73p/schwassmann-wachmann 3, page 5
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 2-5-2006 @ 04:15 PM by Escrotumus
Im not going to get any more magnified images of this comet because my mount is being serviced by the manufacturer I wanted to get a shot of the b fragment but my mount will be out for at least 2 weeks and the comet rises later and later as it approaches earth and work comes very early for me From the latest emphemeris it looks to me that this comet will only reach mag 6.5 which would only be visible naked eye from a very remote and dark place. Ive only been to 2 places where it was that dark: sequoia natl forest in cali, and an astronomy resort in northern new mexico. For the rest of us city and suburb dwellers youll have to be content with binocs or a small refractor.

If you want to see it this friday or saturday from your location then around midnight look to your east and find the very brightest star which will be vega. Aim your binocs at vega and you should just be able to see a blurry light in the same FOV as vega at a bit to the right. If not then scan your binocs a bit up and to the southeast (right of vega) and you should see it there on friday night. It will be a bit below and to the southeast (right of vega) on saturday night. The comet is magnitude 7 this weekend which is well within reach of a pair of 10x binos in suburbia. The moon should be getting low to the west so hopefully there wont be too much moonlight masking the comet.

I may try to do a nice wide angle shot of the b and c fragments with a 50mm lens this weekend if its clear on my alt/az mount but without my equatorial tracking mount the stars will be trailed somewhat. I am going to try to get both fragments into the field of view but that might be a stretch even with my 18mm wide angle lens....we will see.



reply posted on 3-5-2006 @ 09:10 PM by pacman
Then what is NASA saying?

]
NASA

" we propose to observe a magnitude 1 comet"


And who is the Culpepper Minute Men?



Someone pointed out this link above with this image over at GLP.

Didn't Nasa first claim 5 million miles, then now saying within our atmosphere (under 10,000 miles).


reply posted on 5-5-2006 @ 01:06 PM by dbates
Neon Haze is correct and here's the science to back it up

73P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 3-BD. Note how this fragment seems to be separated from the rest of the group by quite a bit.



Another recent thread here mentions someone's blog that claims that the comet will come close enough to be captured. Of course that's speculation, but if anyone wants to veer to the Predictions and Prophecy forum.. Click here

It feels like NASA's guessing when you read that the Nominal and Minimum distance vary from between 33.7 and 0.4 Lunar Distance(LD) Image if this piece is half-way between the Earth and Moon

[edit on 5-5-2006 by dbates]
Pages: <<  2    3    4    5    6  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 5 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 26 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 15 days ago with 22 member flags
Stunning close view of Mercury
  Posted 3 days ago with 20 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags