilty of anything at the end of it shows how poor your methods, intelligence (in both senses) and morals have become.
Land of the Free?? Disgusting!
It's no wonder the World hates the current US regime
Originally posted by Fett Pinkus
I think kneeling in the sun on your knees for hours with a hood on your head or your face partially covered amounts to torture in my eyes from my western upbringing.I dont think it is really necessary to degrade humans like that and as for the other comments here on shooting them in the stomach and such, this is utterly disgusting and goes to show what regards you have for human life.
Originally posted by DaFunk13
I have to toss my hat in here real quick...
Rounding up every person with his head wrap and a rifle in his closet in Afghanistan is hardly justified as catching "terrorists." Thats everyone. We didn't capture armed combatants...we shot them. We jailed the unarmed ones. We ran in, in a flurry, and everything we deemed a threat that we didnt kill got stuffed into Gitmo. There is probably plenty of bad-guys who deserve that little 6x8, but I promise there are plenty that were just regular guys trying to survive a foreign invasion. Give em trials, or let em go. Every American should agree. If they run back to the Mideast and take up arms....well...you know how we do, and it won't be a cell.
We owe every single human being behind bars a fair shot to plead their case in court. The ones blowing people up and shooting folks are already killed. We dont take the time to disarm them and detain them. The ones locked up are locked up for information, just like Luda said. However, I won't cosign to the idea that it is ok.
Originally posted by Strangerous
Yeah you're right. It's all justified.
What if I said (hypothetically) I'm going to kidnap 1,000 Americans take them to a Spanish Island, hold them in cages, deny them any legal representation, interrogate them for 4 years and then let 980 of them go as part of my self-declared War on Fashion.
Would that be OK too?
I agree that they should be given their legal council and this whole process be sped up, but a majority of these detainees are listed as "illegal" combatants and can be held under law for a definate period of time, which is what is happening.
They are held until the US military feels they have no more intel to give or decide if they want to prosecute them. This is the part that is taking ridiculously long and I understand the problem with that, I feel the same way.
The only place I appear to differ with you on this issue is the idea that it is "ok" to detain these guys until we can be sure they arent someone who looks nice on the surface but will shoot you when your backs turned.