It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
The problem with most black communities is rather simple and apparently common no matter where they are from and that is they are dependant on someone else for their survival.
Just like in new orleans.
Just like in this case.
Bill crosby tried to tell them this but theyd rather label him a "racist" or an "uncle tom". perhaps this stems from slavery, I dont know, I find it hard to believe that this would cross generations like this.
Bill cosby old them to stop wasting money on sports stuff and "bling" and invest in education and books and they threw a fit. Education is very important for self growth. (one of the few things I agree with the liberals on).
a big concept that seems to have escaped them is self-reliance. Not dependancy on others or the government. This, IMO, is the basic difference between repulicans and democrats in the US.
democrats wish to continue, either unknowingly or purposely, to force a people who are already dependant on others, to become further dependant on the government thus continue the slave frame of mind in the black community.
Republicans would rather strive themselves, to provide for themselves. (this was in theory and has resulted in cut throat business which is another matter entirely).
Stop handing people things and make them grow. Make them self-reliant,just like that scripture "give a man a fish, you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime." and people say the christian bible is worthless......
Originally posted by Flinx
XphilesPhan,
Why did you start talking about the blacks in Africa then start comparing them to the blacks in New Orleans?
Then why did you go off on Bill Cosby and something about bling bling?
Originally posted by karby
now to try to clarify my position: please try to recall what it was that led the black population to react in the atrocious way they did.
the feelings were boiling under the surface for quite some time and it was just a matter before it eventually exploded.
now that a good portion of the country actually realizes that no matter what happened in the past, that white zimbabwean farmers did eventualy become benificial to the country,
will it be possible for the people of that country to backtrack their mistakes and move on? moreover, reguardless of what you may feel, will white farmers even want to come back after what happened to them?
for the most part i agree with most of you. yes believe it or not, racism played a part in shaping what Zimbabwe is today, and if it was me and/or my family that had went through that nightmare, i wouldn't want to return either.
that part i'm not disputing.
Originally posted by BlackOps719
So let me get this straight....African blacks chase away the evil wicked undeserving white farmers at knife point,
take their land by force, demand half of the financial rights to their businesses, all in the name of blatant racism operating under a racist Mugabe regime -
and now that these white farmers have been chased away and the black Africans are left running the show suddenly they realize that they aren't smart enough or industrious enough to grow their own crops to provide food to feed themselves and are now starving.
Now they want the white farmers to come back "hey, I know we took your land and terrorized your families, but can you show me how to plant this corn?" lmao ...
They deserve to starve. In this world what goes around comes around, why should these farmers have any pity for these butchers at all?
Why would they risk life and limb to go back into that warzone to help feed the scum who just brutalized and robbed them?
That is like asking a woman who was raped to come over and fix dinner for her attacker, absolutely absurd.
The moral of the story, don't bite the hand that feeds you, regardless of what color it is. But hey, I hear those grasshoppers don't taste half bad if you roast em right
Originally posted by DeusEx
But, see, it's not 'a few people's mistakes'.
This is governemnt supported lynch mobs ravaging folk's farms.
I don't know abotu you, but I don';t know a farmer who has the time or patience to properly oppress a person in this day and age, much less in the disease ravaged, starving continent such as Africa.
This is public demand, and the rewards of public demand. Shows you what not educating the people does, but then again, how many of these people ASPIRE to education instead of nice rims and a new AK?
DE
Originally posted by Amuk
Lets tone down the personal remarks ok
Originally posted by StellarX
Originally posted by karby
now to try to clarify my position: please try to recall what it was that led the black population to react in the atrocious way they did.
Just to clarify what was so 'atrocious about it compared to what is currently happening in Iraq and many other places where western forces are at work?
---------------
everything. i think what happening in Iraq sickening. i think what's happened in Zimbabwe is sickening too. in any country, every place you look, it's everywhere. some people call it 'human nature', but i don't think it's natural to cause so much hurt and pain and misery, and not feel a thing. it's the 'human's suck' syndrome, it's been around forever, and from the looks of it it's not going away any time soon...sometimes people can overcome it, however most of the time they don't. i thought the invitation back was a step in a positive direction, but like many people here at ATS alone have shown, revenge is the law of the day, and no one is ready or willing to forvige(the blacks weren't, and the white's aren't appearantly) no matter how much potential good the outcome shows. my mistake. i've been known to dream too much. i shouldn't think so positively.
the feelings were boiling under the surface for quite some time and it was just a matter before it eventually exploded.
Which goes to show that Mugabe was not a good reformer at all considering it took decades and the actions of almost rebel factions for this to happen.
-----------------
no argument there
now that a good portion of the country actually realizes that no matter what happened in the past, that white zimbabwean farmers did eventualy become benificial to the country,
They were always beneficial to the country as such even if the state chose not to invest the tax returns in the general upliftment of the country for a very long time. Mugabe can at the very least be blamed for not using the labours of white farmers to the betterment of the country and the people while he chose not to give the land back to his supporters.
--------
not truly. the black population weren't starving before the arrival of whites...and i mean waaaay before. pre colonial black population obviously knew something about how to feed themselves, esle they'd have all truly died out from starvation. so where did that knowledge go? and yes, Mugabe is a very short sighted man, i think we all know.
will it be possible for the people of that country to backtrack their mistakes and move on? moreover, reguardless of what you may feel, will white farmers even want to come back after what happened to them?
Only a few people were involved including whites who thought they could just go on in the same old way forever and 'war rebels' who did not care about the country in general. The public at large were more involved by their inaction than by their action which is nothing new.
They will come back given the chance and some measure of security and -----
agreed
for the most part i agree with most of you. yes believe it or not, racism played a part in shaping what Zimbabwe is today, and if it was me and/or my family that had went through that nightmare, i wouldn't want to return either.
that part i'm not disputing.
What nightmare? We have far far far worse things happening on South-African farms but since it gets no press in the west i guess it matters not! Farmers in South Africa have always been in far more danger than those in Zimbabwe and that did not stop them farming or wanting to firm. Farmers are by their very nature people who take risks and having guns and death involved rarely removes their urge to live the way they do.
-------
if your family (or members of your family) were severly maimed or murdered, and a mob of people chased you out of the only country you've ever truly known, would you not consider that a nightmare? i don't mean it to belittle any other suffering occuring across the globe, honestly. but while it's true that no one human problem should have precidence over another simply because of what the press choses to cover, i can only help but think 'baby steps'. try taking it all in at once and your head is guaranteed to explode...or at least a melt down.
Stellar
Originally posted by WIGAN MIKE
I actually met 2 south Africans when this was going on, 1 was white and fled to England,
one was black and went to England a few years earlier, I talked to both of them about it..
It was bad enough taking the land of the white farmers, as it was, but thats not my main point, my main point is the way they went about it.
1. Slaughtering whole white families.
2. raping the white women and the little girls.
3. Having to sleep with a shot gun under the bed.
Also I know a couple of Nigerians, and a bloke from Guinee, and they told me that South Africans, don't like anyone who's not from there neck of the woods..MIKE
Originally posted by WyrdeOne
Stellar, what racial slurs?
And what the heck is 'passive ignorance' and what are the rules governing our treatment of it?
Originally posted by MadGreebo
I worked in Immigration detention for a few years - and one thing I can tell you is that the Black africans HATE each other with such a passion it is awe inspiring to behold. They love to hurt each other, its the only way i have to say it - They took great delight in really really trying to knock seven shades out of each other - and all because of a tribal / racial slant ... and the scary thing? When asked why they did it, they just shrugged and said because its always been that way - Congo / Nigeria was the best fights. wow is all i can say.
But heres the rub - stick white people in amongst it, and they join up, fight the whites, and when thats finished go back to fighting each other.
No wonder the continents in such a mess.
Whites should leave Africa to it - come back to europe - we need farmers, and im sure they'll even subsidise you all
Originally posted by StellarX
What this have to do with oppression anyways? The farm workers mostly protected their white employers and far more farm workers died protecting themselves and their families than did white farmers. This was not a black vs white issue AT ALL but the western press were apparently ordered to make it such a issue.
This is public demand, and the rewards of public demand. Shows you what not educating the people does, but then again, how many of these people ASPIRE to education instead of nice rims and a new AK?
Your buying into stereotypes created to alter your perception in the way it clearly did. Do you really believe that what you just said and if so please type up a few pages as to why you think anyone who lacks a education wants 'nice rims and a new AK' when both those things are norms that comes from the WEST ( gangsters/mafia meaning not African at all)?
Stellar