It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former German Minister Says Building 7 Used To Run 9/11 Attack

page: 3
3
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 2 2006 @ 10:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by bsbray11

Of course not:

Everyone knows that physics doesn't apply to falling skyscrapers.


..........You must be right, a physics professor who specializes in nuclear fusion must know all the physics behind slyscrapers...Hey, perhaps we should let physics professors build skyscrapers from now on....


Originally posted by bsbray11
Btw, I'll throw out again that his doctorate is not in nuclear physics specifically, since you ignored that and refused to offer any sources to back up your assertions.

[edit on 2-5-2006 by bsbray11]


His speciality is not nuclear physics?.....


Steven Earl Jones is a professor of physics at Brigham Young University who conducts research in nuclear fusion and solar energy.


www.answers.com...

Oh wait....nuclear fusion....wonder what that means....


[edit on 2-5-2006 by Muaddib]




posted on May, 3 2006 @ 03:52 PM
link   

Originally posted by Muaddib
..........You must be right, a physics professor who specializes in nuclear fusion must know all the physics behind slyscrapers...


Yeah, because it's the exact same as the physics behind everything else there Einstein. And remember this is the building falling in particular, and structural engineers aren't experts on falling buildings, in any sense. NIST doesn't even try to analyze global collapse despite their thousands of pages.

The SE's are only good for saying, "well, maybe this is what initially failed for such-and-such a reason," while already starting with the assumption that the collapses were natural. They have no expertise whatsoever in how or why the buildings continued to fall as they did.



Originally posted by bsbray11
Btw, I'll throw out again that his doctorate is not in nuclear physics specifically, since you ignored that and refused to offer any sources to back up your assertions.

[edit on 2-5-2006 by bsbray11]


His speciality is not nuclear physics?.....


I said doctorate. Not "speciality." It's in the text right there. I'll let you look up what a Ph. D. is and get back to me. Actually, look up "physics" on Wikipedia or something too while you're at it, because that's what his doctorate is in.

I'm not responding to this anymore; it's pointless.



posted on May, 3 2006 @ 04:10 PM
link   
Yeah WTC 7 could have been the key to the conspiracy. I think WTC 7 could have been used to generate a homing beacon to easely locate WTC twin tower, cause we all know these planes had cut every communication from the ground, so for the so called Alquaeda pilot wich we probly all agree for beeing ace pilot during 9/11 could have use this.
Then i will always be very very suspicious about WTC 7 cause it was the 1st steel reinforce building in history to collapse from fire only, that beeing said, i'm guessing every one would like to see how the structure fell wich is doable when analizing the steel structure who fell, BUT the steel structure is nowhere to be found US govt. and Guliani send the steel asap to China for melting, hmmm is anyone here smell somthing fishy. Hide the evidence of a conspiracy is their main concern speaking of Bush administration thats all i can say, and look closely at pentagon crime scene , you will see a line of probly 50 ppl searching for somthing in the grass of the pentagon, maybe they were searching for carbon fiber from the global hawk who ram into the Pentagon.



posted on May, 3 2006 @ 08:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by bsbray11
....................
I'm not responding to this anymore; it's pointless.


Of course you shouldn't after all the made up and debunked falsehoods you and some people have been trying to spread in the forums... buh, bye...



new topics

top topics
 
3
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join