It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Well if it's not legal why should it be credible. The US kep their U2 overflights ecret and didn't announce them publicly.
Originally posted by StellarXBecause the original article did not say where it got the information from which is not even legal last i checked.
No i was simply pinting out if you could there's no point in telling everyone and annoumcing it because it's important.
You should talk?
I assume on the US side? Do we know that was not in fact true?
All media lies russian media is no exception there has been plenty of instances where that has happened. No news media is completely reliable.
Western media lies far more often than anyone gives it credit for and it is simply not held accountable for it. You have no idea just yet but that does not surprise me either.
I'm not sure of how many overflights but there have been several. I heard it somewhere but i kow it's happening. here it is.....
Us drones may on occasion enter Iranian air space but i doubt they go very far over the border; feel free to prove otherwise.
www.defensetech.org...
Usually, hunting for missiles and reactors from the sky would be a job for the Air Force. But those spy drones that are flying over Iran, looking for nukes -- they belong to the CIA, according to Aviation Week.
pred_desert.jpg"They are using the I-Gnat and Predator [drones that the CIA] used early in the Afghanistan war... They focus on small areas, and that's what they need to find those dispersed [nuclear weapons development] sites," a senior Air Force official says. "The data are sent back to Beale [Air Force Base in California, via satellite]... The information is then separated by its code word [prefix] and sent to the proper agency."
Beale is the major intelligence exploitation center; processed information is then distributed, often by secure landline, to other bases such as Indian Springs auxiliary airfield near Las Vegas, where Predator missions are controlled.
The CIA [was the] first [American agency to use] armed Predators, although flown remotely by [Air Force] pilots, that were launched on combat missions from bases in Uzbekistan. Since both the Army and Air Force now operate similar [drones], the CIA's small fleet could be flown from the same bases in the theater or from small bases in remote areas of Afghanistan or Iraq.
Which could explain the bomber overflight. If you can provide sources we can solve this thread most likely.
Overflights of the USSR stopped rather early on after they proved they could shoot them down. Flying along borders might get you good press but it is hardly the wreckless disregard for international law you suppose it is. The Us has granted Russia the right to overfly the US with recce aircraft( a few times a year as i recall) as long as they provide the flight plans and that was what i tried to point out here..
Yes that's true but that won't save them from all the nukes you know. It's cpability is limited and pretty soon we''l have our own defenses which will be composed of MEADS and THAAD.
But Russia is the only country with a functional anti-ballistic missile defense system. There's a bragging right for you.
Originally posted by The Crow
But Russia is the only country with a functional anti-ballistic missile defense system. There's a bragging right for you.
Originally posted by Russian Boy
Well gost, Nikita Krushove didnt exactly quit . He came to an agreement with US to withdraw the missles from cuba only if US withdraw their from Turkey .
Originally posted by Russian Boy
Well gost, Nikita Krushove didnt exactly quit .
He came to an agreement with US to withdraw the missles from cuba only if US withdraw their from Turkey.
Originally posted by urmomma158
Well if it's not legal why should it be credible.
The US kep their U2 overflights ecret and didn't announce them publicly.
No i was simply pinting out if you could there's no point in telling everyone and annoumcing it because it's important.
I don't understand make your point cleaer . Russian news sources lie as well.
All media lies russian media is no exception there has been plenty of instances where that has happened. No news media is completely reliable.
I'm not sure of how many overflights but there have been several. I heard it somewhere but i kow it's happening. here it is.....
doesn't say how many though. I will try to find more the article is VERY long so you might have trouble finding it.
Which could explain the bomber overflight. If you can provide sources we can solve this thread most likely.
lol!! You make me laugh how about IR missiles that use lock on after lauch on order form long waves and switch to IR seeker mode. Plasma waves act like a mirror with long waves. You can't just put up a plasma cloud and assume it will cover all bands and make you toally invisible.. Even cold plasma is very hot(cold is simply a relative term to hot plasma). Not to mention it leaves an ionized trail for us to track. cough Silent Sentry (great for spotting them) cough cough.Come on you can do better than that Maincloak.
Originally posted by Manincloak
I've got one thing to say: Plasma Stealth.
Gotta be sure it works before you use it in combat
Originally posted by StellarX
I believe you should investigate the people you source your information from as you seem to be thinking short term when attacking what i have said.
Originally posted by WestPoint23
Attacking? This is a discussion, you are not open to evidence or material which states the opposite of what you are claiming?
Besides, what matters here is the integrity of the information and its relevance, not the agenda of its source.
Well if this has anything to do with the open skies act than this is simply overinflated bragging. If i found a flaw in the enemy's systems i wouldn't tell him about it,i would try to play on that weakness which is why i don't find the article very confusing.
Originally posted by StellarXWell i can understand how so few things make sense with your grasp of the language. The original article did not say where it got the material from and what i did was find out where it did and then posted the original source. Do you follow yet?
I was talking of the flights before the shootdown. The UsSR didn't know of the overflights.
I assume you could not find any sources sighting direct overflights of the USSR later than the U-2 shoot down?
No, If russia found a weakness in our air defenses they should keep it secret. Either they were too stupid to keep it secret or talking BS.
Well it IS important and there is no way the US public would find out about their vulnerability from their own leaders.
Obviously
Yes there is lying on all sides.....
All media lies there's no point in pointing out lies if the opposing sides lie as well. There's no doubt Russian sources lie as well and so do other sources around the world.
The difference being that everyone KNOWS ( or have been so indoctrinated at least) Russian media lies while Western media is just 'suspect' instead of being looked at in the same way. Western media ( like most others) are completely unreliable if you do not know a great many things to start with.
Perhaps in your imagination......
Well the moment the CIA gets involved i believe very little ( i almost always catch them in a lie of some sort) so if you have any other sources stating that regular armed forces units are involved i would much rather look at that.
You seem to be too lazy then.
I do not have a problem with reading books if it's properly sourced.
If i need to i will.
I am not the one who has trouble understanding my intent. Just browse for "open skies act" if you wish to look at the information.
Originally posted by waynos
codexkeeper, thanks for that
If you started in 1988 would that mean you continued in this role into the 1990's?
If so would you say there was an obvious change in the frequency of these incursions after 1990? This is what was puzzling me from my first post, if they stopped after the Soviet Union collapsed wht start again now? Or did they just carry on as before?
Originally posted by urmomma158
Well if this has anything to do with the open skies act than this is simply overinflated bragging.
If i found a flaw in the enemy's systems i wouldn't tell him about it,i would try to play on that weakness which is why i don't find the article very confusing.
I was talking of the flights before the shootdown. The UsSR didn't know of the overflights.
No, If russia found a weakness in our air defenses they should keep it secret. Either they were too stupid to keep it secret or talking BS.
Perhaps in your imagination......
You seem to be too lazy then.
Originally posted by urmomma158
Stellar why are you attacking westpoint's claims.
All you do when someone corrects you is make baseless,irrelevantclaims among many others.
Not to mention you deny what you said. Wellattacking your sources is very possible too concerning past history.
Originally posted by StellarX
Or it did happen and they are trying to send a clear political message?