It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Clinton's role in 9/11

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 23 2006 @ 01:59 AM
link   
Just an idea with nothing to back it up.

It is unlikely that 9/11 occurred with no 'preparation' before the 2000 election. With that in mind and looking at this from the standpoint of the REAL behind the scenes players who control the white house puppets, it seems logical that Bill Clinton's role in that preparation would be to bolster the economy. This theory works regardless of whether or not he "knew" the plan.

With a major surplus available and most average Americans having done well during the 90's, we could literally AFFORD to wage an expensive war.
The plan would be to just make sure there's enough money to get started with a strong footing in the mid-east. Then by the time we wake up to the reality that there's a problem, there's no choice but to continue .. unless we want Arabs knocking on our doors.

If the economy had not been built up for 8 years, the public would have been hesitant about war considering rough times at home.

The last thing the Bush administration had to worry about in selling the Iraq invasion idea to the public, was that people would be initially concerned with the cost.

Whaddayathink?




posted on Apr, 23 2006 @ 04:01 AM
link   
seems plausible. Even though it would potentially be political suicide for Bush. Since the economy of the present would always be compared to the surplus under Clinton's presidency.

But since when has he cared about public image anyway?



posted on Apr, 23 2006 @ 04:27 AM
link   
Seems like a long way to go plan to invade iraq....do you really think they would plan 12yrs in advance...they could've at least found a better reason to invade than the supposed WOMD that were there....they had enough time to think of a better excuse.



posted on Apr, 23 2006 @ 05:24 AM
link   
It's not good for the powers that be to have too much prosperity though. The 90's Economy wasn't amazing but it wasn't terrible either. Keep in mind the better a society is doing the less amount of people there are in the military.



[edit on 23-4-2006 by Crazy_Mr_Crowley]



posted on Apr, 23 2006 @ 07:02 AM
link   
Word has it this was planned many years ago. I think we could even trace it before Bush sr.

I beleive they were all involved.



new topics

top topics
 
0

log in

join