 |
reply posted on 23-4-2006 @ 08:03 PM by marg6043
|
I am very delighted with the new and improved page.
The page looks very professional and trustworthy, it will become a very preferred spot for news seekers in the INTERNET that loves a conspiracy angle
to what they read.
Great job.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 23-4-2006 @ 08:19 PM by AngelWings9999
|
Very Nice,
& professional, & much easier & convenient for us! Great Job!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-4-2006 @ 02:55 AM by TK868
|
Lookin very nice.
Just a tiny thing I noticed, the title hasn't been tagged, it's just "http://www.atsnn.com/" I assume it would be tagged ATSNN or something and
that the RSS link has gone..I don't know about others but I use the rss feed, might be good to bring it back for the newer members that find ATSNN
now.
But definently looking great, good work.
[edit on 24/4/06 by TK868]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-4-2006 @ 07:11 AM by Ulvetann
|
Looking very nice! I haven't gotten around to debug it, but its looks are good!
Ok, some fast bug-issues...
I believe there will be a 'fix'/'patch' on those red-coloured EXTERNAL IMAGE-to picture-links? -And the html-coding seems messed up.
Where I earlier made a /bold or /italic-formatting, it is messed up, with no linebreak. Don't really look too good in my posts.
[edit on 24-4-2006 by Ulvetann]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-4-2006 @ 11:09 AM by soficrow
|
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 24-4-2006 @ 12:15 PM by Thain Esh Kelch
|
Wow - Awesome design!  Very pro-looking, screams up-2-date news-site.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 03:51 PM by Umbrax
|
I'm excited to see the types of articles that get "published" on ATSNN now.
The main page is realy cool
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 06:02 PM by jsobecky
|
And how many YES votes are now needed for a successful submission?
 Far too many people vote no because they disagree with the story politically or something. They aren't voting on the relevance of the news,
rather whether they 'like' it or not. 
And now they have no voice to choose that a story is not relevant, or is a repeat, or whatever.
 It's not anyone's job to check for spelling, grammar and format errors but the author. 
Then this is a major break from the previous policy.
I don't mean to pick on you, BH, but you're the only one with mod status or greater that is addressing these questions. And we do appreciate you
sharing your interpretation on the new rules.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 06:08 PM by SkepticOverlord
|
Originally posted by jsobeckyAnd how many YES votes are now needed for a successful submission? 
5
 Uh... by not voting for it? That's my plan. 
Submissions have 48 hours to become ATSNN stories, after that, it automatically move to current events if it wasn't voted up.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 06:41 PM by Springer
|
Originally posted by jsobecky
I don't mean to pick on you, BH, but you're the only one with mod status or greater that is addressing these questions. And we do appreciate you
sharing your interpretation on the new rules.

Jsobecky, she isn't a Mod, she's a member... What's your point?
The new system resolves the HUGE "issues" we had with authors complaining about biased "no" votes. Now if there aren't enough yes votes in 48
hours it goes straight to "O.C.E." no harm, no foul, no drama...
Life is good.
Springer...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 06:48 PM by loam
|
Personally, I think you guys did a hell of a job revamping the system...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 07:05 PM by Springer
|
Thanks Loam...
As hard as my buddy S.O. worked on it that's NICE to hear!
Springer...
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 07:57 PM by jsobecky
|
Well, excuse me!
New MODERATORS for AboveTopSecret.com!
Please join me in congratulating Umbrax, Benevolent Heretic, wecomeinpeace, mrwupy, Hellmutt, AgentSmith, Majic, masqua, 12m8keall2c, Riwka and
WyrdeOne for becoming the newest members of the BEST STAFF on the web!
Each of these members have shown the attributes we look for when we make staff decisions, it is my pleasure to welcome them to the ATS Staff Family.
Springer... 
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 08:41 PM by DontTreadOnMe
|
Personally, I really like the new system. Those NO votes were always a throw of the dice, and they were NO fun to see in your inbox.
I think SO did and awesome with the updates, the new ATSNN page format, really exceptionally nice. And, certainly it leaves no run for any
compliant IMHO
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 08:59 PM by Majic
|
Postmodism
Originally posted by jsobecky
Well, excuse me! 
Hopefully this will help clear things up:
Why I'm not a Mod Anymore
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 25-4-2006 @ 09:25 PM by jsobecky
|
Thank you, Majic. I didn't realize that she had bowed out. She would have made an excellent mod, imo. But I understand her reasons for doing so, and
it's characteristic of her to nip the drama by posting her reasons.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 26-4-2006 @ 08:49 AM by loam
|
No problem, Springer...
And I had to just come back here to say AGAIN that the ATSNN front page is a work of art!
I am not just gratuitously throwing out a compliment. I truly believe it is the best formatted news page out there! I think most people know
how many of those I read, and imo, ATSNN is now hands down the best of what I see!
What a great way to start my day...
Well done, indeed!
[edit on 26-4-2006 by loam]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |