posted on Apr, 24 2006 @ 09:20 PM
1.) The Majestic 12
documents are copies on film
2.) The level at which you take a picture can determine the exact size of the signature when your reproduce it. I know this from professional
photographic experience, making Polaroid negatives on black and white for photo expansion.
reproduce exact copies of a signature, except for the original pen which may vary on the
ink intensity due to variables of pressure. Autopens reproduce signatures with constant mechanical pressure. Again an ordinary signature is variable
4.) Signatures can be identical without a cut and paste computer, or a xerox job for the photofilm duplicate.
Taking all these into account, once cannot prove conclusively that the MJ-12 documents are a "hoax," just for having an identical Truman signature,
even if the signature is slightly larger, since it is on photofilm. There is no proof that a cut and paste job was used, only observations explainable
by other means.
Please comment and prove this refutation of the refutation one way or another.
[edit on 24-4-2006 by SkipShipman]