It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by police_officer339
Does anyone think that the world and it's technology is progressing to the point where everyone will have Nukes, or even worse weapons?
What will happen then? The end of all we know?
>>>>>>>>>>
Originally posted by tsensel
The physics behind nuclear weapons is simple. A nuclear weapon can be designed and built by a highschool AP student. The problem is in finding fissionable materials.
I guess my problem with the whole situation is that, it's ok for pakistan to have nukes, it's ok for israel to have nukes, its ok for india to have nukes. But it's not ok for iran to have nukes.
You know, Armaggedon almost happened between india and pakistan. They were VERY close to blowing each other off the map. You heard nothing about this in news.
Iran is letting the IAE into iran to suspect their facilities, they have not been refused access to any sites as far as i'm aware. The conclusion so far is that they see "no divergance" of fissionable materials from the process of nuclear power to the process of weapons.
But yet, america is ready to nuke them in response. The double standard is amazing.
How many times has china threatened to nuke us within the past year?
I would say, all these things should be dismantled. But like I said before, its relatively easy enough to build a nuke. A nuclear holocaust may be inevitable.
Originally posted by the_sentinal
pieman you should have answered ZMAX on page two i think your bias was clearly showing on those comments you made. you say that iran should be allowed to have nukes as a counter-balence. THAT is the most hair-brained idea i have ever heard..they would go offensive if they had the capability tommorow!!
israel has shown they exercise restraint with the nukes they have.. therfore they should be allowed to continue to have them as a deterent to any aggressor that might pose a threat!!
but note worthy because of all the terrorist threats that are coming out of the middle-east the last few day's
NO because he/she must submit to the mullah (spiritual leader)
who teach annihilation of isreal and the destruction of america
Originally posted by the_sentinal
do you really believe that iran has been open and honest about their nuclear program?? it is known that IAEA inspectors were only allowed into (approved) sites for inspection... also having 40,000 suicide bombers on stand-by is not very respectful of the international community's stand on terrorism. which china is a part of. so why should anyone trust that they will handle nukes responsably???
Originally posted by tsensel
www.iaea.org...
www.iaea.org...
Nuclear energy is a stepping stone in the process of building an economy. Do you really think they can afford to power their country with oil and gas prices skyrocketing?
We use a lot of coal to supplement. I don't believe they have that luxury. Although i could very well be wrong about this (them not having coal supplies).
Originally posted by tsensel
Nuclear energy is a stepping stone in the process of building an economy. Do you really think they can afford to power their country with oil and gas prices skyrocketing?
They aren't asking for nuclear weapons. All they want is nuclear energy. Like i said previously, pakistan and india both have nukes. A LT General from the pakistan military wired 100,000$ to mohammad atta in the weeks preceeeding 9/11. Maybe next time he'll be wiring a nuclear bomb.
How do you know they have "40,000 suicide bombers"? where did you retrieve these statistics from?
IRAN has formed battalions of suicide bombers to strike at British and American targets if the nation’s nuclear sites are attacked. According to Iranian officials, 40,000 trained suicide bombers are ready for action.
The main force, named the Special Unit of Martyr Seekers in the Revolutionary Guards, was first seen last month when members marched in a military parade, dressed in olive-green uniforms with explosive packs around their waists and detonators held high.
Dr Hassan Abbasi, head of the Centre for Doctrinal Strategic Studies in the Revolutionary Guards, said in a speech that 29 western targets had been identified: “We are ready to attack American and British sensitive points if they attack Iran’s nuclear facilities.” He added that some of them were “quite close” to the Iranian border in Iraq.
At a recruiting station in Tehran recently, volunteers for the force had to show their birth certificates, give proof of their address and tick a box stating whether they would prefer to attack American targets in Iraq or Israeli targets.
www.timesonline.co.uk...
It is no countries intrest to harbor terrorism of any kind. It undermines their authority and influence on their society. Saddam hussein was very stern about not allowing terrorists on his soil. If i recall correctly, he had clashes with the taliban.
Originally posted by fritz
Trained suicide bombers? Please don't make me laugh!
How can you train somebody to be a suicide bomber? Think about it, people!
Seriously though, all you can do is show somebody how to put on the jacket or sit on a bomb. You cannot train them how to press the switch or push the button.
Originally posted by mad scientist
Thr domestic prices for Iranian oil ARE NOT skyrocketing, what you think it costs them the same rates as the west pays
Iran does wnat a nuclear weapons not just nuclear power, otherwise why would they reject Russia's offer to enrich the Uranium - the self suffiecny argument they parrot doesn't hold weight.
Hmm how about straight from the horse mouth.
IRAN has formed battalions of suicide bombers to strike at British and American targets if the nation’s nuclear sites are attacked. According to Iranian officials, 40,000 trained suicide bombers are ready for action.
Originally posted by the_sentinal
do you guy's really think that iran needs nuclear energy with all the oil & natural gas that they possess gas in iraq is a nickle a gallon so how bad could iran need nuclear energy.. ok so no one has really said they cant have it . russia offered to enrich their uranium for them but that wasnt good enough ....but why???
i'll tell you why because enriching their own is the only way they can get weapons grade uranium
you can atack me all you want pieman but you still have not answered ZMAX !!!
[edit on 30-4-2006 by the_sentinal]
Originally posted by tsensel
Originally posted by mad scientist
Thr domestic prices for Iranian oil ARE NOT skyrocketing, what you think it costs them the same rates as the west pays
What the hell do you think opec is?
All oil is priced in USD. Iran and venezuela have both threatened to price their oil in euros.
Iran does wnat a nuclear weapons not just nuclear power, otherwise why would they reject Russia's offer to enrich the Uranium - the self suffiecny argument they parrot doesn't hold weight.
I'm glad you think we're entitled to it. But other people arent because you're scared.
Wow this is very intresting. It's the first time i've heard about this. I'll have to look up the context and verify from other sources. As of recent all american and UK news in regards to iran has been taken out of context and slanted. So you can never be too sure.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
We have both Gas and Oil , plus refineries here in the USA yet we still have Nuclear Power plants as well as newer ones planned for future use. So whats your point? A fuel rod typically lasts for about 7 years and with newer processes over 10 years and thats from one fuel rod. Why should they waste a resource that they can sell on the open market for 70.00 a barrel? To appease and make Israel and the US feel comfortable? I don't think so and it is not fair to expect that from 2 nations that use nuclear power and nuclear weaponry.
Since you are so up to date on israel. Let me ask you...does some other country enrich their Uranium? I doubt it very much. So why should it be expected of them to enrich uranium offsite?
Originally posted by mad scientist
So what ? Iran doesn't pay OPEC prices for its own oil, DUH.
Gee, I wonder why people would be scared of a fundamentalist Iran gaining nuclear weapons Maybe it's because of their history of sponsoring terrorism and callous disregard of the lives of their people.
Yeah yeah whatever LOL, you are more enlightened. SHame about your spelling it's Shah of Iran and Ayotollah Khormeni.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Originally posted by the_sentinal
do you guy's really think that iran needs nuclear energy with all the oil & natural gas that they possess gas in iraq is a nickle a gallon so how bad could iran need nuclear energy.. ok so no one has really said they cant have it . russia offered to enrich their uranium for them but that wasnt good enough ....but why???
i'll tell you why because enriching their own is the only way they can get weapons grade uranium
you can atack me all you want pieman but you still have not answered ZMAX !!!
[edit on 30-4-2006 by the_sentinal]
We have both Gas and Oil , plus refineries here in the USA yet we still have Nuclear Power plants as well as newer ones planned for future use. So whats your point? A fuel rod typically lasts for about 7 years and with newer processes over 10 years and thats from one fuel rod. Why should they waste a resource that they can sell on the open market for 70.00 a barrel? To appease and make Israel and the US feel comfortable? I don't think so and it is not fair to expect that from 2 nations that use nuclear power and nuclear weaponry.
Since you are so up to date on israel. Let me ask you...does some other country enrich their Uranium? I doubt it very much. So why should it be expected of them to enrich uranium offsite?
Sorry the_sentinal but you were the one who tossed the bias word around. If you consider that I placed before you the proof to back myself up that it is you being biased, then so be it. I didn't make those posts, you did. I don't post messages everytime Israel drops a bomb on innocent people and start crying about the sky falling, but if you post a message that I have a different opinion about, I will voice it regardless of what you think. Why post such topics if you are going to tell people replying that they are Biased? That would be something I'd consider to be trolling if you are just looking to post a message and only expect messages that were in agreement with your ideas.
Originally posted by tsensel
Originally posted by mad scientist
So what ? Iran doesn't pay OPEC prices for its own oil, DUH.
And you think that they can honestly run all their energy needs off of oil from their country? They will have to import energy as they build their economy. Will they have to pay opec prices? Yes.
What is a good way to avoid this?
Supplement a large portion of your oil/gas power plants with nuclear facilities. This also frees up energy which can be sold on the market as stated before. At 70$ a barrel, it's almost more expensive than solar!