Originally posted by Masonic Light
I don't think that gods have color or any other physical attributes, but if you can provide a photo, I'd be willing to concede.
When you look in the mirror everyday you do see a potential God.
But most of us, including myself of course, are no more than rice eating worms.
It was Pike's belief that the ancient Aryans were the possessors of the original and pure religion, which were corrupted by the Egyptians, Hebrews, and even the Aryans' own descendants (Hindus, Zoroastrians, and modern Europeans and Americans).
Well who are these "Aryans", and where did they come from?
The Gnostic/Theosophical view is that the first sub-race of the Aryan Root-Race were the Mongolians and Tibetans of the Gobi desert, if I'm not mistaken.
"Aryan" is an Ancient term for Noble One.
In Buddhism it is in reference to a certain level of Initiation.
It does not necessarily refer to those of a pale skin color; even though the latter adopted the term for themselves.
Pike was of the opinion that the ancient Aryans constituted the first real civilization and religion, and that all others were derived from them in a degraded form. For example, he believed that the seven potencies of the Deity recognized by the ancient Aryans were misunderstood by Hebrew scholars at Babylon when they first became exposed to the doctrines of Pythagoras. Misunderstanding the esoteric meaning of the Tetractys, they instituted ten emanations instead of the original seven, which became the Sephiroth (see Pike's "Lectures On The Indo-Aryans" and Legenda B of the 32nd degree)
Well I'm of the opinion that this can be reconciled, at that the Babylonians and Hebrews and Kemetians all knew it.
The Seven Logoi(Five known Dhyani Buddhas plus two Occult Dhyani Buddhas) may be related to Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Moon, Earth.
Or perhaps Neptune, Uranus, Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Sun, Pluto.
But somehow, the Seven Logoi and 10 Sephiroth can be reconciled.
The best way to know, is to investigate internally, instead of juggling opinions all the time.
Though it would certainly help to study Gnostic-Kabbalah and Meditation in combination with ABHIDHARMAKOSABHASYAM and ABHIDHARMASAMUCCAYA(Buddhist Kabbalah).
Pythagoras, from what I understand, besides being an Initiate of Shetaut Neter, was also an Initiate of the Samkhya sect of India that is often mentioned in Buddhism in comparison to the Vaibhashika, Sautrantika, Chittamatra, Svatantrika-Madhyamaka and Prasangika-Madhyamaka(Five main schools of Buddhism, the Prasangika Middle-Way as put forth by Nagarjuna usually winning in debates).
It is said by some that the Pythagorean system was most heavily influenced by the Samkhya philosophy.
I don't recall Pike mentioning Higgins, but refers to Blavatsky as a charlatan on p. 135 of his "Symbolism of the Blue Degrees".
Hmmm... interesting, I'll have to look that up.
Have you studied the "Celtic Druids" and "Anacalypis"?
I agree that it was not necessarily a bad thing to have been an original member; however, there is not the slightest bit of evidence that Pike was a member. In the abovementioned book, Pike relates that outside of Masonry, the only Society which he belonged was the Oddfellows. Furthermore, even then, the KKK required Protestant Christianity as a prerequisite to membership, and Pike despised sectarian societies, as is evidenced by many passages in "Morals and Dogmas".
Fair enough, I'll have to learn more about this subject as well.
[edit on 22-11-2006 by Tamahu]




